IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v31y1997i4p315-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Curbing the computational difficulty of the logit equilibrium assignment model

Author

Listed:
  • Leurent, Fabien M.

Abstract

In the past, research in traffic assignment modeling has been directed primarily towards improving the deterministic model. Alternative, more behavioral principles were thought to be too demanding computationally. This paper presents two mathematical contributions that enable one to solve a logit assignment model with flow-dependent travel times at a reduced cost. First, a convergence test for Fisk's minimization program is introduced, based on a duality gap principle. Second, a new definition of Dial's STOCH fixedtime logit assignment procedure is given, in which the set of available paths is defined only once and the computations are re-interpreted. A numerical experiment indicates that these tools make the logit assignment model very competitive compared to the procedures conventionally used for solving the deterministic model.

Suggested Citation

  • Leurent, Fabien M., 1997. "Curbing the computational difficulty of the logit equilibrium assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 315-326, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:31:y:1997:i:4:p:315-326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(96)00035-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fisk, Caroline, 1980. "Some developments in equilibrium traffic assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 243-255, September.
    2. Fukushima, Masao, 1984. "On the dual approach to the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 235-245, June.
    3. Warren B. Powell & Yosef Sheffi, 1982. "The Convergence of Equilibrium Algorithms with Predetermined Step Sizes," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 45-55, February.
    4. Mingyuan Chen & Attahiru Sule Alfa, 1991. "Algorithms for solving fisk's stochastic traffic assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 405-412, December.
    5. Leurent, Fabien, 1993. "Cost versus time equilibrium over a network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 205-221, December.
    6. H C W L Williams, 1977. "On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 9(3), pages 285-344, March.
    7. Carlos F. Daganzo & Yosef Sheffi, 1977. "On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 253-274, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Jansuwan, Sarawut & Yang, Chao & Ryu, Seungkyu, 2018. "Transportation network redundancy: Complementary measures and computational methods," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 68-85.
    2. Bekhor, Shlomo & Toledo, Tomer, 2005. "Investigating path-based solution algorithms to the stochastic user equilibrium problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 279-295, March.
    3. Gutjahr, Walter J. & Dzubur, Nada, 2016. "Bi-objective bilevel optimization of distribution center locations considering user equilibria," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-22.
    4. Jansuwan, Sarawut & Chen, Anthony & Xu, Xiangdong, 2021. "Analysis of freight transportation network redundancy: An application to Utah’s bi-modal network for transporting coal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 154-171.
    5. Guido Gentile, 2018. "New Formulations of the Stochastic User Equilibrium with Logit Route Choice as an Extension of the Deterministic Model," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1531-1547, December.
    6. Rambha, Tarun & Boyles, Stephen D. & Unnikrishnan, Avinash & Stone, Peter, 2018. "Marginal cost pricing for system optimal traffic assignment with recourse under supply-side uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 104-121.
    7. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Xu, Guangming & Yang, Chao & Lam, William H.K., 2021. "Enhancing network resilience by adding redundancy to road networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Jia, Jianlin & Chen, Yanyan & Wang, Yang & Li, Tongfei & Li, Yongxing, 2021. "A new global method for identifying urban rail transit key station during COVID-19: A case study of Beijing, China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    9. Tan, Heqing & Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony, 2024. "On endogenously distinguishing inactive paths in stochastic user equilibrium: A convex programming approach with a truncated path choice model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    10. Chen, Anthony & Pravinvongvuth, Surachet & Xu, Xiangdong & Ryu, Seungkyu & Chootinan, Piya, 2012. "Examining the scaling effect and overlapping problem in logit-based stochastic user equilibrium models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1343-1358.
    11. Huang, Hai-Jun & Li, Zhi-Chun, 2007. "A multiclass, multicriteria logit-based traffic equilibrium assignment model under ATIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1464-1477, February.
    12. Maher, Mike, 1998. "Algorithms for logit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 539-549, November.
    13. Pei Tong & Wenjing Du & Yadan Yan & Junsheng Li, 2023. "Quantifying Bus Accessibility and Mobility for Urban Branches: A Reliability Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Songyot Kitthamkesorn & Anthony Chen, 2024. "Stochastic User Equilibrium Model with a Bounded Perceived Travel Time," Papers 2402.18435, arXiv.org.
    15. Watling, David Paul & Rasmussen, Thomas Kjær & Prato, Carlo Giacomo & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2015. "Stochastic user equilibrium with equilibrated choice sets: Part I – Model formulations under alternative distributions and restrictions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 166-181.
    16. Rasmussen, Thomas Kjær & Watling, David Paul & Prato, Carlo Giacomo & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2015. "Stochastic user equilibrium with equilibrated choice sets: Part II – Solving the restricted SUE for the logit family," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 146-165.
