IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eph/journl/v9y2014i4n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving performance in for-profit contracts: a study of buyer-seller communication and red tape

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen Welsh VOGES

    (Texas A&M University-San Antonio, San Antonio, United States of America)

Abstract

The use of for-profit contracts remains a popular privatization choice for public sector organizations in the United States. However, challenges with quality service delivery ensue prompting a better understanding of how best to deliver services. Based on the results of a study of 58 buyer (public sector)-seller (private for-profit sector) dyads, the findings suggest that the seller’s level of communication quality is positively related to end-user consumer’s level of customer satisfaction. However, the presence of red tape in the seller’s organization has a moderating and negative impact. Discussion of the findings provides insight into how private sector business organizations can improve performance outcomes with its important public sector customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen Welsh VOGES, 2014. "Improving performance in for-profit contracts: a study of buyer-seller communication and red tape," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 9(4), Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:9:y:2014:i:4:n:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.managementmarketing.ro/pdf/articole/463.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akbar Zaheer & Bill McEvily & Vincenzo Perrone, 1998. "Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 141-159, April.
    2. Jakki Mohr & Robert Spekman, 1994. "Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 135-152, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tahal Radek & Formánek Tomáš, 2020. "Reflection of GDPR by the Czech Population," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 78-94, March.
    2. Khai, Dinh Cong & Thanh, Ngo Quang, 2021. "The impact of institutional pressures and top management regulations on firm performance," MPRA Paper 109673, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sambasivan, Murali & Siew-Phaik, Loke & Abidin Mohamed, Zainal & Choy Leong, Yee, 2013. "Factors influencing strategic alliance outcomes in a manufacturing supply chain: Role of alliance motives, interdependence, asset specificity and relational capital," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 339-351.
    2. Ellegaard, Chris & Andersen, Poul Houman, 2015. "The process of resolving severe conflict in buyer–supplier relationships," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 457-470.
    3. Kim, Yusoon & Choi, Thomas Y., 2021. "Supplier relationship strategies and outcome dualities: An empirical study of embeddedness perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    4. Hsieh, Linda H.Y. & Rodrigues, Suzana B. & Child, John, 2010. "Risk perception and post-formation governance in international joint ventures in Taiwan: The perspective of the foreign partner," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 288-303, September.
    5. Ludwig Bstieler & Martin Hemmert, 2010. "Trust formation in Korean new product alliances: How important are pre-existing social ties?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 299-319, June.
    6. Matthew Murphy & Daniel Arenas & Joan Batista, 2015. "Value Creation in Cross-Sector Collaborations: The Roles of Experience and Alignment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 145-162, August.
    7. Sroka Włodzimierz, 2011. "Problem of Trust in Alliance Networks," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 44(4), pages 101-108, July.
    8. Alimadadi, Siavash & Bengtson, Anna & Salmi, Asta, 2019. "Disruption, dissolution and reconstruction: A dialectical view on inter-organizational relationship development," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    9. Kolloge, Konstantin, 2009. "Die Messung des Kooperationserfolges in der empirischen Forschung: Ergebnisse einer Literaturstudie," Arbeitspapiere 76, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    10. Lui, Steven S. & Ngo, Hang-yue & Hon, Alice H.Y., 2006. "Coercive strategy in interfirm cooperation: Mediating roles of interpersonal and interorganizational trust," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 466-474, April.
    11. Yaoguang Zhong & Ivan Ka Wai Lai & Fangfang Guo & Huajun Tang, 2020. "Effects of Partnership Quality and Information Sharing on Express Delivery Service Performance in the E-commerce Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Felzensztein, Christian & Brodt, Susan E. & Gimmon, Eli, 2014. "Do strategic marketing and social capital really matter in regional clusters? Lessons from an emerging economy of Latin America," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 498-507.
    13. Phuong Thi Minh Nguyen & Khuong Ngoc Mai & Phuong Ngoc Duy Nguyen, 2021. "Alliance Management Practices for Higher Trust, Commitment and Inter-Organizational Relationship Performance: Evidence from Travel Companies in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Laura Poppo & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Todd R. Zenger, 2008. "Examining the Conditional Limits of Relational Governance: Specialized Assets, Performance Ambiguity, and Long‐Standing Ties," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(7), pages 1195-1216, November.
    15. Min, Jae-Woong & Vonortas, Nicholas S. & Kim, YoungJun, 2019. "Commercialization of transferred public technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 10-20.
    16. Oliver Schilke & Karen S. Cook, 2015. "Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 276-297, February.
    17. Cunha, P.A.M.F.V., 2005. "The value of cooperation : Studies on the performance outcomes of interorganizational alliances," Other publications TiSEM 59466e6c-1920-461e-b5e9-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Mora-Valentin, Eva M. & Montoro-Sanchez, Angeles & Guerras-Martin, Luis A., 2004. "Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 17-40, January.
    19. Golonka, Monika, 2015. "Proactive cooperation with strangers: Enhancing complexity of the ICT firms' alliance portfolio and their innovativeness," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 168-178.
    20. Phuong Thi Minh Nguyen & Khuong Ngoc Mai & Phuong Ngoc Duy Nguyen, 2023. "Does Trust Affect Antecedents of Inter-Organizational Governance Mechanisms and Elicit Successful Collaboration via Innovation? An Empirical Study from a Market-Oriented Economy in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:9:y:2014:i:4:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simona Vasilache (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.