IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v190y2024ics0191261524002145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Superiority proof of "incoming layout" for full link flow observability under uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Xie, Congcong
  • Shao, Minhua
  • Sun, Lijun

Abstract

The full link flow observability problem is to identify the minimum set of links to be installed with sensors in a traffic network that allows the unique determination of all link flow volumes. In our previous work (Shao et al., 2016), we proposed a flow conservation system using turning ratios as prior information, and suggested that installing sensors on all exclusive incoming road links in the traffic network (called "incoming layout") can uniquely determine the flow information of all network links. However, the link flow observed by the sensor is inevitably subject to measurement errors, and there is also a risk that some deviation in prior information (i.e., turning ratios) will be propagated while extending flows over the whole network. Considering these two types of uncertainty, the "incoming layout" is not only a feasible solution, but in this study, has been proved to minimize the cumulative uncertainty in the process of inferring all link flows caused by the sensor measurement error and the deviation of prior information. Specifically, the superiority of the "incoming layout" is proved theoretically, including two cases. (i) Considering only the sensor measurement error, the error propagation theory is analytically expressed using the knowledge of linear algebra. The related error propagation matrix is found to be the key to help demonstrate that the cumulative uncertainty of the "incoming layout" is always smaller than that of the "general layout". (ii) Considering the sensor measurement error and the deviation of prior information, vectorization operator is introduced to quantify the effect of the prior information deviation on the accuracy of link flow inference, which is beneficial to prove the superiority of the "incoming layout" in minimizing the cumulative uncertainty of all link flows.

Suggested Citation

  • Xie, Congcong & Shao, Minhua & Sun, Lijun, 2024. "Superiority proof of "incoming layout" for full link flow observability under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:190:y:2024:i:c:s0191261524002145
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2024.103090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261524002145
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2024.103090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:190:y:2024:i:c:s0191261524002145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.