    17. Zhu, Jingjing & Xu, Xiangdong & Wang, Zijian, 2023. "Economic evaluation of redundancy design for transportation networks under disruptions: Framework and case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 70-83.
    18. Maher, Michael J. & Zhang, Xiaoyan & Vliet, Dirck Van, 2001. "A bi-level programming approach for trip matrix estimation and traffic control problems with stochastic user equilibrium link flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 23-40, January.
    19. Zhou, Bojian & Li, Xuhong & He, Jie, 2014. "Exploring trust region method for the solution of logit-based stochastic user equilibrium problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 46-57.
    20. Paul Anderson & David Levinson & Pavithra Parthasarathi, 2011. "Accessibility Futures," Working Papers 000088, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    21. Chan, Ho-Yin & Chen, Anthony & Li, Guoyuan & Xu, Xiangdong & Lam, William, 2021. "Evaluating the value of new metro lines using route diversity measures: The case of Hong Kong's Mass Transit Railway system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    22. Jing, Weiwei & Xu, Xiangdong & Pu, Yichao, 2020. "Route redundancy-based approach to identify the critical stations in metro networks: A mean-excess probability measure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guido Gentile, 2018. "New Formulations of the Stochastic User Equilibrium with Logit Route Choice as an Extension of the Deterministic Model," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1531-1547, December.
    2. Du, Muqing & Tan, Heqing & Chen, Anthony, 2021. "A faster path-based algorithm with Barzilai-Borwein step size for solving stochastic traffic equilibrium models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 982-999.
    3. Xie, Chi & Travis Waller, S., 2012. "Stochastic traffic assignment, Lagrangian dual, and unconstrained convex optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1023-1042.
    4. Damberg, Olof & Lundgren, Jan T. & Patriksson, Michael, 1996. "An algorithm for the stochastic user equilibrium problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 115-131, April.
    5. Ahipaşaoğlu, Selin Damla & Meskarian, Rudabeh & Magnanti, Thomas L. & Natarajan, Karthik, 2015. "Beyond normality: A cross moment-stochastic user equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 333-354.
    6. Maher, Mike, 1998. "Algorithms for logit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 539-549, November.
    7. Castillo, Enrique & Menéndez, José María & Sánchez-Cambronero, Santos, 2008. "Predicting traffic flow using Bayesian networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 482-509, June.
    8. Hong, Sung-Pil & Kim, Kyung min & Byeon, Geunyeong & Min, Yun-Hong, 2017. "A method to directly derive taste heterogeneity of travellers’ route choice in public transport from observed routes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 41-52.
    9. Hai Yang & Qiang Meng & Michael G. H. Bell, 2001. "Simultaneous Estimation of the Origin-Destination Matrices and Travel-Cost Coefficient for Congested Networks in a Stochastic User Equilibrium," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 107-123, May.
    10. Lam, W. H. K. & Gao, Z. Y. & Chan, K. S. & Yang, H., 1999. "A stochastic user equilibrium assignment model for congested transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 351-368, June.
    11. Paolo Delle Site, 2017. "On the Equivalence Between SUE and Fixed-Point States of Day-to-Day Assignment Processes with Serially-Correlated Route Choice," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 935-962, September.
    12. Bekhor, Shlomo & Toledo, Tomer, 2005. "Investigating path-based solution algorithms to the stochastic user equilibrium problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 279-295, March.
    13. Honggang Zhang & Zhiyuan Liu & Yicheng Zhang & Weijie Chen & Chenyang Zhang, 2024. "A Distributed Computing Method Integrating Improved Gradient Projection for Solving Stochastic Traffic Equilibrium Problem," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 361-381, June.
    14. Wang, Judith Y.T. & Ehrgott, Matthias, 2013. "Modelling route choice behaviour in a tolled road network with a time surplus maximisation bi-objective user equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 342-360.
    15. Watling, David Paul & Rasmussen, Thomas Kjær & Prato, Carlo Giacomo & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2015. "Stochastic user equilibrium with equilibrated choice sets: Part I – Model formulations under alternative distributions and restrictions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 166-181.
    16. Zhang, Michael & Nie, Yu & Shen, Wei & Lee, Ming S. & Jansuwan, Sarawut & Chootinan, Piya & Pravinvongvuth, Surachet & Chen, Anthony & Recker, Will W., 2008. "Development of A Path Flow Estimator for Inferring Steady-State and Time-Dependent Origin-Destination Trip Matrices," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3nr033sc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    17. Clark, Stephen D. & Watling, David P., 2006. "Applications of sensitivity analysis for probit stochastic network equilibrium," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 894-911, December.
    18. Claudia Castaldi & Paolo Delle Site & Francesco Filippi, 2019. "Stochastic user equilibrium in the presence of state dependence," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(5), pages 535-559, December.
    19. Maher, M. J. & Hughes, P. C., 1997. "A probit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 341-355, August.
    20. Guarda, Pablo & Qian, Sean, 2024. "Statistical inference of travelers’ route choice preferences with system-level data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:31:y:1997:i:4:p:315-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.