IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v131y2020icp106-123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trial-and-error operation schemes for bimodal transport systems

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Ren-Yong
  • Szeto, W.Y.
  • Long, Jiancheng

Abstract

We concern the modal choice of commuters in a transport system comprising a highway, which is only used by autos, in parallel to a transit line, which is only used by buses. In the transport system, the in-vehicle congestion of passengers in bus carriages is treated as a negative externality cost of affecting the modal choice of commuters and commuters choose their travel modes according to the perceived travel costs of transport modes. We propose two trial-and-error operation schemes for the transport system without resorting to both the function of in-vehicle congestion costs and the distribution of perceived travel cost errors. In the first operation scheme, the manager (or the government) determines the transit fare charged from (or financial subsidy to) bus users from period to period so as to minimize the system time cost of the transport system. The second operation scheme is established from the viewpoint of a private firm that operates the public transit line. The operator determines the transit fare and bus run frequency from period to period in order to maximize its operating profit. Moreover, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the two operation schemes for optimizing the system time cost and the operating profit by both theoretical analyses and numerical examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Ren-Yong & Szeto, W.Y. & Long, Jiancheng, 2020. "Trial-and-error operation schemes for bimodal transport systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 106-123.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:131:y:2020:i:c:p:106-123
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2019.11.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261518302017
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2019.11.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Fangni & Yang, Hai & Liu, Wei, 2014. "The Downs–Thomson Paradox with responsive transit service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 244-263.
    2. Ian W. H. Parry & Kenneth A. Small, 2009. "Should Urban Transit Subsidies Be Reduced?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(3), pages 700-724, June.
    3. van der Weijde, Adriaan Hendrik & Verhoef, Erik T. & van den Berg, Vincent A.C., 2013. "Competition in multi-modal transport networks: A dynamic approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 31-44.
    4. Huang, Hai-Jun, 2002. "Pricing and logit-based mode choice models of a transit and highway system with elastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(3), pages 562-570, August.
    5. Li, Michael Z. F., 2002. "The role of speed-flow relationship in congestion pricing implementation with an application to Singapore," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 731-754, September.
    6. Wang, Xiaolei & Yang, Hai, 2012. "Bisection-based trial-and-error implementation of marginal cost pricing and tradable credit scheme," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1085-1096.
    7. Kijung Ahn, 2009. "Road Pricing and Bus Service Policies," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 43(1), pages 25-53, January.
    8. Liu, Wei & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2017. "Doubly dynamics for multi-modal networks with park-and-ride and adaptive pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 162-179.
    9. Richard Arnott & An Yan, 2000. "The Two-Mode Problem: Second-Best Pricing and Capacity," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 474, Boston College Department of Economics.
    10. de Palma, André & Lindsey, Robin & Monchambert, Guillaume, 2017. "The economics of crowding in rail transit," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 106-122.
    11. Wen-Xiang Wu & Hai-Jun Huang, 2014. "Equilibrium and Modal Split in a Competitive Highway/Transit System Under Different Road-use Pricing Strategies," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 48(1), pages 153-169, January.
    12. Eric Pels & Erik T Verhoef, 2007. "Infrastructure Pricing and Competition between Modes in Urban Transport," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(9), pages 2119-2138, September.
    13. Huang, Hai-Jun, 2000. "Fares and tolls in a competitive system with transit and highway: the case with two groups of commuters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 267-284, December.
    14. David, Quentin & Foucart, Renaud, 2014. "Modal choice and optimal congestion," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 12-20.
    15. Mark Wardman & Gerard Whelan, 2011. "Twenty Years of Rail Crowding Valuation Studies: Evidence and Lessons from British Experience," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 379-398.
    16. Kraus, Marvin, 2003. "A new look at the two-mode problem," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 511-530, November.
    17. Yang, Hai & Meng, Qiang & Lee, Der-Horng, 2004. "Trial-and-error implementation of marginal-cost pricing on networks in the absence of demand functions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 477-493, July.
    18. Huang, Hai-Jun & Tian, Qiong & Yang, Hai & Gao, Zi-You, 2007. "Modal split and commuting pattern on a bottleneck-constrained highway," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 578-590, September.
    19. Giulio Cantarella & Pietro Velonà & David Watling, 2015. "Day-to-day Dynamics & Equilibrium Stability in A Two-Mode Transport System with Responsive bus Operator Strategies," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 485-506, September.
    20. Han, Deren & Yang, Hai, 2009. "Congestion pricing in the absence of demand functions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 159-171, January.
    21. Haywood, Luke & Koning, Martin, 2015. "The distribution of crowding costs in public transport: New evidence from Paris," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 182-201.
    22. Gonzales, Eric J. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2012. "Morning commute with competing modes and distributed demand: User equilibrium, system optimum, and pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1519-1534.
