IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v186y2024ics1366554524001339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated model for road freight transport firm selection in third-party logistics using T-spherical Fuzzy sets

Author

Listed:
  • Faruk Görçün, Ömer.
  • Chatterjee, Prasenjit.
  • Stević, Željko.
  • Küçükönder, Hande.

Abstract

The efficient selection of road freight transport (RFT) firms plays a critical role in constructing well-operating logistics systems for large-scale third-party logistics (3PL) providers. However, the decision-making process for such selection is often complex and uncertain due to various influential criteria and dynamic industry nature. To address this challenge, a novel decision-making model that integrates Delphi, CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Combined compromise ranking solution (CoCoSo) methods based on T-Spherical Fuzzy sets has been proposed in this paper. The model integrates expert opinions with an extensive literature review to identify the influential criteria and their corresponding weights. Subsequently, it employs a comprehensive evaluation approach to rank the RFT firms based on their performance. The model accommodates uncertainties and subjectivity by utilizing T-Spherical Fuzzy Numbers, offering robustness and transparency in decision-making. A case study involving 15 evaluation criteria and 12 RFT firms were selected to demonstrate the applicability and aptness of the proposed model. Flexibility and Integrability to different transport modes emerged as the two most essential criteria, whereas RFT firm A2 emerged as the best alternative with the highest performance score of 3.0861, followed by RFT firm A7 with a score value of 3.0499.

