IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020i4p834-851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the Method of Criteria Normalisation on the Order Picking Route and Time

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Dmytrow

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the article is the selection of the best criteria for the normalisation method in order to achieve the minimal order picking route and time. Design/Methodology/Approach: When a company utilizes warehouse with the shared storage system, every product can be stored in many, sometimes very distant from each other, locations. Locations were selected by the multiple-criteria decision-making technique – TOPSIS. The research was conducted by means of the simulation methods. Every location was described by three criteria (distance from the I/O point, degree of demand satisfaction and the number of other picked products in the proximity of the analyzed location), for which 37 combinations of weights and 18 normalization formulas were applied. For every combination of weights and normalization method 1000 orders were generated. Findings: The best results were obtained when high weight was assigned to the degree of demand satisfaction. It was hard to indicate unequivocally the best normalization method. However, quotient inversions generally yielded slightly worse results than standard scores and feature scaling. Practical Implications: Obtained results indicate that the presented approach can be useful in real warehouse management. It is a quite versatile method that can be adopted to various situations. Originality/value: Although the routing problem in order picking has already been widely discussed, the literature about the problem of selection of locations in shared storage is quite scarce. Therefore, the presented approach can serve as one method of selection of locations in the shared storage system.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Dmytrow, 2020. "Impact of the Method of Criteria Normalisation on the Order Picking Route and Time," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 834-851.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:4:p:834-851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1717/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yugang Yu & René B.M. Koster & Xiaolong Guo, 2015. "Class-Based Storage with a Finite Number of Items: Using More Classes is not Always Better," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1235-1247, August.
    2. Thomas L. Saaty & Daji Ergu, 2015. "When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1171-1187, November.
    3. Gu, Jinxiang & Goetschalckx, Marc & McGinnis, Leon F., 2010. "Research on warehouse design and performance evaluation: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 539-549, June.
    4. Marek Walesiak, 2018. "The Choice Of Normalization Method And Rankings Of The Set Of Objects Based On Composite Indicator Values," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 19(4), pages 693-710, December.
    5. Pan, Jason Chao-Hsien & Wu, Ming-Hung & Chang, Wen-Liang, 2014. "A travel time estimation model for a high-level picker-to-part system with class-based storage policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1054-1066.
    6. Gue, Kevin R. & Ivanović, Goran & Meller, Russell D., 2012. "A unit-load warehouse with multiple pickup and deposit points and non-traditional aisles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 795-806.
    7. Bhavin Shah & Vivek Khanzode, 2017. "A comprehensive review of warehouse operational issues," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(3), pages 346-378.
    8. de Koster, Rene & Le-Duc, Tho & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2007. "Design and control of warehouse order picking: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 481-501, October.
    9. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    10. H. Donald Ratliff & Arnon S. Rosenthal, 1983. "Order-Picking in a Rectangular Warehouse: A Solvable Case of the Traveling Salesman Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 507-521, June.
    11. Roodbergen, Kees Jan & Vis, Iris F.A., 2009. "A survey of literature on automated storage and retrieval systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 343-362, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Çağla Cergibozan & A. Serdar Tasan, 2019. "Order batching operations: an overview of classification, solution techniques, and future research," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 335-349, January.
    2. Chen, Gang & Feng, Haolin & Luo, Kaiyi & Tang, Yanli, 2021. "Retrieval-oriented storage relocation optimization of an automated storage and retrieval system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    3. Boysen, Nils & de Koster, René & Füßler, David, 2021. "The forgotten sons: Warehousing systems for brick-and-mortar retail chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 361-381.
    4. Zhuang, Yanling & Zhou, Yun & Hassini, Elkafi & Yuan, Yufei & Hu, Xiangpei, 2024. "Improving order picking efficiency through storage assignment optimization in robotic mobile fulfillment systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 718-732.
    5. Boysen, Nils & de Koster, René & Weidinger, Felix, 2019. "Warehousing in the e-commerce era: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 396-411.
    6. Vidal Vieira, José Geraldo & Ramos Toso, Milton & da Silva, João Eduardo Azevedo Ramos & Cabral Ribeiro, Priscilla Cristina, 2017. "An AHP-based framework for logistics operations in distribution centres," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 246-259.
    7. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2020. "Robot scheduling for pod retrieval in a robotic mobile fulfillment system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    8. van der Gaast, Jelmer Pier & Weidinger, Felix, 2022. "A deep learning approach for the selection of an order picking system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 530-543.
    9. Ang, Marcus & Lim, Yun Fong, 2019. "How to optimize storage classes in a unit-load warehouse," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 186-201.
    10. Derhami, Shahab & Smith, Jeffrey S. & Gue, Kevin R., 2020. "A simulation-based optimization approach to design optimal layouts for block stacking warehouses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    11. Nils Boysen & Konrad Stephan & Felix Weidinger, 2019. "Manual order consolidation with put walls: the batched order bin sequencing problem," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(2), pages 169-193, June.
    12. Li Zhou & Huwei Liu & Junhui Zhao & Fan Wang & Jianglong Yang, 2022. "Performance Analysis of Picking Routing Strategies in the Leaf Layout Warehouse," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-28, September.
    13. Boysen, Nils & Emde, Simon & Hoeck, Michael & Kauderer, Markus, 2015. "Part logistics in the automotive industry: Decision problems, literature review and research agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 107-120.
    14. Lu, Wenrong & McFarlane, Duncan & Giannikas, Vaggelis & Zhang, Quan, 2016. "An algorithm for dynamic order-picking in warehouse operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 107-122.
    15. Öztürkoğlu, Ömer & Hoser, Deniz, 2019. "A discrete cross aisle design model for order-picking warehouses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 411-430.
    16. van Gils, Teun & Caris, An & Ramaekers, Katrien & Braekers, Kris & de Koster, René B.M., 2019. "Designing efficient order picking systems: The effect of real-life features on the relationship among planning problems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 47-73.
    17. Weidinger, Felix & Boysen, Nils & Schneider, Michael, 2019. "Picker routing in the mixed-shelves warehouses of e-commerce retailers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 501-515.
    18. Mirzaei, Masoud & Zaerpour, Nima & de Koster, René, 2021. "The impact of integrated cluster-based storage allocation on parts-to-picker warehouse performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. Silva, Allyson & Roodbergen, Kees Jan & Coelho, Leandro C. & Darvish, Maryam, 2022. "Estimating optimal ABC zone sizes in manual warehouses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    20. Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H. & Abedinnia, Hamid & Emde, Simon, 2019. "An integrated model to improve ergonomic and economic performance in order picking by rotating pallets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 516-534.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Multi-criteria decision-making; order picking; TOPSIS; normalisation; simulation methods.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:4:p:834-851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.