IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i3bp399-411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good Regulation in the Telecommunications and Postal Services Markets as a Necessary Tool in the Aspect of Sustainable Development and Society 5.0

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Budziewicz-Guzlecka
  • Anna Drab-Kurowska

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this research is to present the concept of regulation, defining the idea of sustainable development in terms of Society 5.0, developing recommendations for good regulation in the postal and telecommunications markets with social solutions. Design/Methodology/Approach: Critical analysis of scientific literature, graphic visualization, and the CAWI method have been used to support the research questions. Findings: The findings helped to formulate recommendations for the postal and telecommunications services and social solutions. Practical Implications: The obtained results can be used to formulate a model of good regulation regarding postal and telecommunications services and social solutions. Originality/value: The issues in such a context as the one presented in this article have not been studied in Polish and foreign literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Budziewicz-Guzlecka & Anna Drab-Kurowska, 2021. "Good Regulation in the Telecommunications and Postal Services Markets as a Necessary Tool in the Aspect of Sustainable Development and Society 5.0," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 399-411.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3b:p:399-411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2473/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George J. Stigler, 1971. "The Theory of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 2(1), pages 3-21, Spring.
    2. Armstrong, Mark & Porter, Robert, 2007. "Preface to the Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume 3," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 0, pages 00, Elsevier.
    3. Agnieszka Budziewicz-Guźlecka & Anna Drab-Kurowska, 2020. "Problems of Infrastructure Markets with Particular Emphasis on the Postal Market in the Context of Digital Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Matthew E. Gladden, 2019. "Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-39, May.
    5. Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), 2007. "Handbook of Industrial Organization," Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 3, number 1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wieslaw M. Maziarz, 2023. "Advanced Digital Skills in the Information Society-Poland Compared to the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 563-572.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajay Bhaskarabhatla & Priyatam Anurag & Chirantan Chatterjee & Enrico Pennings, 2021. "How Does Regulation Impact Strategic Repositioning by Firms Across Submarkets? Evidence from the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 209-227, September.
    2. Weeds, Helen, 2012. "Advertising and the Distribution of Content," CEPR Discussion Papers 9079, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Syngjoo Choi & Lars Nesheim & Imran Rasul, 2016. "Reserve Price Effects In Auctions: Estimates From Multiple Regression-Discontinuity Designs," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(1), pages 294-314, January.
    4. Robert E. Hall, 2012. "The Cyclical Response of Advertising Refutes Counter-Cyclical Profit Margins in Favor of Product-Market Frictions," NBER Working Papers 18370, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Annette Kirstein & Roland Kirstein, 2009. "Collective Wage Agreements on Fixed Wages and Piece Rates May Cartelize Product Markets," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 165(2), pages 250-259, June.
    6. Daiya Isogawa & Hiroshi Ohashi, 2019. "Price Effects of Target Ratcheting: A Progress Report on Medical Devices," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 331-340, September.
    7. Hovhannisyan, Vardges & Stiegert, Kyle & Bozic, Marin, 2014. "On the Endogeneity of Retail Markups in an Equilibrium Analysis: A Control-Function Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 39(2), pages 1-13.
    8. Paul Madden & Mario Pezzino, 2013. "Sports League Quality, Broadcaster TV Rights Bids and Wholesale Regulation of Sports Channels," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1304, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    9. Pavel Ilinov & Andrei Matveenko & Maxim Senkov & Egor Starkov, 2022. "Optimally Biased Expertise," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp736, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    10. Lars Isenhardt & Stefan Seifert & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Tenant Favoritism and Right of First Refusals in Farmland Auctions: Competition and Price Effects," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(2), pages 302-324.
    11. Yongmin Chen & Jianpei Li & Marius Schwartz, 2021. "Competitive differential pricing," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 52(1), pages 100-124, March.
    12. Emmanuelle Auriol & Antonio Estache & Liam Wren-Lewis, 2018. "Can Supranational Infrastructure Regulation Compensate for National Institutional Weaknesses?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 69(6), pages 913-936.
    13. Endre Bjoerndal & Mette Bjoerndal & Astrid Cullmann & Maria Nieswand, 2016. "Finding the Right Yardstick: Regulation under Heterogeneous Environments," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1555, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    14. Bortolotti, Bernardo & Cambini, Carlo & Rondi, Laura, 2013. "Reluctant regulation," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 804-828.
    15. Antoine Bouet & David Laborde & David Martimort, 2014. "Two-Tier Asymmetric Information as a Motive for Trade, Trade Policies and Inefficient Trade Agreements," Working Papers hal-02149476, HAL.
    16. Fiocco Raffaele, 2013. "The Optimal Institutional Design of Vertically Related Markets with Unknown Upstream Costs," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 183-210, June.
    17. Nozomu Muto & Yasuhiro Shirata & Takuro Yamashita, 2020. "Revenue-Capped Efficient Auctions," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1284-1320.
    18. J. Levin & L. Einav, 2012. "Empirical Industrial Organization: A Progress Report," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 1.
    19. Willems, Bert & Zwart, Gijsbert, 2016. "Regulatory Holidays and Optimal Network Expansion," Discussion Paper 2016-015, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    20. John Bennett & Ioana Chioveanu, 2019. "Pro‐Consumer Price Ceilings under Regulatory Uncertainty," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(4), pages 1757-1784, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Good regulation; sustainable development; Society 5.0; postal market; telecommunications market.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F68 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Policy
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • L87 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Postal and Delivery Services
    • L - Industrial Organization

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3b:p:399-411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.