Suggested Citation

  • Faruk Görçün, Ömer. & Chatterjee, Prasenjit. & Stević, Željko. & Küçükönder, Hande., 2024. "An integrated model for road freight transport firm selection in third-party logistics using T-spherical Fuzzy sets," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s1366554524001339
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524001339
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103542?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yayi Yuan & Zeshui Xu & Yixin Zhang, 2022. "The DEMATEL–COPRAS hybrid method under probabilistic linguistic environment and its application in Third Party Logistics provider selection," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 137-156, March.
    2. Nguyen-Nhu-Y Ho & Phuong Mai Nguyen & Thi-Minh-Ngoc Luu & Thi-Thuy-Anh Tran, 2022. "Selecting Partners in Strategic Alliances: An Application of the SBM DEA Model in the Vietnamese Logistics Industry," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Dadsena, Krishna Kumar & Sarmah, S.P. & Naikan, V.N.A. & Mathiyazhagan, K. & Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez, 2023. "Performance measurement of road freight transportation: A case of trucking industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 125-140.
    4. Gohari, Adel & Ahmad, Anuar Bin & Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard & Gohari, Ali & Hasan, Razi & Sholagberu, Abdulkadir Taofeeq, 2022. "Significance of intermodal freight modal choice criteria: MCDM-based decision support models and SP-based modal shift policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 46-60.
    5. Haolun Wang, 2022. "Sustainable Circular Supplier Selection in the Power Battery Industry Using a Linguistic T-Spherical Fuzzy MAGDM Model Based on the Improved ARAS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Chia-Nan Wang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Chen-Ming Lu, 2021. "A Compromised Decision-Making Approach to Third-Party Logistics Selection in Sustainable Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-27, April.
    7. Edvardas Liachovičius & Viktor Skrickij & Askoldas Podviezko, 2020. "MCDM Evaluation of Asset-Based Road Freight Transport Companies Using Key Drivers That Influence the Enterprise Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Ibrahim M. Hezam & Naga Rama Devi Vedala & Bathina Rajesh Kumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Fausto Cavallaro, 2023. "Assessment of Biofuel Industry Sustainability Factors Based on the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Symmetry Point of Criterion and Rank-Sum-Based MAIRCA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Yang, Chenchen & Bian, Junsong & Guo, Xiaolong & Jiang, Wenwen, 2024. "Logistics outsourcing strategy with online freight platforms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Berna Bulgurcu, 2018. "An extent analysis of 3PL provider selection criteria: A case on Turkey cement sector," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1469183-146, January.
    11. Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan & Radi Mohd. Radi & Syed Mubashir Ali & Esam H. Zahran & Amro Hayder Al Sahtout & Saad Aldin Esam, 2022. "An analysis of third party logistic selection criteria in oil and gas sector: an integrated SWOT-AHP approach," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 43(1), pages 20-47.
    12. Govindan, Kannan, 2023. "How digitalization transforms the traditional circular economy to a smart circular economy for achieving SDGs and net zero," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    13. Tsung-Yu Chou & Gin-Shuh Liang, 2001. "Application of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for shipping company performance evaluation," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 375-392, October.
    14. Adile Yesim Yayla & Asil Oztekin & Alev Taskin Gumus & Angappa Gunasekaran, 2015. "A hybrid data analytic methodology for 3PL transportation provider evaluation using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(20), pages 6097-6113, October.
    15. Morteza Yazdani & Pascale Zaraté & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems," Post-Print hal-02879091, HAL.
    16. Pal Singh, Satender & Adhikari, Arnab & Majumdar, Adrija & Bisi, Arnab, 2022. "Does service quality influence operational and financial performance of third party logistics service providers? A mixed multi criteria decision making -text mining-based investigation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Jagannath Roy & Dragan Pamučar & Samarjit Kar, 2020. "Evaluation and selection of third party logistics provider under sustainability perspectives: an interval valued fuzzy-rough approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 669-714, October.
    18. Amir Karbassi Yazdi & Thomas Hanne & Juan Carlos Osorio Gómez & Jorge Luis García Alcaraz, 2018. "Finding the Best Third-Party Logistics in the Automobile Industry: A Hybrid Approach," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-19, November.
    19. Sheng-Li Si & Xiao-Yue You & Hu-Chen Liu & Ping Zhang, 2018. "DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-33, January.
    20. Bang-Ning Hwang & Yung-Chi Shen, 2015. "Decision Making for Third Party Logistics Supplier Selection in Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry: A Nonadditive Fuzzy Integral Approach," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-12, February.
    21. Nikolina Vojinović & Siniša Sremac & Dragan Zlatanović & Borna Abramović, 2021. "A Novel Integrated Fuzzy-Rough MCDM Model for Evaluation of Companies for Transport of Dangerous Goods," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-16, December.
    22. Shouzhen Zeng & Harish Garg & Muhammad Munir & Tahir Mahmood & Azmat Hussain, 2019. "A Multi-Attribute Decision Making Process with Immediate Probabilistic Interactive Averaging Aggregation Operators of T-Spherical Fuzzy Sets and Its Application in the Selection of Solar Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-26, November.
    23. Peter Dzakah FANAM & Leigh ACKERLY, 2019. "Evaluating ocean carrier selection criteria: perspectives of Tasmanian shippers," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, December.
    24. Xu, Yuqiu & Wang, Jia & Cao, Kaiying, 2024. "Dynamic joint strategy of channel encroachment and logistics choice considering trade-in service and strategic consumers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    25. Sanjeev Yadav & Dixit Garg & Sunil Luthra, 2020. "Selection of third-party logistics services for internet of things-based agriculture supply chain management," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(2), pages 204-230.
    26. SteadieSeifi, M. & Dellaert, N.P. & Nuijten, W. & Van Woensel, T. & Raoufi, R., 2014. "Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 1-15.
    27. Shouzhen Zeng & Muhammad Munir & Tahir Mahmood & Muhammad Naeem, 2020. "Some T-Spherical Fuzzy Einstein Interactive Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Selection of Photovoltaic Cells," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-16, June.
    28. Barad, M. & Even Sapir, D., 2003. "Flexibility in logistic systems--modeling and performance evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 155-170, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Third-Party Logistics Services Providers (3PLSP) Selection for Supply Chain Strategic Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Chia-Nan Wang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thanh-Tuan Dang, 2023. "Sustainable Evaluation of Major Third-Party Logistics Providers: A Framework of an MCDM-Based Entropy Objective Weighting Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Nebiyu Kedir & Phuong H. D. Nguyen & Citlaly Pérez & Pedro Ponce & Aminah Robinson Fayek, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review on Fuzzy Hybrid Methods in Photovoltaic Solar Energy: Opportunities, Challenges, and Guidance for Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-38, April.
    4. Aytekin, Ahmet & Korucuk, Selçuk & Görçün, Ömer Faruk, 2024. "Determining the factors affecting transportation demand management and selecting the best strategy: A case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 150-166.
    5. Miguel Ortíz-Barrios & Natalia Jaramillo-Rueda & Muhammet Gul & Melih Yucesan & Genett Jiménez-Delgado & Juan-José Alfaro-Saíz, 2023. "A Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Approach for Assessing the Emergency Department Performance during the COVID-19 Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-39, March.
    6. Wei Yang & Yongfeng Pang, 2022. "T-Spherical Fuzzy Bonferroni Mean Operators and Their Application in Multiple Attribute Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-33, March.
    7. Elzbieta Broniewicz & Karolina Ogrodnik, 2021. "A Comparative Evaluation of Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods for Sustainable Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Mohammed, Ahmed & Yazdani, Morteza & Govindan, Kannan & Chatterjee, Prasenjit & Hubbard, Nicolas, 2023. "Would your company’s resilience be internally viable after COVID-19 pandemic disruption?: A new PADRIC-based diagnostic methodology," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. Morteza Yazdani & Dragan Pamucar & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Ali Ebadi Torkayesh, 2022. "“A multi-tier sustainable food supplier selection model under uncertainty”," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 116-145, June.
    10. Priom Mahmud & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Abdullahil Azeem & Priyabrata Chowdhury, 2021. "Evaluating Supply Chain Collaboration Barriers in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, July.
    11. Qian Dai & Jiaqi Yang & Dong Li, 2018. "Modeling a Three-Mode Hybrid Port-Hinterland Freight Intermodal Distribution Network with Environmental Consideration: The Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    12. Ben-Ammar, Oussama & Bettayeb, Belgacem & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Optimization of multi-period supply planning under stochastic lead times and a dynamic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 106-117.
    13. Babagolzadeh, Mahla & Zhang, Yahua & Abbasi, Babak & Shrestha, Anup & Zhang, Anming, 2022. "Promoting Australian regional airports with subsidy schemes: Optimised downstream logistics using vehicle routing problem," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 38-51.
    14. Zhang, M. & Pel, A.J., 2016. "Synchromodal hinterland freight transport: Model study for the port of Rotterdam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-10.
    15. SteadieSeifi, M. & Dellaert, N.P. & Nuijten, W. & Van Woensel, T., 2017. "A metaheuristic for the multimodal network flow problem with product quality preservation and empty repositioning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 321-344.
    16. Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 0. "Information systems in seaports: a categorization and overview," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    17. Panagiotis Ypsilantis & Rob Zuidwijk, 2019. "Collaborative Fleet Deployment and Routing for Sustainable Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-26, October.
    18. Mladen Krstić & Giulio Paolo Agnusdei & Snežana Tadić & Pier Paolo Miglietta, 2023. "Prioritization of e-traceability drivers in the agri-food supply chains," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, December.
    19. Alaa Alden Al Mohamed & Sobhi Al Mohamed, 2023. "Application of fuzzy group decision-making selecting green supplier: a case study of the manufacture of natural laurel soap," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Ali Najmi & Taha H. Rashidi & Alireza Abbasi & S. Travis Waller, 2017. "Reviewing the transport domain: an evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 843-865, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s1366554524001339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.