IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v104y2016icp51-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visualizing the effects of a changing distance on data using continuous embeddings

Author

Listed:
  • Gruenhage, Gina
  • Opper, Manfred
  • Barthelme, Simon

Abstract

Most Machine Learning (ML) methods, from clustering to classification, rely on a distance function to describe relationships between datapoints. For complex datasets it is hard to avoid making some arbitrary choices when defining a distance function. To compare images, one must choose a spatial scale, for signals, a temporal scale. The right scale is hard to pin down and it is preferable when results do not depend too tightly on the exact value one picked. Topological data analysis seeks to address this issue by focusing on the notion of neighborhood instead of distance. It is shown that in some cases a simpler solution is available. It can be checked how strongly distance relationships depend on a hyperparameter using dimensionality reduction. A variant of dynamical multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) is formulated, which embeds datapoints as curves. The resulting algorithm is based on the Concave–Convex Procedure (CCCP) and provides a simple and efficient way of visualizing changes and invariances in distance patterns as a hyperparameter is varied. A variant to analyze the dependence on multiple hyperparameters is also presented. A cMDS algorithm that is straightforward to implement, use and extend is provided. To illustrate the possibilities of cMDS, cMDS is applied to several real-world datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Gruenhage, Gina & Opper, Manfred & Barthelme, Simon, 2016. "Visualizing the effects of a changing distance on data using continuous embeddings," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 51-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:104:y:2016:i:c:p:51-65
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.06.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947316301438
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2016.06.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunter D.R. & Lange K., 2004. "A Tutorial on MM Algorithms," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 58, pages 30-37, February.
    2. Chen, Lisha & Buja, Andreas, 2009. "Local Multidimensional Scaling for Nonlinear Dimension Reduction, Graph Drawing, and Proximity Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(485), pages 209-219.
    3. J. Kruskal, 1964. "Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 29(1), pages 1-27, March.
    4. Roger Shepard, 1962. "The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 27(2), pages 125-140, June.
    5. Louis Guttman, 1968. "A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 33(4), pages 469-506, December.
    6. Warren Torgerson, 1952. "Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 17(4), pages 401-419, December.
    7. Roger Shepard, 1962. "The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 27(3), pages 219-246, September.
    8. J. Ramsay, 1978. "Confidence regions for multidimensional scaling analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(2), pages 145-160, June.
    9. de Leeuw, Jan & Mair, Patrick, 2009. "Multidimensional Scaling Using Majorization: SMACOF in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 31(i03).
    10. Jan Leeuw, 1988. "Convergence of the majorization method for multidimensional scaling," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 5(2), pages 163-180, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Venera Tomaselli, 1996. "Multivariate statistical techniques and sociological research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 253-276, August.
    2. Abe, Makoto, 1998. "Error structure and identification condition in maximum likelihood nonmetric multidimensional scaling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 216-227, December.
    3. Groenen, P.J.F. & Borg, I., 2013. "The Past, Present, and Future of Multidimensional Scaling," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2013-07, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Wedel, M., 1996. "A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Multidimensional Scaling Methods," Other publications TiSEM f72cc9d8-f370-43aa-a224-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Morales José F. & Song Tingting & Auerbach Arleen D. & Wittkowski Knut M., 2008. "Phenotyping Genetic Diseases Using an Extension of µ-Scores for Multivariate Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber, 2021. "Modeling human thinking about similarities by neuromatrices in the perspective of fuzzy logic," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/21/09, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    7. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Wedel, M., 1996. "A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Multidimensional Scaling Methods," Research Memorandum 725, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Xiaomeng Cao & Yuan Gao & Jingwei Cui & Shuangbiao Han & Lei Kang & Sha Song & Chengshan Wang, 2020. "Pore Characteristics of Lacustrine Shale Oil Reservoir in the Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation of the Songliao Basin, NE China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    9. He, Jiayi & Shang, Pengjian & Xiong, Hui, 2018. "Multidimensional scaling analysis of financial time series based on modified cross-sample entropy methods," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 500(C), pages 210-221.
    10. Gert Storms, 1995. "On the robustness of maximum likelihood scaling for violations of the error model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 247-258, June.
    11. J. Carroll, 1985. "Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 133-140, March.
    12. José A. Tenreiro Machado & Alexandra Galhano & Daniel Cao Labora, 2021. "A Clustering Perspective of the Collatz Conjecture," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Lin, L. & Fong, D.K.H., 2019. "Bayesian multidimensional scaling procedure with variable selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1-13.
    14. W. J. Krzanowski, 2006. "Sensitivity in Metric Scaling and Analysis of Distance," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 239-244, March.
    15. Ulf Lundberg & Gösta Ekman, 1973. "Subjective geographic distance: A multidimensional comparison," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 113-122, March.
    16. Henry Brady, 1985. "Statistical consistency and hypothesis testing for nonmetric multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 509-537, December.
    17. Jose Tenreiro Machado & Alexandra M. Galhano & Carla S. Cordeiro, 2021. "Discretization of Fractional Operators: Analysis by Means of Advanced Computational Techniques," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Jacqueline Meulman & Peter Verboon, 1993. "Points of view analysis revisited: Fitting multidimensional structures to optimal distance components with cluster restrictions on the variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 7-35, March.
    19. Roger Shepard, 1974. "Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(4), pages 373-421, December.
    20. Phipps Arabie & J. Carroll, 1980. "Mapclus: A mathematical programming approach to fitting the adclus model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(2), pages 211-235, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:104:y:2016:i:c:p:51-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.