IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v190y2024ics1366554524002825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A model for agribusiness supply chain risk management using fuzzy logic. Case study: Grain route from Ukraine to Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Medvediev, Ievgen
  • Muzylyov, Dmitriy
  • Montewka, Jakub

Abstract

In order to establish new logistics routes, it is necessary to address several technical and organizational issues, among others. One of the most important criteria for evaluating the performance of a supply chain is the delivery time, proactive consideration of potential hazards and associated uncertainties that may occur along the route. However, the existing solutions are often passive and reactive, based on statistics, thus not leaving much room for proactive risk mitigation measures. Therefore, there is a need for a foreseeing modern approach to account for the impact of anticipated hazards on delivery time. The aim of this study is to develop a model for determining delivery time considering expected risk factors (RF), based on mathematical tools of fuzzy logic and actual background knowledge elicited from the literature and experts. The paper identifies primary technical and operational hazards that occur during loading and transport and converts them into risk factors. The risk factors are then quantified and fed into a fuzzy model developed with the Matlab Fuzzy Logic Toolbox and assembled in the Simulink environment. The application of the model is demonstrated in three case studies reflecting three potential grain supply chains (SC) from Ukraine to Poland: classical transport by rail grain hoppers (SC1); transport by containers on railway platforms (SC2); transport by bulk grain trucks (SC3). The resulting travel time for the analysed SCs is between 49 and 71 h for SC1, between 45 and 62 h for SC2 and between 42 and 62 h for SC3. In addition, the outliers of the travel time values beyond the 1.5 quantiles were defined according to the uncertainty band. The results of the fuzzy model were compared with the results of the deterministic approach in the concurrent validation and a good agreement was found. This proves the appropriateness of the fuzzy model calculations and the possibility of using alternative SCs in grain delivery. The main benefit of the proposed model is a new universal tool based on a holistic and active approach to risk assessment using fuzzy logic.

