IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v48y2021i3d10.1007_s11116-020-10096-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stated willingness to participate in travel surveys: a cross-country and cross-methods comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Verzosa

    (University of Sydney)

  • Stephen Greaves

    (University of Sydney)

  • Chinh Ho

    (University of Sydney)

  • Mark Davis

    (Ipsos Public Affairs, Australia and New Zealand)

Abstract

Travel surveys are the primary source of data that feed into the analysis and modeling of travel behaviour. Numerous studies have found that the survey method, be it pen and paper, online, interview, smartphone app, or GPS, impacts participation, diligence and accuracy of reporting. In turn, this can lead to bias both in terms of the socio-demographic mix of respondents, and under/mis-reporting of trip information. To date, there is limited understanding of if/how preferences for particular travel survey methods vary across countries. In 2014, a survey of 17,510 adults from 24 countries was undertaken by an internationally-renowned market research firm to assess stated preferences for different travel survey methods. Following an assessment of how preferences vary by country and method, the current paper focuses on responses from five of these countries with long-standing household travel surveys—Australia, USA, France, Germany, and Japan. Results suggest that for a given survey method, willingness to participate in travel surveys varies across countries and within each group of respondents (classified by their socio-demographic characteristics). Australians tend to indicate a higher willingness to participate across the different survey methods compared to their counterparts, particularly from Japan. In terms of socio-demographic characteristics, younger respondents indicate a greater willingness to engage in travel surveys regardless of the method, while females are more likely to prefer diary-based methods than mobile-based methods. Respondents also appear to trade-off effort in completing travel surveys using traditional methods against privacy concerns with mobile-based methods. Results suggest that that there is no ‘one size fits all’ methodology for travel surveys, with designers needing to carefully consider both socio-demographic and cultural differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Verzosa & Stephen Greaves & Chinh Ho & Mark Davis, 2021. "Stated willingness to participate in travel surveys: a cross-country and cross-methods comparison," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1311-1327, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:48:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11116-020-10096-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-020-10096-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-020-10096-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-020-10096-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2015. "Quantified Traveler: Travel Feedback Meets the Cloud to Change Behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2vw4n4zc, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Engelen, Andreas & Brettel, Malte, 2011. "Assessing cross-cultural marketing theory and research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 516-523, May.
    3. Hubert Verreault & Catherine Morency, 2018. "Integration of a phone-based household travel survey and a web-based student travel survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 89-103, January.
    4. Soares, Ana Maria & Farhangmehr, Minoo & Shoham, Aviv, 2007. "Hofstede's dimensions of culture in international marketing studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 277-284, March.
    5. Stopher,Peter, 2012. "Collecting, Managing, and Assessing Data Using Sample Surveys," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521863117, October.
    6. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2015. "How to Combine Survey Media (Web, Telephone, Face-to-Face): Lyon and Rhône-alps Case Study," Post-Print halshs-01663683, HAL.
    7. Stopher, Peter R. & Greaves, Stephen P., 2007. "Household travel surveys: Where are we going?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 367-381, June.
    8. Stopher,Peter, 2012. "Collecting, Managing, and Assessing Data Using Sample Surveys," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521681872, October.
    9. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2018. "Mixed-modes survey media and data comparability issues: a French case study," Post-Print hal-01909405, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Firnkorn, Jörg, 2012. "Triangulation of two methods measuring the impacts of a free-floating carsharing system in Germany," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1654-1672.
    2. Takuya Maruyama & Kenta Hosotani & Tomoki Kawano, 2021. "Inferring proxy response in household travel surveys with unknown completer using a group-based choice model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 283-302, February.
    3. Aluisio Goulart Silva & Maurizio Canavari & Alcido Elenor Wander, 2018. "Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for integrated production label on common beans," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(1), pages 11-28.
    4. Nora KOTTMANN & Laura DALES, 2023. "Doing Intimacy in Pandemic Times: Findings of a Large-Scale Survey Among Singles in Japan," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 3-26.
    5. Punyabeet Sarangi & M. Manoj, 2022. "Analysis of activity participation and time use decisions of partners: the context of low-and high-income households," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1017-1058, June.
    6. Maruyama, Takuya & Fukahori, Tatsuya, 2020. "Households with every member out-of-home (HEMO): Comparison using the 1984, 1997, and 2012 household travel surveys in Kumamoto, Japan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Romero, Cláudia Buhamra Abreu & Laroche, Michel & Aurup, Golam Mohammad & Ferraz, Sofia Batista, 2018. "Ethnicity and acculturation of environmental attitudes and behaviors: A cross-cultural study with Brazilians in Canada," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 300-309.
    8. Lourdes Diaz Olvera & Didier Plat & Pascal Pochet, 2015. "Assessment of mobility inequalities and income data collection. Methodological issues and a case study (Douala, Cameroon) [Evaluation des inégalités de mobilité et recueil des revenus. Questions mé," Post-Print halshs-01235185, HAL.
    9. Lourdes Diaz Olvera & Didier Plat & Pascal Pochet, 2015. "Assessment of mobility inequalities and income data collection. Methodological issues and a case study (Douala, Cameroon)," Post-Print halshs-01205776, HAL.
    10. Brakewood, Candace & Ziedan, Abubakr & Hendricks, Sara J. & Barbeau, Sean J. & Joslin, Ann, 2020. "An evaluation of the benefits of mobile fare payment technology from the user and operator perspectives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 54-66.
    11. Millan, Elena & De Pelsmacker, Patrick & Wright, Len Tiu, 2013. "Clothing consumption in two recent EU Member States: A cross-cultural study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 975-982.
    12. Canoquena, Joao & King, Mark, 2015. "Adaptive nature of coordinated road traffic injury prevention responses in some OECD countries," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 81-88.
    13. Rösch, Christine & Varela Villarreal, Jessica, 2021. "Perception of EU citizens on engineered biocatalytic solar fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    14. Lorente-Páramo, Ángel J. & Hernández-García, Ángel & Chaparro-Peláez, Julián, 2020. "Influence of cultural dimensions on promotional e-mail effectiveness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    15. Lorente-Páramo, Ángel J. & Chaparro-Peláez, Julián & Hernández-García, Ángel, 2020. "How to improve e-mail click-through rates – A national culture approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    16. Nagwan AlQershi & Sany Sanuri Mohd Mokhtar & Zakaria Abas, 2022. "The influence of structural capital on the relationship between CRM implementation and the performance of manufacturing SMEs," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(3), pages 1205-1218, June.
    17. Suman, Hemant K. & Bolia, Nomesh B. & Tiwari, Geetam, 2017. "Comparing public bus transport service attributes in Delhi and Mumbai: Policy implications for improving bus services in Delhi," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 63-74.
    18. Strese, Steffen & Adams, Daniel R. & Flatten, Tessa C. & Brettel, Malte, 2016. "Corporate culture and absorptive capacity: The moderating role of national culture dimensions on innovation management," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1149-1168.
    19. Nicoletta D’Angelo & Antonino Abbruzzo & Mauro Ferrante & Giada Adelfio & Marcello Chiodi, 2024. "GPS data on tourists: a spatial analysis on road networks," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 108(3), pages 477-499, September.
    20. Manca, Francesco & Sivakumar, Aruna & Daina, Nicolò & Axsen, Jonn & Polak, John W, 2020. "Modelling the influence of peers’ attitudes on choice behaviour: Theory and empirical application on electric vehicle preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 278-298.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:48:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11116-020-10096-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.