IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i1p1240-1249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Innovation in Diary Farms in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Karolina Babuchowska
  • Renata Marks-Bielska

Abstract

Purpose: The article aimed to present the conditions for introducing innovations in Polish farms. Due to the diversity in agricultural production, this research's focus was narrowed down to the group of farms specializing in milk production. Design/Methodology/Approach: The analysis – alongside the literature review - was conducted using primary data collected through surveys carried out amongst 1047 milk producers operating in Poland. The selection of the sample was planned so that the study's outcomes could be generalized and applied to the entire population of milk producers. Findings: The research results have shown that various factors influence the modernization of farms specializing in milk production. As the most important, respondents indicated streamlining the work (making it more comfortable) on the farm, this was rated at 0.519. The next factor was an improvement in the quality of milk produced (0.499), increase of production efficiency (0.490), and compliance with animal welfare requirements (0,469). Practical Implications: Technological changes related to the introduction of innovations in farms are mainly of an exogenous origin. In principle, it is not observed that farmers carry out their research self-activities; in the vast majority of cases, the innovations are made in a non-agricultural environment. Originality/Value: The effect of innovations, which are introduced on farms, are firstly material effects - boiling down to the modernization of the farmer's work environment, and secondly - changes in the volume and structure of production that can lead to the generation of higher income from agricultural activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Karolina Babuchowska & Renata Marks-Bielska, 2021. "Determinants of Innovation in Diary Farms in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 1240-1249.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:1:p:1240-1249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2021/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Diederen & Hans van Meijl & Arjan Wolters, 2003. "Modernisation in agriculture: what makes a farmer adopt an innovation?," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3/4), pages 328-342.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adisu Fanta Bate & Esther Wanjiru Wachira & Sándor Danka, 2023. "The determinants of innovation performance: an income-based cross-country comparative analysis using the Global Innovation Index (GII)," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Marks-Bielska, Renata & Bilyj, Justyna, 2023. "Conditions for Introducing Innovation on Farms," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2023(4).
    3. Kamil Decyk, 2024. "Innovative Activity of the Service Sector of the EU Member States," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6969-6994, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adejuwon, Olawale O. & Ilori, Matthew O. & Taiwo, Kehinde A., 2016. "Technology adoption and the challenges of inclusive participation in economic activities: Evidence from small scale oil palm fruit processors in southwestern Nigeria," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 111-120.
    2. Everlyne, Andiema Chesang & Agnes, Nkurumwa Oywaya & David, Amudavi Mulama, 2013. "Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Adoption of Energy– Saving Technologies among Smallholder Farmers: The Case of West Pokot County, Kenya," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 3(4), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Micheels, Eric T. & Nolan, James F., 2016. "Examining the effects of absorptive capacity and social capital on the adoption of agricultural innovations: A Canadian Prairie case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 127-138.
    4. Paul Diederen & Hans Van Meijl & Arjan Wolters & Katarzyna Bijak, 2003. "Innovation adoption in agriculture : innovators, early adopters and laggards," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 67, pages 29-50.
    5. Blandford, David & Boisvert, Richard N., 2004. "U.S. Policy for Agricultural Adjustment," IAPRAP\IATRC Summer Symposium, Adjusting to Domestic and International Agricultural Reform in Industrial Countries, June 6-7, 2004, Philadelphia, PA, 15771, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).
    6. Poppe, Krijn J. & van Meijl, Hans, 2004. "Adjustment and Differences in Farm Performance - a Farm Management Perspective from the Netherlands," IAPRAP\IATRC Summer Symposium, Adjusting to Domestic and International Agricultural Reform in Industrial Countries, June 6-7, 2004, Philadelphia, PA, 15765, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).
    7. John E. Meador & David J. O’Brien & Michael L. Cook & Greg Grothe & LuAnn Werner & Daniel Diang’a & Rebecca M. Savoie, 2016. "Building Sustainable Smallholder Cooperatives in Emerging Market Economies: Findings from a Five-Year Project in Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Bengü Everest, 2021. "Farmers’ adaptation to climate-smart agriculture (CSA) in NW Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4215-4235, March.
    9. Dar, Manzoor H. & Waza, Showkat A. & Nayak, Swati & Chakravorty, Ritadhi & Zaidi, Najam W. & Hossain, Mosharaf, 2020. "Gender focused training and knowledge enhances the adoption of climate resilient seeds," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Vestal, Mallory K. & Ward, Clement E. & Doye, Damona G. & Lalman, David L., 2006. "Beef Cattle Production and Management Practices and Implications for Educators," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21426, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. van der Meulen, Harold & van Asseldonk, Marcel & Ge, Lan, 2016. "The state of innovation in European agriculture: Innovators are few and far between," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(3), pages 1-3, December.
    12. Natalia Molina & Gianluca Brunori & Elena Favilli & Stefano Grando & Patrizia Proietti, 2021. "Farmers’ Participation in Operational Groups to Foster Innovation in the Agricultural Sector: An Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    13. Anatoli Marantidou & Anastasios Michailidis & Afroditi Papadaki-Klavdianou, 2011. "Information and Communication technologies as agricultural extension tools," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 10(1), pages 114-125.
    14. Kathrin Hasler & Hans-Werner Olfs & Onno Omta & Stefanie Bröring, 2017. "Drivers for the Adoption of Different Eco-Innovation Types in the Fertilizer Sector: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Chatalova, Lioudmila & Djanibekov, Nodir & Gagalyuk, Taras & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2017. "The paradox of water management projects in Central Asia: An institutionalist perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14.
    16. Huang, Jikun & Hu, Ruifa & van Meijl, Hans & van Tongeren, Frank, 2004. "Biotechnology boosts to crop productivity in China: trade and welfare implications," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 27-54, October.
    17. Johnson, Rachel J. & Doye, Damona G. & Lalman, David L. & Peel, Derrell S. & Raper, Kellie Curry, 2008. "Adoption Of Best Management Practices In Stocker Cattle Production," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6827, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    18. Nossal, Katarina, 2012. "Innovative capacity and productivity: an empirical analysis of Australian grain growers," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124353, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    19. Daowei Sun & Paul Hyland & Ockie Bosch, 2015. "A Systemic View of Innovation Adoption in the Australian Beef Industry," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 646-657, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation; farms; milk production; Poland.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q00 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - General
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:1:p:1240-1249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.