IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v326y2023i2d10.1007_s10479-022-04540-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Charting the managerial and theoretical evolutionary path of AHP using thematic and systematic review: a decadal (2012–2021) study

Author

Listed:
  • Vijay Pereira

    (NEOMA Business School, Reims Campus)

  • Umesh Bamel

    (International Management Institute New Delhi)

Abstract

Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) has evolved since its inception and has contributed mainly to multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) to solve complex problems. It is a widespread technique that uses group decision-making approach to solve problems in business operations, mathematics, and numerous other scientific fields. While its applications are numerous, a handful of researchers have studied the growth trajectory of AHP. Whilst these seminal works have discussed the evolution of AHP in different contexts and using contemporary techniques, we complement them by presenting and reflecting on the unchartered and pressing need of charting the managerial and theoretical evolution of AHP, over the last decade. We do this through a systematic and thematic review of the extant literature. This study uses the Scopus database to extract papers published between 2012 and 2021 in decision science with an overlap with operations research and information systems. The study follows Tranfield et al. (2003)’s guidelines to understand the past trends of AHP along three key dimensions and offers future directions. The study also showcases key trends using historiography and uses data visualization techniques to understand the use of AHP with other MCDM techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Vijay Pereira & Umesh Bamel, 2023. "Charting the managerial and theoretical evolutionary path of AHP using thematic and systematic review: a decadal (2012–2021) study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 635-651, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:326:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04540-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04540-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-04540-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-022-04540-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    2. Ali Emrouznejad & Marianna Marra, 2017. "The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6653-6675, November.
    3. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine, 2020. "XOR analytic hierarchy process and its application in the renewable energy sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Kannan Govindan & Mia Hasanagic, 2018. "A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 278-311, January.
    5. Shapiro, Arnold F. & Koissi, Marie-Claire, 2017. "Fuzzy logic modifications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 189-202.
    6. Abhijit Majumdar & Sanjib Kumar Sinha & Mahesh Shaw & K. Mathiyazhagan, 2021. "Analysing the vulnerability of green clothing supply chains in South and Southeast Asia using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(3), pages 752-771, February.
    7. Durbach, Ian & Lahdelma, Risto & Salminen, Pekka, 2014. "The analytic hierarchy process with stochastic judgements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 552-559.
    8. Wolfgang Ossadnik & Stefanie Schinke & Ralf H. Kaspar, 2016. "Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 421-457, March.
    9. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 794-801.
    10. Rakesh D. Raut & Sachin S. Kamble & Manoj Kumar Jha, 2016. "A combined confirmatory factor analysis and fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process-TOPSIS (CFAT) framework for measurement of airline service quality," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(3), pages 347-386.
    11. Majumdar, Abhijit & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar & Agarwal, Aastha & Prajapat, Kanika, 2021. "A new case of rank reversal in analytic hierarchy process due to aggregation of cost and benefit criteria," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    12. Suman Gothwal & Rajeev Saha, 2015. "Plant location selection of a manufacturing industry using analytic hierarchy process approach," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(2), pages 235-255.
    13. P.L. Biju & P.R. Shalij & G.V. Prabhushankar, 2017. "An evaluation tool for sustainable new product development using analytic hierarchy process approach," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 393-413.
    14. G. Sakthivel & Bernard W. Ikua, 2017. "Failure mode and effect analysis using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and GRA TOPSIS in manufacturing industry," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(4), pages 466-484.
    15. Dong, Yucheng & Hong, Wei-Chiang & Xu, Yinfeng & Yu, Shui, 2013. "Numerical scales generated individually for analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 654-662.
    16. Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Luis Martínez, 2020. "Analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy sorting: An analytic hierarchy process–based method for fuzzy classification in sorting problems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(6), pages 928-947, June.
    17. E. M. Murgado-Armenteros & M. Gutiérrez-Salcedo & F. J. Torres-Ruiz & M. J. Cobo, 2015. "Analysing the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research through science mapping analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 519-557, January.
    18. Amarnath Bose, 2020. "Using genetic algorithm to improve consistency and retain authenticity in the analytic hierarchy process," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(4), pages 1070-1092, December.
    19. Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman & Rommert Dekker & Jan van den Berg, 2010. "A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(12), pages 2405-2416, December.
    20. Seyed Saeed Hosseinian & Hamidreza Navidi & Abas Hajfathaliha, 2012. "A New Linear Programming Method for Weights Generation and Group Decision Making in the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 233-254, May.
    21. Dariush Akbarian, 2020. "A new DEA ranking system based on interval cross efficiency and interval analytic hierarchy process methods," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(3), pages 344-363.
    22. Mehdi Tabaroki & Changiz Valmohammadi & Nader Khalesi, 2019. "Identification and prioritisation of the critical success factors for research project-based organisations using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(3), pages 354-371.
    23. K.R. Sinimole, 2012. "Performance evaluation of the hospital services - a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 112-130.
