IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v149y2024icp59-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender equality through sustainable transport policy

Author

Listed:
  • Nasrin, Sharmin
  • Bunker, Jonathan

Abstract

Bangladesh needs to improve women's health, security, convenience, and financial independence, particularly regarding urban mobility. An inefficient and unaffordable urban transport system limits women's access to better job opportunities, hindering their personal growth. This study aims to achieve sustainable development in women's mobility. It attempts to identify the most preferred policy option among different hypothetical scenarios. The importance of different variables using a mixed-method approach is also analyzed. Discussion workshops and a hypothetical travel survey were conducted with low, middle, and high-income working and non-working women. The most preferred policy options were 'walk with the organized vendor,' 'living further away with better living standard,' 'subsidized public transport,' 'app-based private shuttle,' and then Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Identifying these can help policymakers and transport planners to achieve sustainable transport options.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasrin, Sharmin & Bunker, Jonathan, 2024. "Gender equality through sustainable transport policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 59-79.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:149:y:2024:i:c:p:59-79
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.02.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24000362
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.02.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tilley, Sara & Houston, Donald, 2016. "The gender turnaround: Young women now travelling more than young men," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 349-358.
    2. Sybil Derrible, 2017. "Complexity in future cities: the rise of networked infrastructure," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(0), pages 68-86, August.
    3. Kemp, Stanley J. & Zaradic, Patricia & Hansen, Frank, 2007. "An approach for determining relative input parameter importance and significance in artificial neural networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 326-334.
    4. Chantal Duchene, 2011. "Gender and Transport," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2011/11, OECD Publishing.
    5. Vahid Najafi Moghaddam Gilani & Seyed Mohsen Hosseinian & Meisam Ghasedi & Mohammad Nikookar, 2021. "Data-Driven Urban Traffic Accident Analysis and Prediction Using Logit and Machine Learning-Based Pattern Recognition Models," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-11, May.
    6. Jelena Simićević & Nada Milosavljević & Vladimir Djoric, 2016. "Gender differences in travel behaviour and willingness to adopt sustainable behaviour," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 527-537, July.
    7. Hensher, David A. & Ton, Tu T., 2000. "A comparison of the predictive potential of artificial neural networks and nested logit models for commuter mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 155-172, September.
    8. Nasrin, Sharmin & Bunker, Jonathan, 2021. "Analyzing significant variables for choosing different modes by female travelers," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 312-329.
    9. Marie Thynell, 2016. "The Quest for Gender-Sensitive and Inclusive Transport Policies in Growing Asian Cities," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 72-82.
    10. Mohammad Ali Arman & Navid Khademi & Matthieu de Lapparent, 2018. "Women’s mode and trip structure choices in daily activity-travel: a developing country perspective," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 845-877, November.
    11. Caitlin D. Cottrill & Sybil Derrible, 2015. "Leveraging Big Data for the Development of Transport Sustainability Indicators," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 45-64, January.
    12. Y. Parvizi & M. Heshmati, 2015. "Detection of the effects of management and physical factors on forest soil carbon stock variability in semiarid conditions using parametric and nonparametric methods," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(10), pages 448-455.
    13. Tanu Priya Uteng & Jeff Turner, 2019. "Addressing the Linkages between Gender and Transport in Low- and Middle-Income Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-34, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nasrin, Sharmin & Bunker, Jonathan, 2021. "Analyzing significant variables for choosing different modes by female travelers," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 312-329.
    2. Firoozi Yeganeh, Sayna & Khademi, Navid & Farahani, Hojatollah & Besharat, Mohammad Ali, 2022. "A qualitative exploration of factors influencing women's intention to use shared taxis: A study on the characteristics of urban commuting behavior in Iran," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 90-104.
    3. Borker, Girija, 2024. "Understanding the constraints to women’s use of urban public transport in developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Alejandro Ortega Hortelano & Monica Grosso & Gary Haq & Anastasios Tsakalidis, 2021. "Women in Transport Research and Innovation: A European Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Giansoldati, Marco & Rotaris, Lucia & Scorrano, Mariangela & Danielis, Romeo, 2020. "Does electric car knowledge influence car choice? Evidence from a hybrid choice model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Nijkamp, Peter & Reggiani, Aura & Tsang, Wai Fai, 2004. "Comparative modelling of interregional transport flows: Applications to multimodal European freight transport," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 584-602, June.
    7. Danaf, Mazen & Atasoy, Bilge & de Azevedo, Carlos Lima & Ding-Mastera, Jing & Abou-Zeid, Maya & Cox, Nathaniel & Zhao, Fang & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2019. "Context-aware stated preferences with smartphone-based travel surveys," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 35-50.
    8. Te Ma & Mahdi Aghaabbasi & Mujahid Ali & Rosilawati Zainol & Amin Jan & Abdeliazim Mustafa Mohamed & Abdullah Mohamed, 2022. "Nonlinear Relationships between Vehicle Ownership and Household Travel Characteristics and Built Environment Attributes in the US Using the XGBT Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Brain, Isabel & Prieto, Joaquin, 2021. "Understanding changes in the geography of opportunity over time: the case of Santiago, Chile," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109915, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Cottrill, Caitlin D., 2020. "MaaS surveillance: Privacy considerations in mobility as a service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 50-57.
    11. Javier Turienzo & Pablo Cabanelas & Jesús F. Lampón, 2022. "The Mobility Industry Trends Through the Lens of the Social Analysis: A Multi-Level Perspective Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    12. Mingwei He & Jianbo Li & Zhuangbin Shi & Yang Liu & Chunyan Shuai & Jie Liu, 2022. "Exploring the Nonlinear and Threshold Effects of Travel Distance on the Travel Mode Choice across Different Groups: An Empirical Study of Guiyang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-23, November.
    13. Breno Tostes de Gomes Garcia & Diana Mery Messias Lopes & Ilton Curty Leal Junior & José Carlos Cesar Amorim & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva & Vanessa de Almeida Guimarães, 2019. "Analysis of the Performance of Transporting Soybeans from Mato Grosso for Export: A Case Study of the Tapajós-Teles Pires Waterway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, November.
    14. Yijun Liu & Xiaokun Jin & Yunrui Zhang, 2024. "Identifying risks in temporal supernetworks: an IO-SuperPageRank algorithm," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Viacheslav Morozov & Vladimir Shepelev & Viktor Kostyrchenko, 2022. "Modeling the Operation of Signal-Controlled Intersections with Different Lane Occupancy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Mao Ye & Yajing Chen & Guixin Yang & Bo Wang & Qizhou Hu, 2020. "Mixed Logit Models for Travelers’ Mode Shifting Considering Bike-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Xu, JieLan, 2020. "Generational trends of gendered mobility: How do they interact with geographical contexts?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. Ralf-Martin Soe & Lill Sarv & Mila Gasco-Hernandez, 2022. "Systematic Mapping of Long-Term Urban Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, January.
    19. Alwosheel, Ahmad & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Chorus, Caspar G., 2018. "Is your dataset big enough? Sample size requirements when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 167-182.
    20. Bruce Thompson & Bernard Obika, 2020. "Advancing Applied Research in High Volume Transport in Low-Income Countries in Africa and South Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-6, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:149:y:2024:i:c:p:59-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.