IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v123y2019icp362-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interactive online machine learning approach for activity-travel survey

Author

Listed:
  • Seo, Toru
  • Kusakabe, Takahiko
  • Gotoh, Hiroto
  • Asakura, Yasuo

Abstract

This article proposes a framework for an interactive activity-travel survey method, implementable on mobile devices such as smartphones. The proposed method was developed to reduce the burden (i.e., frequency of questions) on respondents in long-term behavioral surveys, without relying on external data sources. The method employs an online travel context estimation model and an online machine learning method as interactive processes. The estimation model is used for automatically estimating travel contexts during surveys, while the online machine learning method is used for dynamically updating the estimation model, based on answers from respondents. The proposed method was examined by simulations using data obtained from a past probe person survey. The results suggest that the frequency of inputs by respondents in surveys can be significantly reduced, while maintaining high accuracy of the obtained data. For example, the method successfully estimated certain types of trips (e.g., commuting) and the behaviors of certain respondents (e.g., those whose activity-travel pattern is recurrent) because of the learning process and reduced survey burden on them. Meanwhile, although the method could not always precisely estimate some other types of trips, it eventually obtained accurate results because of the interaction process. Therefore, the proposed method could be useful to reduce the burden on respondents in long-term surveys, while maintaining high data quality and capturing traveler heterogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Seo, Toru & Kusakabe, Takahiko & Gotoh, Hiroto & Asakura, Yasuo, 2019. "Interactive online machine learning approach for activity-travel survey," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 362-373.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:123:y:2019:i:c:p:362-373
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.11.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261517310469
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2017.11.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tao Feng & Harry J.P. Timmermans, 2016. "Comparison of advanced imputation algorithms for detection of transportation mode and activity episode using GPS data," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 180-194, March.
    2. Siripirote, Treerapot & Sumalee, Agachai & Ho, H.W. & Lam, William H.K., 2015. "Statistical approach for activity-based model calibration based on plate scanning and traffic counts data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 280-300.
    3. Arentze, Theo A. & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2009. "A need-based model of multi-day, multi-person activity generation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 251-265, February.
    4. Han, Gain & Sohn, Keemin, 2016. "Activity imputation for trip-chains elicited from smart-card data using a continuous hidden Markov model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 121-135.
    5. K. W. Axhausen & M. Löchl & R. Schlich & T. Buhl & P. Widmer, 2007. "Fatigue in long-duration travel diaries," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 143-160, March.
    6. Kitamura, Ryuichi & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Fujii, Satoshi, 2003. "The effectiveness of panels in detecting changes in discrete travel behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 191-206, February.
    7. Li Shen & Peter R. Stopher, 2014. "Review of GPS Travel Survey and GPS Data-Processing Methods," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 316-334, May.
    8. Kitamura, Ryuichi, 1990. "Panel Analysis in Transportation Planning: An Overview," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt86v0f7zh, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hong, Shuyao & Zhao, Fang & Livshits, Vladimir & Gershenfeld, Shari & Santos, Jorge & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2021. "Insights on data quality from a large-scale application of smartphone-based travel survey technology in the Phoenix metropolitan area, Arizona, USA," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 413-429.
    2. Peter Horbachov & Oleksandr Makarichev & Stanislav Svichynskyi & Ihor Ivanov, 2022. "Framework for designing sample travel surveys for transport demand modelling in cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 115-136, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Yáñez & Patricio Mansilla & Juan de Ortúzar, 2010. "The Santiago Panel: measuring the effects of implementing Transantiago," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 125-149, January.
    2. Ahmad Termida, Nursitihazlin & Susilo, Yusak O. & Franklin, Joel P., 2016. "Observing dynamic behavioural responses due to the extension of a tram line by using panel survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 78-95.
    3. Grigolon, Anna B. & Borgers, Aloys W.J. & Kemperman, Astrid D.A.M. & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2014. "Vacation length choice: A dynamic mixed multinomial logit model," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 158-167.
    4. Hong, Ye & Stüdeli, Emanuel & Raubal, Martin, 2023. "Evaluating geospatial context information for travel mode detection," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    5. Cynthia Chen & Jason Chen, 2009. "What is responsible for the response lag of a significant change in discretionary time use: the built environment, family and social obligations, temporal constraints, or a psychological delay factor?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 27-46, January.
    6. Danalet, Antonin & Tinguely, Loïc & Lapparent, Matthieu de & Bierlaire, Michel, 2016. "Location choice with longitudinal WiFi data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 1-17.
    7. Allahviranloo, Mahdieh & Axhausen, Kay, 2018. "An optimization model to measure utility of joint and solo activities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 172-187.
    8. La Paix Puello, Lissy & Olde-Kalter, Marie-José & Geurs, Karst T., 2017. "Measurement of non-random attrition effects on mobility rates using trip diaries data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 51-64.
    9. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Baker, Douglas & Washington, Simon & Turrell, Gavin, 2013. "Residential dissonance and mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-28.
    10. Chorus, Caspar & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Daniel, Aemiro Melkamu & Sandorf, Erlend Dancke & Sobhani, Anae & Szép, Teodóra, 2021. "Obfuscation maximization-based decision-making: Theory, methodology and first empirical evidence," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 28-44.
    11. Kitamura, Ryuichi & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Fujii, Satoshi, 2003. "The effectiveness of panels in detecting changes in discrete travel behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 191-206, February.
    12. Yaxuan Zhang & Chunjiang Li & Ying Song & Yanwei Chai & Yingling Fan, 2024. "Personalizing the dichotomy of fixed and flexible activities in everyday life: deriving prism anchors from GPS-enabled survey data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1063-1088, June.
    13. Allahviranloo, Mahdieh & Recker, Will, 2013. "Daily activity pattern recognition by using support vector machines with multiple classes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 16-43.
    14. Benjamin Motte-Baumvol & Julie Fen-Chong & Olivier Bonin, 2023. "Immobility in a weekly mobility routine: studying the links between mobile and immobile days for employees and retirees," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1723-1742, October.
    15. Fabian Märki & David Charypar & Kay Axhausen, 2014. "Agent-based model for continuous activity planning with an open planning horizon," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 905-922, July.
    16. Theo A. Arentze & Benedict G. C. Dellaert & Caspar G. Chorus, 2015. "Incorporating Mental Representations in Discrete Choice Models of Travel Behavior: Modeling Approach and Empirical Application," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 577-590, August.
    17. Liu, Jianmiao & Li, Junyi & Chen, Yong & Lian, Song & Zeng, Jiaqi & Geng, Maosi & Zheng, Sijing & Dong, Yinan & He, Yan & Huang, Pei & Zhao, Zhijian & Yan, Xiaoyu & Hu, Qinru & Wang, Lei & Yang, Di & , 2023. "Multi-scale urban passenger transportation CO2 emission calculation platform for smart mobility management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    18. Marki, Fabian & Charypar, David & Axhausen, Kay, 2014. "Location choice for a continuous simulation of long periods under changing conditions," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18.
    19. Roy, Avipsa & Fuller, Daniel & Nelson, Trisalyn & Kedron, Peter, 2022. "Assessing the role of geographic context in transportation mode detection from GPS data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    20. Adam, Arnaud & Finance, Olivier & Thomas, Isabelle, 2021. "Monitoring trucks to reveal Belgian geographical structures and dynamics: From GPS traces to spatial interactions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:123:y:2019:i:c:p:362-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.