IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i3bp249-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Innovative Model for Measuring Attitudes towards Digital Technology Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Bartczak
  • Stanislaw Lobejko

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article is to present an innovative model for measuring attitudes towards digital technology platforms. Design/Methodology/Approach: Such a model, based on a sample of 120 Polish companies, was developed as a result of research conducted in 2019. When building the model, a regression analysis of qualitative variables was applied, which involves predicting the values of specific variables. A top-down method was applied in this respect. In addition, an alternative version of the developed model was proposed. Findings: The construction of the model made it possible to prove that the factor which most strongly influences the attitudes of the management staff of Polish enterprises towards digital technology platforms is an economic factor (i.e., financial benefits associated with the use of such platforms). Furthermore, space for further research was created, including with regard to company structure, the industry in which it operates and the number of employees working there as correlates of attitudes towards digital technology platforms. Originality/value: The article discusses an innovative model for measuring attitudes towards digital technology platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Bartczak & Stanislaw Lobejko, 2021. "An Innovative Model for Measuring Attitudes towards Digital Technology Platforms," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 249-270.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3b:p:249-270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2461/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gawer, Annabelle, 2014. "Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1239-1249.
    2. J. Kruskal, 1964. "Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 29(1), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Louis Guttman, 1968. "A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 33(4), pages 469-506, December.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7127 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Martin Jetter & Gerhard Satzger & Andreas Neus, 2009. "Technological Innovation and Its Impact on Business Model, Organization and Corporate Culture – IBM’s Transformation into a Globally Integrated, Service-Oriented Enterprise," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(1), pages 37-45, February.
    6. Brousseau Eric & Penard Thierry, 2007. "The Economics of Digital Business Models: A Framework for Analyzing the Economics of Platforms," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-34, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stanisław Łobejko & Krzysztof Bartczak, 2021. "The Role of Digital Technology Platforms in the Context of Changes in Consumption and Production Patterns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Venera Tomaselli, 1996. "Multivariate statistical techniques and sociological research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 253-276, August.
    3. Roderick McDonald, 1976. "A note on monotone polygons fitted to bivariate data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(4), pages 543-546, December.
    4. Willem Heiser, 1991. "A generalized majorization method for least souares multidimensional scaling of pseudodistances that may be negative," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 7-27, March.
    5. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Geoffrey Parker & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2017. "Unraveling Platform Strategies: A Review from an Organizational Ambidexterity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber, 2021. "Modeling human thinking about similarities by neuromatrices in the perspective of fuzzy logic," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/21/09, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    7. Jan Leeuw, 1988. "Convergence of the majorization method for multidimensional scaling," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 5(2), pages 163-180, September.
    8. C Mar-Molinero & J Mingers, 2007. "An evaluation of the limitations of, and alternatives to, the Co-Plot methodology," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(7), pages 874-886, July.
    9. Yoshio Takane & J. Carroll, 1981. "Nonmetric maximum likelihood multidimensional scaling from directional rankings of similarities," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 389-405, December.
    10. J. Carroll, 1985. "Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 133-140, March.
    11. Nijkamp, P., 1980. "Soft econometric models : an analysis of regional income determinants," Serie Research Memoranda 0005, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    12. Phipps Arabie, 1978. "Random versus rational strategies for initial configurations in nonmetric multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(1), pages 111-113, March.
    13. Herden, Gerhard & Pallack, Andreas, 2005. "Adequateness and interpretability of objective functions in ordinal data analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 19-69, May.
    14. Ulf Lundberg & Gösta Ekman, 1973. "Subjective geographic distance: A multidimensional comparison," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 113-122, March.
    15. Abe, Makoto, 1998. "Error structure and identification condition in maximum likelihood nonmetric multidimensional scaling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 216-227, December.
    16. Benedict J. Drasch & Gilbert Fridgen & Tobias Manner-Romberg & Fenja M. Nolting & Sven Radszuwill, 2020. "The token’s secret: the two-faced financial incentive of the token economy," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 557-567, September.
    17. Jacqueline Meulman & Peter Verboon, 1993. "Points of view analysis revisited: Fitting multidimensional structures to optimal distance components with cluster restrictions on the variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 7-35, March.
    18. Gruenhage, Gina & Opper, Manfred & Barthelme, Simon, 2016. "Visualizing the effects of a changing distance on data using continuous embeddings," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 51-65.
    19. Akinori Okada & Tadashi Imaizumi, 1997. "Asymmetric multidimensional scaling of two-mode three-way proximities," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 14(2), pages 195-224, September.
    20. Krzysztof Bartczak, 2021. "The Impact of Digital Technology Platforms on Business Models in the Context of Consumer-Driven Processes," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 743-761.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Model; innovation; attitudes; measurement; digital technology platforms.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3b:p:249-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.