IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v189y2024ics0191261524001048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining time dependency and behavioral game: A Deep Markov Cognitive Hierarchy Model for human-like discretionary lane changing modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Kehua
  • Zhu, Meixin
  • Sun, Lijun
  • Yang, Hai

Abstract

Human drivers take discretionary lane changes when the target lane is perceived to offer better traffic conditions. Improper discretionary lane changes, however, lead to traffic congestion or even crashes. Considering its significant impact on traffic flow efficiency and safety, accurate modeling and prediction of discretionary lane-changing (LC) behavior is an important component in microscopic traffic analysis. Due to the interaction process and driver behavior stochasticity, modeling discretionary lane-changing behavior is a non-trivial task. Existing approaches include rule-based, utility-based, game-based, and data-driven ones, but they fail to balance the trade-off between modeling accuracy and interpretability. To address this gap, we propose a novel model, called Deep Markov Cognitive Hierarchy Model (DMCHM) which combines time dependency and behavioral game interaction for discretionary lane-changing modeling. Specifically, the lane-changing interaction process between the subject vehicle and the following vehicle in the target lane is modeled as a two-player game. We then introduce three dynamic latent variables for interaction aggressiveness, cognitive level, and payoffs based on the Hidden Markov Model. The proposed DMCHM combines time dependency together with cognitive hierarchy behavioral games while preserving model interpretability. Extensive experiments on three real-world driving datasets demonstrate that DMCHM outperforms other game-theoretic baselines and has comparable performance with state-of-the-art deep learning methods in time and location errors. Besides, we employ SHAP values to present the model interpretability. The analysis reveals that the proposed model has good performance in discretionary LC prediction with high interpretability. Finally, we conduct an agent-based simulation to investigate the impact of various driving styles on macroscopic traffic flows. The simulation shows that the existence of massive aggressive drivers can increase traffic capacity because of small gaps during car-following, but inversely decrease discretionary LC rates. A balanced mixing of conservative and aggressive driving styles promotes discretionary LC frequencies since conservative car-following behaviors provide more spaces for LC. The codes can be found at https://github.com/zeonchen/DMCHM.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Kehua & Zhu, Meixin & Sun, Lijun & Yang, Hai, 2024. "Combining time dependency and behavioral game: A Deep Markov Cognitive Hierarchy Model for human-like discretionary lane changing modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:189:y:2024:i:c:s0191261524001048
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2024.102980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261524001048
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2024.102980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bardsley & Judith Mehta & Chris Starmer & Robert Sugden, 2010. "Explaining Focal Points: Cognitive Hierarchy Theory "versus" Team Reasoning," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 120(543), pages 40-79, March.
    2. McKelvey Richard D. & Palfrey Thomas R., 1995. "Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 6-38, July.
    3. Ji Ang & David Levinson, 2020. "A Review of Game Theory Models of Lane Changing," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    4. Gipps, P. G., 1986. "A model for the structure of lane-changing decisions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 403-414, October.
    5. Coifman, Benjamin & Li, Lizhe, 2017. "A critical evaluation of the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) vehicle trajectory dataset," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 362-377.
    6. Gérard Biau & Erwan Scornet, 2016. "A random forest guided tour," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(2), pages 197-227, June.
    7. Zheng, Zuduo, 2014. "Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 16-32.
    8. Gérard Biau & Erwan Scornet, 2016. "Rejoinder on: A random forest guided tour," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(2), pages 264-268, June.
    9. Colin F. Camerer & Teck-Hua Ho & Juin-Kuan Chong, 2004. "A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(3), pages 861-898.
    10. Wang, Bingtong & Li, Zhibin & Wang, Shunchao & Li, Meng & Ji, Ang, 2022. "Modeling bounded rationality in discretionary lane change with the quantal response equilibrium of game theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 145-161.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bardsley, Nicholas & Ule, Aljaž, 2017. "Focal points revisited: Team reasoning, the principle of insufficient reason and cognitive hierarchy theory," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 74-86.
    2. Bosch-Domènech, Antoni & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2013. "On the role of non-equilibrium focal points as coordination devices," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 52-67.
    3. Irenaeus Wolff, 2017. "Lucky Numbers in Simple Games," TWI Research Paper Series 107, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    4. Jiang, Yangsheng & Tan, Li & Xiao, Guosheng & Wu, Yunxia & Yao, Zhihong, 2024. "Platoon-aware cooperative lane-changing strategy for connected automated vehicles in mixed traffic flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 640(C).
    5. Weihan Chen & Gang Ren & Qi Cao & Jianhua Song & Yikun Liu & Changyin Dong, 2023. "A Game-Theory-Based Approach to Modeling Lane-Changing Interactions on Highway On-Ramps: Considering the Bounded Rationality of Drivers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Wang, Zhaohan & Ramezani, Mohsen & Levinson, David, 2024. "How mandatory are ‘Mandatory’ lane changes? An analytical and experimental study on the costs of missing freeway exits," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    7. Wolff, Irenaeus, 2021. "The lottery player’s fallacy: Why labels predict strategic choices," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 16-29.
    8. Li, Gen & Zhao, Le & Tang, Wenyun & Wu, Lan & Ren, Jiaolong, 2023. "Modeling and analysis of mandatory lane-changing behavior considering heterogeneity in means and variances," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 622(C).
    9. Hou, Lei & Elsworth, Derek & Zhang, Fengshou & Wang, Zhiyuan & Zhang, Jianbo, 2023. "Evaluation of proppant injection based on a data-driven approach integrating numerical and ensemble learning models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    10. Vincent P. Crawford & Nagore Iriberri, 2004. "Fatal Attraction: Focality, Naivete, and Sophistication in Experimental Hide-and-Seek Games," Levine's Bibliography 122247000000000345, UCLA Department of Economics.
    11. Ma, Zhikai & Huo, Qian & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Tao, 2023. "Voltage-temperature aware thermal runaway alarming framework for electric vehicles via deep learning with attention mechanism in time-frequency domain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    12. Patrick Krennmair & Timo Schmid, 2022. "Flexible domain prediction using mixed effects random forests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1865-1894, November.
    13. Allain, Marie-Laure & Chambolle, Claire & Rey, Patrick & Teyssier, Sabrina, 2021. "Vertical integration as a source of hold-up: An experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Sylvain Chassang & Christian Zehnder, 2024. "Secure Survey Design in Organizations: Theory and Experiments," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 371-405, November.
    15. Guilhem Lecouteux, 2018. "What does “we” want? Team Reasoning, Game Theory, and Unselfish Behaviours," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 128(3), pages 311-332.
    16. Alcocer, Christian Diego & Jeitschko, Thomas D. & Shupp, Robert, 2020. "Naive and sophisticated mixing: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 157-173.
    17. Choo, Lawrence C.Y & Kaplan, Todd R., 2014. "Explaining Behavior in the "11-20" Game," MPRA Paper 52808, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Kyle Hyndman & Antoine Terracol & Jonathan Vaksmann, 2022. "Beliefs and (in)stability in normal-form games," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1146-1172, September.
    19. Breitmoser, Yves, 2019. "Knowing me, imagining you: Projection and overbidding in auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 423-447.
    20. Benjamin Patrick Evans & Mikhail Prokopenko, 2021. "Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: The Quantal Hierarchy model of decision-making," Papers 2106.15844, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:189:y:2024:i:c:s0191261524001048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.