Suggested Citation

  • Medvediev, Ievgen & Muzylyov, Dmitriy & Montewka, Jakub, 2024. "A model for agribusiness supply chain risk management using fuzzy logic. Case study: Grain route from Ukraine to Poland," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:190:y:2024:i:c:s1366554524002825
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524002825
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103691?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Divya Choudhary & Ajay Kumar & Baofeng Huo, 2023. "Examination of sustainability risk in freight shipping based on the theory of planned behavior with temporal analysis," Post-Print hal-04325731, HAL.
    2. Nadezda JANKELOVA & Dusan MASAR & Stefania MORICOVA, 2017. "Risk factors in the agriculture sector," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(6), pages 247-258.
    3. Pappas, Ilias O. & Woodside, Arch G., 2021. "Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Peyman Zandi & Mohammad Rahmani & Mojtaba Khanian & Amir Mosavi, 2020. "Agricultural Risk Management Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, October.
    5. Nishat Alam Choudhary & Shalabh Singh & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar, 2023. "Risk assessment in supply chains: a state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 565-607, March.
    6. Jingwen Li & Ke Jing & Myroslav Khimich & Lixin Shen, 2023. "Optimization of Green Containerized Grain Supply Chain Transportation Problem in Ukraine Considering Disruption Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Umair Waqas & Azmawani Abd Rahman & Normaz Wana Ismail & Norazlyn Kamal Basha & Sonia Umair, 2023. "Influence of supply chain risk management and its mediating role on supply chain performance: perspectives from an agri-fresh produce," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1399-1427, May.
    8. Choudhary, Divya & Kumar, Ajay & Huo, Baofeng, 2023. "Examination of sustainability risk in freight shipping based on the theory of planned behavior with temporal analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Burhan Turksen, I. & Willson, Ian A., 1995. "A fuzzy set model for market share and preference prediction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 39-52, April.
    10. Zemin Zheng & Lei Liu & Yang Li & Ni Zhao, 2023. "High-dimensional statistical inference via DATE," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 65-79, January.
    11. Aqlan, Faisal & Lam, Sarah S., 2015. "A fuzzy-based integrated framework for supply chain risk assessment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 54-63.
    12. Resende, Carlos Henrique Lopes & Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2023. "Decision-making models for formulating and evaluating supplier development programs: A state-of-the-art review and research paths," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Xiaojun Luo & Xiangyang Zhang & Jiawen Bao & Ling Chang & Weixin Xi, 2023. "Statistical Modeling of Shadows in SAR Imagery," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Bruns, Stephan & Herwartz, Helmut & Ioannidis, John P.A. & Islam, Chris-Gabriel & Raters, Fabian H. C., 2023. "Statistical reporting errors in economics," MetaArXiv mbx62, Center for Open Science.
    15. Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Chengcheng & Ouyang, Jing & Xu, Gongjun, 2023. "Statistical inference for noisy incomplete binary matrix," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118350, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Riqing Liao & Wei Liu & Yuandao Yuan, 2023. "Resilience Improvement and Risk Management of Multimodal Transport Logistics in the Post–COVID-19 Era: The Case of TIR-Based Sea–Road Multimodal Transport Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Ur Rehman, Obaid & Ali, Yousaf, 2021. "Optimality study of China’s crude oil imports through China Pakistan economic corridor using fuzzy TOPSIS and Cost-Benefit analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. Newall, Philip W.S. & Walasek, Lukasz & Hassanniakalager, Arman & Russell, Alex M.T. & Ludvig, Elliot A. & Browne, Matthew, 2023. "Statistical risk warnings in gambling," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 219-239, April.
    19. Georgii Prokudin & Oleksiy Chupaylenko & Viktoriia Lebid & Olena Denys & Tetiana Khobotnia & Alina Nazarova, 2022. "Logistics of freight transportation and customs service in international transportation," Chapters of Monographs, in: Logistics systems: technological and economic aspects of efficiency, chapter 2, pages 38–74, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER.
    20. Wan, Chengpeng & Yan, Xinping & Zhang, Di & Qu, Zhuohua & Yang, Zaili, 2019. "An advanced fuzzy Bayesian-based FMEA approach for assessing maritime supply chain risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 222-240.
    21. Fan, Di & Lin, Yongjia & Fu, Xiaoqing (Maggie) & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Shi, Xuanyi, 2023. "Supply chain disruption recovery in the evolving crisis—Evidence from the early COVID-19 outbreak in China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    22. Segismundo S. Izquierdo & Luis R. Izquierdo, 2018. "Mamdani Fuzzy Systems for Modelling and Simulation: A Critical Assessment," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 21(3), pages 1-2.
    23. McDougall, Natalie & Wagner, Beverly & MacBryde, Jill, 2022. "Competitive benefits & incentivisation at internal, supply chain & societal level circular operations in UK agri-food SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1149-1162.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moktadir, Md. Abdul & Ren, Jingzheng, 2024. "Towards green logistics: An innovative decision support model for zero-emission transportation modes development," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Wang, Dongxue & Fan, Ruguo & Yang, Peiwen & Du, Kang & Xu, Xiaoxia & Chen, Rongkai, 2024. "Research on floating real-time pricing strategy for microgrid operator in local energy market considering shared energy storage leasing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    3. Nishat Alam Choudhary & Shalabh Singh & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar, 2023. "Risk assessment in supply chains: a state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 565-607, March.
    4. Hao, Jun & Li, Jianping & Wu, Dengsheng & Sun, Xiaolei, 2020. "Portfolio optimisation of material purchase considering supply risk – A multi-objective programming model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    5. Govindan, Kannan & Demartini, Melissa & Formentini, Marco & Taticchi, Paolo & Tonelli, Flavio, 2024. "Unravelling and mapping the theoretical foundations of sustainable supply chains: A literature review and research agenda," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    6. Abroon Qazi & Mecit Can Emre Simsekler & Steven Formaneck, 2023. "Supply chain risk network value at risk assessment using Bayesian belief networks and Monte Carlo simulation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 241-272, March.
    7. Zhang, Lu & Cui, Li & Chen, Lujie & Dai, Jing & Jin, Ziyi & Wu, Hao, 2023. "A hybrid approach to explore the critical criteria of online supply chain finance to improve supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Jiang, Meizhi & Lu, Jing, 2020. "The analysis of maritime piracy occurred in Southeast Asia by using Bayesian network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    9. Zanon, Lucas Gabriel & Munhoz Arantes, Rafael Ferro & Calache, Lucas Daniel Del Rosso & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2020. "A decision making model based on fuzzy inference to predict the impact of SCOR® indicators on customer perceived value," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    10. Xiaoyu Bai & Shengxu Xiong & Zhe Zhou & Xin Liu, 2024. "How to Improve an Enterprise’s Innovation Capability from the Perspective of High- and Low-Level Enterprises Using Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Xue, Biao & Lin, Yan & Ren, Fangxiao & Li, Runfo, 2024. "Business environment ecosystem and manufacturing upgrading: A configurational approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1225-1237.
    12. Uflaz, Esma & Sezer, Sukru Ilke & Tunçel, Ahmet Lutfi & Aydin, Muhammet & Akyuz, Emre & Arslan, Ozcan, 2024. "Quantifying potential cyber-attack risks in maritime transportation under Dempster–Shafer theory FMECA and rule-based Bayesian network modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    13. Wang, Ye & Jiang, Zongzheng & Li, Xiao & Chen, Yang & Cui, Xiao & Wang, Shipeng, 2023. "Research on antecedent configurations of enterprise digital transformation and enterprise performance from the perspective of dynamic capability," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    14. Brewis, Claire & Dibb, Sally & Meadows, Maureen, 2023. "Leveraging big data for strategic marketing: A dynamic capabilities model for incumbent firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    15. Fernando Castelló-Sirvent & Marta Peris-Ortiz & Malar Llopis-Amorós & Pablo Pinazo-Dallenbach, 2024. "How does the COVID-19 economic crisis impact resilience? A configurational analysis of the spinoffs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1823-1848, September.
    16. Borozan, Dj, 2022. "Detecting a structure in the European energy transition policy instrument mix: What mix successfully drives the energy transition?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    17. S. S. Ganji & A. N. Ahangar & Samaneh Jamshidi Bandari, 2022. "Evaluation of vehicular emissions reduction strategies using a novel hybrid method integrating BWM, Q methodology and ER approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11576-11614, October.
    18. Nguyen, Son & Chen, Peggy Shu-Ling & Du, Yuquan & Shi, Wenming, 2019. "A quantitative risk analysis model with integrated deliberative Delphi platform for container shipping operational risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 203-227.
    19. Yan Yang & Qiang Zhou, 2023. "Modeling and Simulation of Crude Oil Sea–River Transshipment System in China’s Yangtze River Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Zhou, Yusheng & Li, Xue & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "Holistic risk assessment of container shipping service based on Bayesian Network Modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:190:y:2024:i:c:s1366554524002825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.