IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejn/ejssjr/v6y2018i1p1-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individuals Performance Measurement In Agile Software Development

Author

Listed:
  • Aref Al-Heyasi

    (Szent Istvan University, Hungary)

Abstract

Many organizations in the last years have been shifting to Agile, especially in software development sector, to deliver their projects. Rapid changes in demands, requirements, technologies, and regulations have made it more important for organizations to respond quickly and effectively. Agile provides the flexibility to reconfigure strategies, processes, people, and technologies toward value creation. Agile promises to deliver value through small, potentially shippable product features developed within short iterations. In Agile, there is no one manager who makes all the decisions alone, but all team members participate in making important project decisions. Agile believes that teamwork is essential to deliver high-quality software. The unique characteristics of the team in Agile make it hard to fit with standard HR processes like annual individual performance reviews. This paper introduces the individual performance management in Agile environment and how the annual performance appraisal might not fit with Agile and discusses the alternatives to make a convenient performance evaluation for agile team members.

Suggested Citation

  • Aref Al-Heyasi, 2018. "Individuals Performance Measurement In Agile Software Development," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 6(1), pages 1-6.
    • Handle: RePEc:ejn:ejssjr:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:1-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/EJSS-6.1.1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adler, Seymour & Campion, Michael & Colquitt, Alan & Grubb, Amy & Murphy, Kevin & Ollander-Krane, Rob & Pulakos, Elaine D., 2016. "Getting Rid of Performance Ratings: Genius or Folly? A Debate," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 219-252, June.
    2. Christoph Schmidt, 2016. "Agile Software Development," Progress in IS, in: Agile Software Development Teams, chapter 0, pages 7-35, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyriaki Papadopoulou, 2020. "Comparative Review Of Performance Measurement Methods Effectiveness," Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY "NEOFIT RILSKI", BLAGOEVGRAD, vol. 17(1), pages 127-139.
    2. Nasser Saad Al Kahtani & Sulphey M. M., 2022. "A Study on How Psychological Capital, Social Capital, Workplace Wellbeing, and Employee Engagement Relate to Task Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    3. Gupta, Manjul & George, Joey F. & Xia, Weidong, 2019. "Relationships between IT department culture and agile software development practices: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 13-24.
    4. Shivam Gupta & Vinayak A. Drave & Surajit Bag & Zongwei Luo, 2019. "Leveraging Smart Supply Chain and Information System Agility for Supply Chain Flexibility," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 547-564, June.
    5. Rafikul Islam & Nagendran Periaiah, 2023. "Overcoming the pitfalls in employee performance evaluation: An application of ratings mode of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 19(2), pages 127-157.
    6. Florin DUMITRIU & Gabriela MESNITA & Laura Diana RADU, 2019. "Challenges and Solutions of Applying Large-Scale Agile at Organization-al Level," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(3), pages 61-71.
    7. Berea Cristi, 2018. "Negotiation Analysis. The Context," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 284-288, July.
    8. Feldmann Anna, 2021. "The 5 P’s to success in intrapreneurial programs," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 71(1), pages 5-37, March.
    9. C. J. Torrecilla-Salinas & O. Troyer & M. J. Escalona & M. Mejías, 2019. "A Delphi-based expert judgment method applied to the validation of a mature Agile framework for Web development projects," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 9-40, March.
    10. Marinho, Marcelo & Amorim, Luís & Camara, Rafael & Oliveira, Brigitte Renata & Sobral, Marcos & Sampaio, Suzana, 2021. "Happier and further by going together: The importance of software team behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Paloma Lanza‐León & Lidia Sanchez‐Ruiz & David Cantarero‐Prieto, 2021. "Kanban system applications in healthcare services: A literature review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 2062-2078, November.
    12. Čelesnik Goran & Radujković Mladen & Vrečko Igor, 2018. "Resolving Companies in Crisis: Agile Crisis Project Management," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 51(4), pages 223-237, December.
    13. Appiah, Gloria & Bonsu, Samuel K. & Sarpong, David, 2021. "The unpowered customer: Co-creation as tactics of the weak," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 317-326.
    14. Damjan Vavpotič & Marko Robnik-Šikonja & Tomaž Hovelja, 2020. "Exploring the Relations Between Net Benefits of IT Projects and CIOs’ Perception of Quality of Software Development Disciplines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 347-360, August.
    15. Adem Baltacı, 2021. "Helping intention, trust and performance appraisal in the context of culture, power and group: a scenario-based experiment," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 488-507, June.
    16. Shikha Sharma & Sanjeev K. Sharma, 2020. "Probing the Links Between Team Resilience, Competitive Advantage, and Organizational Effectiveness: Evidence from Information Technology Industry," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 289-307, July.
    17. Rabbani Mohammadmahdi & Alavi Seyyed Babak, 2023. "Does Feedback Seeking Always Improve Performance? Investigating the Roles of Feedback Seeking Content and Frequency in Determining Goal Achievement and Behavior-Related Performance," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 7-24, January.
    18. Robert Modransky & Silvia Jakabova & Michal Hanak & Albert Olah, 2020. "Lean and Agile Project Management and the Challenges for its Implementation in SMEs in Czech Republic," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 9(1), pages 413-440, July.
    19. Mohamed Amine Ferrag & Leandros Maglaras & Abdelouahid Derhab & Helge Janicke, 2020. "Authentication schemes for smart mobile devices: threat models, countermeasures, and open research issues," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 317-348, February.
    20. K. C. Bhosale & P. J. Pawar, 2019. "Material flow optimisation of production planning and scheduling problem in flexible manufacturing system by real coded genetic algorithm (RCGA)," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 381-423, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejn:ejssjr:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:1-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Esra Barakli (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.