IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v93y2020icp54-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of the benefits of mobile fare payment technology from the user and operator perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Brakewood, Candace
  • Ziedan, Abubakr
  • Hendricks, Sara J.
  • Barbeau, Sean J.
  • Joslin, Ann

Abstract

Recently, public transit systems have seen declining ridership levels in most American cities, and transit agencies are seeking strategies to counteract this negative trend. One emerging strategy uses mobile technologies for fare payment, which could improve the transit user experience and potentially attract or retain riders. However, there has been limited prior research evaluating the benefits of new mobile fare payment technologies after real-world deployment. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate emerging payment technologies from both the transit user and operator perspectives. Surveys of bus riders in Tallahassee, Florida were conducted before and after a two-month period in which a mobile fare payment application (“app”) was deployed throughout the bus system. Bus operators, who are responsible for fare validation, were also surveyed at the end of the study period. The results reveal that most app users reported spending less time purchasing a transit pass and less time boarding the bus, which could result in travel time savings from the user perspective. Despite these benefits, it was hypothesized that app users would increase the number of trips they made on transit; however, the user surveys provided limited evidence to support this. From the operator perspective, drivers reported spending less time collecting fares and observed that app users spent less time boarding the bus, which could lead to dwell time reductions after adoption levels increase. As transit users increasingly rely on mobile technologies, these findings are critical for transit agencies to justify initial deployment or expansion of mobile fare payment technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Brakewood, Candace & Ziedan, Abubakr & Hendricks, Sara J. & Barbeau, Sean J. & Joslin, Ann, 2020. "An evaluation of the benefits of mobile fare payment technology from the user and operator perspectives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 54-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:93:y:2020:i:c:p:54-66
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.04.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X19304056
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.04.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boisjoly, Geneviève & Grisé, Emily & Maguire, Meadhbh & Veillette, Marie-Pier & Deboosere, Robbin & Berrebi, Emma & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2018. "Invest in the ride: A 14 year longitudinal analysis of the determinants of public transport ridership in 25 North American cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 434-445.
    2. Candace Brakewood & Kari Watkins, 2019. "A literature review of the passenger benefits of real-time transit information," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 327-356, May.
    3. Bagchi, M. & White, P.R., 2005. "The potential of public transport smart card data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 464-474, September.
    4. Miller, Caroline & Savage, Ian, 2017. "Does the demand response to transit fare increases vary by income?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 79-86.
    5. Stopher,Peter, 2012. "Collecting, Managing, and Assessing Data Using Sample Surveys," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521863117.
    6. Sharaby, Nir & Shiftan, Yoram, 2012. "The impact of fare integration on travel behavior and transit ridership," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 63-70.
    7. Stopher,Peter, 2012. "Collecting, Managing, and Assessing Data Using Sample Surveys," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521681872.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhi Su & Ruijie Cao, 2023. "Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Urban Carbon Emission Intensity: From the Perspective of Green and Low-Carbon Travel and Clean Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Uğur Baç, 2020. "An Integrated SWARA-WASPAS Group Decision Making Framework to Evaluate Smart Card Systems for Public Transportation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Ziedan, Abubakr & Hightower, Ashley & Lima, Luiz & Brakewood, Candace, 2024. "The app or the cap? Which fare innovation affects bus ridership?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 247-258.
    4. Verkijika, Silas Formunyuy & Neneh, Brownhilder Ngek, 2021. "Standing up for or against: A text-mining study on the recommendation of mobile payment apps," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aluisio Goulart Silva & Maurizio Canavari & Alcido Elenor Wander, 2018. "Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for integrated production label on common beans," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(1), pages 11-28.
    2. Diab, Ehab & Kasraian, Dena & Miller, Eric J. & Shalaby, Amer, 2020. "The rise and fall of transit ridership across Canada: Understanding the determinants," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 101-112.
    3. Nina Verzosa & Stephen Greaves & Chinh Ho & Mark Davis, 2021. "Stated willingness to participate in travel surveys: a cross-country and cross-methods comparison," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1311-1327, June.
    4. Nora KOTTMANN & Laura DALES, 2023. "Doing Intimacy in Pandemic Times: Findings of a Large-Scale Survey Among Singles in Japan," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 3-26.
    5. Punyabeet Sarangi & M. Manoj, 2022. "Analysis of activity participation and time use decisions of partners: the context of low-and high-income households," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1017-1058, June.
    6. (Giancarlo) Falcocchio, John C. & Malik, Awais & Kontokosta, Constantine E., 2018. "A data-driven methodology for equitable value-capture financing of public transit operations and maintenance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 107-115.
    7. Maruyama, Takuya & Fukahori, Tatsuya, 2020. "Households with every member out-of-home (HEMO): Comparison using the 1984, 1997, and 2012 household travel surveys in Kumamoto, Japan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Ehab Diab & Jamie DeWeese & Nick Chaloux & Ahmed El-Geneidy, 2021. "Adjusting the service? Understanding the factors affecting bus ridership over time at the route level in Montréal, Canada," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2765-2786, October.
    9. Lourdes Diaz Olvera & Didier Plat & Pascal Pochet, 2015. "Assessment of mobility inequalities and income data collection. Methodological issues and a case study (Douala, Cameroon) [Evaluation des inégalités de mobilité et recueil des revenus. Questions mé," Post-Print halshs-01235185, HAL.
    10. Lourdes Diaz Olvera & Didier Plat & Pascal Pochet, 2015. "Assessment of mobility inequalities and income data collection. Methodological issues and a case study (Douala, Cameroon)," Post-Print halshs-01205776, HAL.
    11. Canoquena, Joao & King, Mark, 2015. "Adaptive nature of coordinated road traffic injury prevention responses in some OECD countries," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 81-88.
    12. Rösch, Christine & Varela Villarreal, Jessica, 2021. "Perception of EU citizens on engineered biocatalytic solar fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Nagwan AlQershi & Sany Sanuri Mohd Mokhtar & Zakaria Abas, 2022. "The influence of structural capital on the relationship between CRM implementation and the performance of manufacturing SMEs," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(3), pages 1205-1218, June.
    14. Suman, Hemant K. & Bolia, Nomesh B. & Tiwari, Geetam, 2017. "Comparing public bus transport service attributes in Delhi and Mumbai: Policy implications for improving bus services in Delhi," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 63-74.
    15. Manca, Francesco & Sivakumar, Aruna & Daina, Nicolò & Axsen, Jonn & Polak, John W, 2020. "Modelling the influence of peers’ attitudes on choice behaviour: Theory and empirical application on electric vehicle preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 278-298.
    16. Chen, Ruoyu & Zhou, Jiangping, 2022. "Fare adjustment’s impacts on travel patterns and farebox revenue: An empirical study based on longitudinal smartcard data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 111-133.
    17. Diaz Olvera, Lourdes & Plat, Didier & Pochet, Pascal, 2015. "Assessment of mobility inequalities and income data collection. Methodological issues and a case study (Douala, Cameroon)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 180-188.
    18. José Moore & Juan-Antonio Carrasco & Alejandro Tudela, 2013. "Exploring the links between personal networks, time use, and the spatial distribution of social contacts," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 773-788, July.
    19. Firnkorn, Jörg, 2012. "Triangulation of two methods measuring the impacts of a free-floating carsharing system in Germany," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1654-1672.
    20. Liping Ge & Malek Sarhani & Stefan Voß & Lin Xie, 2021. "Review of Transit Data Sources: Potentials, Challenges and Complementarity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-37, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:93:y:2020:i:c:p:54-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.