    23. Zhou, Bojian & Bliemer, Michiel & Yang, Hai & He, Jie, 2015. "A trial-and-error congestion pricing scheme for networks with elastic demand and link capacity constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 77-92.
    24. Gonzales, Eric J., 2015. "Coordinated pricing for cars and transit in cities with hypercongestion," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 64-81.
    25. Li, Zheng & Hensher, David A., 2011. "Crowding and public transport: A review of willingness to pay evidence and its relevance in project appraisal," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 880-887, November.
    26. Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Wei & Qu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Trial-and-error train fare design scheme for addressing boarding/alighting congestion at CBD stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 318-335.
    27. Guo, Ren-Yong & Szeto, W.Y., 2018. "Day-to-day modal choice with a Pareto improvement or zero-sum revenue scheme," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryszard K. Miler & Marcin J. Kisielewski & Anna Brzozowska & Antonina Kalinichenko, 2020. "Efficiency of Telematics Systems in Management of Operational Activities in Road Transport Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Lie Han, 2022. "Proportional-Switch Adjustment Process with Elastic Demand and Congestion Toll in the Absence of Demand Functions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 709-735, December.
    3. Xu, Su Xiu & Guo, Ren-Yong & Zhai, Yue & Feng, Jianghong & Ning, Yu, 2024. "Toward a positive compensation policy for rail transport via mechanism design: The case of China Railway Express," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 322-342.
    4. Ren, Hualing & Song, Yingjie & Long, Jiancheng & Si, Bingfeng, 2021. "A new transit assignment model based on line and node strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 121-142.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Ren-Yong & Szeto, W.Y., 2018. "Day-to-day modal choice with a Pareto improvement or zero-sum revenue scheme," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-25.
    2. Li, Zhi-Chun & Zhang, Liping, 2020. "The two-mode problem with bottleneck queuing and transit crowding: How should congestion be priced using tolls and fares?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 46-76.
    3. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    4. Li, Zhi-Chun & Huang, Hai-Jun & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 311-342.
    5. Wang, Wei (Walker) & Wang, David Z.W. & Zhang, Fangni & Sun, Huijun & Zhang, Wenyi & Wu, Jianjun, 2017. "Overcoming the Downs-Thomson Paradox by transit subsidy policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 126-147.
    6. Liu, Peng & Liu, Jielun & Ong, Ghim Ping & Tian, Qiong, 2020. "Flow pattern and optimal capacity in a bi-modal traffic corridor with heterogeneous users," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Zhang, Junlin & Yang, Hai & Lindsey, Robin & Li, Xinwei, 2020. "Modeling and managing congested transit service with heterogeneous users under monopoly," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 249-266.
    8. Vincent van den Berg & Erik T. Verhoef, 2011. "Congesting Pricing in a Road and Rail Network with Heterogeneous Values of Time and Schedule Delay," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-059/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 24 May 2012.
    9. Chen, Xinyuan & Zhang, Wei & Guo, Xiaomeng & Liu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Shuaian, 2021. "An improved learning-and-optimization train fare design method for addressing commuting congestion at CBD stations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    10. Hörcher, Daniel & De Borger, Bruno & Graham, Daniel J., 2023. "Subsidised transport services in a fiscal federation: Why local governments may be against decentralised service provision," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    11. Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Wei & Qu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Trial-and-error train fare design scheme for addressing boarding/alighting congestion at CBD stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 318-335.
    12. Basso, Leonardo J. & Feres, Fernando & Silva, Hugo E., 2019. "The efficiency of bus rapid transit (BRT) systems: A dynamic congestion approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 47-71.
    13. Tian, Li-Jun & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2015. "Modeling the modal split and trip scheduling with commuters’ uncertainty expectation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 815-822.
    14. Ihab Kaddoura & Benjamin Kickhöfer & Andreas Neumann & Alejandro Tirachini, 2015. "Agent-based optimisation of public transport supply and pricing: impacts of activity scheduling decisions and simulation randomness," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 1039-1061, November.
    15. Xinyuan Chen & Yiran Wang & Yuan Zhang, 2021. "A Trial-and-Error Toll Design Method for Traffic Congestion Mitigation on Large River-Crossing Channels in a Megacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Kraus, Marvin, 2012. "Road pricing with optimal mass transit," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 81-86.
    17. Liu, Wei & Szeto, Wai Yuen, 2020. "Learning and managing stochastic network traffic dynamics with an aggregate traffic representation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 19-46.
    18. Wang, Jing & Zhang, Xiaoning & Wang, Hua & Zhang, Michael, 2019. "Optimal parking supply in bi-modal transportation network considering transit scale economies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 207-229.
    19. André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Guillaume Monchambert, 2017. "The Economics of Crowding in Public Transport," Post-Print hal-01203310, HAL.
    20. Lie Han, 2022. "Proportional-Switch Adjustment Process with Elastic Demand and Congestion Toll in the Absence of Demand Functions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 709-735, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:131:y:2020:i:c:p:106-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.