IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v36y2000i3p155-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of the predictive potential of artificial neural networks and nested logit models for commuter mode choice

Author

Listed:
  • Hensher, David A.
  • Ton, Tu T.

Abstract

Research in the field of artificial intelligence systems has been exploring the use of artificial neural networks (ANN) as a framework within which many traffic and transport problems can be studied. One appeal of ANN is their use of pattern association and error correction to represent a problem. This contrasts with the random utility maximisation rule in discrete choice modelling. ANN enables a full set of human perceptions about a particular problem to be represented by artificial networks of neurons. A claim of ANN is that it can tackle the problem of travel demand forecasting and modelling as well if not better than the discrete choice approach. The use of such tools in studying individual traveller behaviour thus opens up an opportunity to consider the extent to which there are representation frameworks which complement or replace discrete choice methods. This paper explores the merits of neural networks by comparing the predictive capability of ANN and nested logit models in the context of commuter mode choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Hensher, David A. & Ton, Tu T., 2000. "A comparison of the predictive potential of artificial neural networks and nested logit models for commuter mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 155-172, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:36:y:2000:i:3:p:155-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554599000307
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:36:y:2000:i:3:p:155-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.