IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/paaero/340089.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conditions for Introducing Innovation on Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Marks-Bielska, Renata
  • Bilyj, Justyna

Abstract

Innovations are an integral element of the development of economic units, including farms. The main aim of the research was to identify and characterize the implemented innovations and methods of managing them on farms. The research was carried out on the basis of an original survey questionnaire addressed to 80 owners of farms from the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship. The research was carried out between June and November 2020. Research results have shown that innovations in agriculture are implemented mainly for economic reasons. Important reasons for these activities are the desire to achieve higher income, farm development, increase in efficiency and decrease in labor intensity. The most frequently indicated external barriers when trying to implement innovations were difficulties in obtaining the necessary funds, and internal ones: fear of failure and insufficient level of own funds. After implementing the innovation, farmers observed an increase in production capacity and a decrease in labor intensity. Thanks to innovations, many respondents were able to expand the area of their operations and influence the development of their farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Marks-Bielska, Renata & Bilyj, Justyna, 2023. "Conditions for Introducing Innovation on Farms," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2023(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:340089
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340089/files/MARKS-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bjerke, Lina & Johansson, Sara, 2022. "Innovation in agriculture: An analysis of Swedish agricultural and non-agricultural firms," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Richard A. D'Aveni & Giovanni Battista Dagnino & Ken G. Smith, 2010. "The age of temporary advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(13), pages 1371-1385, December.
    3. Karolina Babuchowska & Renata Marks-Bielska, 2021. "Determinants of Innovation in Diary Farms in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 1240-1249.
    4. Läpple, Doris & Renwick, Alan & Thorne, Fiona, 2015. "Measuring and understanding the drivers of agricultural innovation: Evidence from Ireland," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    2. Eren Durmus Ozdemir & Saime Mecikoglu, 2016. "A Case Study on Performance Implications of Hybrid Strategy in Automotive Supplier Industry," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 31-43, June.
    3. Daniel Ayisi-Nyarko & Fallys Masambuka-kanchewa & Bernard Obaa, 2024. "Students’ Perceptions of the Role of Various Players in Agricultural Technologies and Innovations Development," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(1), pages 38-56, March.
    4. Yang, Wei & Meyer, Klaus E., 2020. "How do local and foreign firms compete? Competitive actions in an emerging economy," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    5. Lyudmila A. Ramenskaya, 2020. "The concept of ecosystem in economic and management studies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 16-28, September.
    6. Yang, Wei & Meyer, Klaus E., 2019. "How does ownership influence business growth? A competitive dynamics perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 1-1.
    7. Sujata Behera, 2020. "Does the EVA valuation model explain the market value of equity better under changing required return than constant required return?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Elia, Stefano & Giuffrida, Maria & Mariani, Marcello M. & Bresciani, Stefano, 2021. "Resources and digital export: An RBV perspective on the role of digital technologies and capabilities in cross-border e-commerce," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 158-169.
    9. Amrit Tiwana, 2018. "Platform Synergy: Architectural Origins and Competitive Consequences," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 829-848, December.
    10. Hu, Yue & Liu, Chang & Peng, Jiangang, 2021. "Financial inclusion and agricultural total factor productivity growth in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 68-82.
    11. Radovan Savov & Drahoslav Lančarič & Jana Kozáková, 2020. "Size of the Company as the Main Determinant of Talent Management in Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Justyna Grzes-Buklaho, 2018. "Intangible assets as a source of competitiveness of real-estate developers," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 17(4), pages 355-365, December.
    13. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Jing Chen, 2017. "Exploring Performance Determinants of China’s Cable Operators and OTT Service Providers in the Era of Digital Convergence—From the Perspective of an Industry Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Karen Ruckman & Nilesh Saraf & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2015. "Market Positioning by IT Service Vendors Through Imitation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 100-126, March.
    15. Jason P. Davis & Vikas A. Aggarwal, 2020. "Knowledge mobilization in the face of imitation: Microfoundations of knowledge aggregation and firm‐level innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(11), pages 1983-2014, November.
    16. Nawal Chemma, 2021. "Disruptive innovation in a dynamic environment: a winning strategy? An illustration through the analysis of the yoghurt industry in Algeria," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Franz Sinabell & Fabian Unterlass & Peter Walder & Jochen Kantelhardt, 2017. "Austria 2025 – Innovation: A Motor of Growth and Employment in the Rural Economy," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 60604, April.
    18. Zhe OuYang & Peng Cheng & Yang Liu, 2020. "The role of product line breadth, product pre-entry experience, and market uncertainty in explaining followers’ speed of feature entry," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 1221-1249, December.
    19. Halbast Hussein Hamadamin & Tarik Atan, 2019. "The Impact of Strategic Human Resource Management Practices on Competitive Advantage Sustainability: The Mediation of Human Capital Development and Employee Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    20. D Hugh Whittaker & Benjamin Fath & Antje Fiedler, 2020. "Open to competition? Competitive density and the growth of young New Zealand ventures," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 343-358, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:340089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.