    24. De Marinis, Pietro & Sali, Guido, 2020. "Participatory analytic hierarchy process for resource allocation in agricultural development projects," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    25. Mital, Monika & Del Giudice, Manlio & Papa, Armando, 2018. "Comparing supply chain risks for multiple product categories with cognitive mapping and Analytic Hierarchy Process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 159-170.
    26. G. Sakthivel & Bernard W. Ikua, 2019. "A novel approach for failure mode and effect analysis in propeller shaft manufacturing industry using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and GRA VIKOR," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(4), pages 371-393.
    27. Grošelj, Petra & Zadnik Stirn, Lidija, 2012. "Acceptable consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 417-420.
    28. Ahn, Byeong Seok, 2017. "The analytic hierarchy process with interval preference statements," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 177-185.
    29. Paweł Karczmarek & Witold Pedrycz & Adam Kiersztyn, 2021. "Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Graphical Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 463-481, April.
    30. Wen-Yu Chen & Chia-Yuan Hsu, 2012. "Assessing Travel Business Partners Using the Critical Incident Technique and the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Tourism Economics, , vol. 18(2), pages 295-310, April.
    31. Kamal Kumar Mittal & Pramod Kumar Jain & Dinesh Kumar, 2018. "Optimal selection of modular products in reconfigurable manufacturing systems using analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(4), pages 521-537.
    32. Faisal Talib & Mohammad Asjad, 2019. "Prioritisation and selection of non-traditional machining processes and their criteria using analytic hierarchy process approach," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 522-546.
    33. M. Ilangkumaran & P. Shanmugam & G. Sakthivel & K. Visagavel, 2014. "Failure mode and effect analysis using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 296-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ágoston, Kolos Csaba & Csató, László, 2024. "A lexicographically optimal completion for pairwise comparison matrices with missing entries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(3), pages 1078-1086.
    2. Jia Shao & Shuya Zhong & Mi Tian & Yuanyuan Liu, 2024. "Combining fuzzy MCDM with Kano model and FMEA: a novel 3-phase MCDM method for reliable assessment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 725-765, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatih Tüysüz, 2018. "Simulated Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets-Based Approach for Modeling Uncertainty in AHP Method," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 801-817, May.
    2. Tomasz Zema & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Models of Electricity Price Forecasting: Bibliometric Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Gerda Ana Melnik-Leroy & Gintautas Dzemyda, 2021. "How to Influence the Results of MCDM?—Evidence of the Impact of Cognitive Biases," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 794-801.
    5. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine, 2020. "XOR analytic hierarchy process and its application in the renewable energy sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Hana Tomaskova & Martin Kopecky, 2020. "Specialization of Business Process Model and Notation Applications in Medicine—A Review," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-42, October.
    7. Vilker Zucolotto Pessin & Luciana Harue Yamane & Renato Ribeiro Siman, 2022. "Smart bibliometrics: an integrated method of science mapping and bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3695-3718, June.
    8. Montecchi, Matteo & Plangger, Kirk & West, Douglas C., 2021. "Supply chain transparency: A bibliometric review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    9. Zhao, Guoqing & Xie, Xiaotian & Wang, Yi & Liu, Shaofeng & Jones, Paul & Lopez, Carmen, 2024. "Barrier analysis to improve big data analytics capability of the maritime industry: A mixed-method approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    10. Pereira, Vijay & Bamel, Umesh & Temouri, Yama & Budhwar, Pawan & Del Giudice, Manlio, 2023. "Mapping the evolution, current state of affairs and future research direction of managing cross-border knowledge for innovation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    11. Israel R. Orimoloye & Olusola O. Ololade, 2021. "Global trends assessment of environmental health degradation studies from 1990 to 2018," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 3251-3264, March.
    12. Gisleine Carmo & Luiz Flávio Felizardo & Valderí Castro Alcântara & Cristiane Aparecida Silva & José Willer Prado, 2023. "The impact of Jürgen Habermas’s scientific production: a scientometric review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1853-1875, March.
    13. Manuel Castriotta & Michela Loi & Elona Marku & Ludovica Moi, 2021. "Disentangling the corporate entrepreneurship construct: conceptualizing through co-words," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2821-2863, April.
    14. Saumyaranjan Sahoo & Satish Kumar & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Weng Marc Lim & J. Christopher Westland & Ashwani Kumar, 2024. "Blockchain for sustainable supply chain management: trends and ways forward," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1563-1618, September.
    15. Liu, Fang & Chen, Ya-Ru & Zhou, Da-Hai, 2023. "A two-dimensional approach to flexibility degree of XOR numbers with application to group decision making," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 267-287.
    16. María del Pilar Casado-Belmonte & Gema María Marín-Carrillo & Eduardo Terán-Yépez & María de las Mercedes Capobianco-Uriarte, 2020. "What Is Going on with the Research into the Internationalization of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)? An Intellectual Structure Analysis into the State-of-the-Art (1990–2018)," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-30, February.
    17. Paweł Karczmarek & Witold Pedrycz & Adam Kiersztyn, 2021. "Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Graphical Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 463-481, April.
    18. Marcelo Werneck Barbosa, 2022. "A Critical Appraisal of Review Studies in Circular Economy: a Tertiary Study," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 473-505, June.
    19. Eduardo Terán-Yépez & David Jiménez-Castillo & Manuel Sánchez-Pérez, 2021. "International opportunity recognition: A comprehensive bibliometric review," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 18-52, March.
    20. Cotugno, Matteo & Manta, Francesco & Perdichizzi, Salvatore & Stefanelli, Valeria, 2024. "Ready for a digital Euro? Insights from a research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:326:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04540-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.