IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v108y2018icp217-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real-time multi-depot vehicle type rescheduling problem

Author

Listed:
  • Guedes, Pablo C.
  • Borenstein, Denis

Abstract

The multiple-depot vehicle type rescheduling problem (MDVTRSP) is a dynamic extension of the classic multiple-depot vehicle scheduling problem (MDVSP), where a heterogeneous fleet is considered. The MDVTRSP consists of finding a new schedule given that a severe disruption occurred in previously scheduled trips very quickly, simultaneously minimizing the transportation costs and the deviations from the original plan. Although several mathematical formulations and solution methods have been developed for the robust MDVTRSP, the real time MDVTRSP is still unexplored. In this paper, we introduce a formulation of the problem and develop a heuristic solution method, employing time-space network, truncated column generation, and preprocessing procedures. The solution method has been implemented in several algorithm variants, combining different developed preprocessing methods. Computational experiments on randomly generated instances were performed to evaluate the performance of the developed algorithms. The best solutions concerning efficiency and efficacy were obtained by the variants considering state space reductions to accelerate the convergence process of the column generation. Solutions were obtained very quickly (in less than 150 seconds for large instances, considering up to 2500 trips, eight depots, and one breakdown. The developed heuristics also presented a good behavior for several simultaneous disruptions, solving the problem with a little increase (less than 8.5%, on average) in the required CPU time. A case study using data from a real-life small instance in Brazil also demonstrated the efficiency and efficacy of the approach when compared with manual planning strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Guedes, Pablo C. & Borenstein, Denis, 2018. "Real-time multi-depot vehicle type rescheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 217-234.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:108:y:2018:i:c:p:217-234
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.12.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019126151730797X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2017.12.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry McCollum & Edmund Burke, 2014. "The practice and theory of automated timetabling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 218(1), pages 1-2, July.
    2. Hassold, Stephan & Ceder, Avishai (Avi), 2014. "Public transport vehicle scheduling featuring multiple vehicle types," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 129-143.
    3. François Vanderbeck, 2005. "Implementing Mixed Integer Column Generation," Springer Books, in: Guy Desaulniers & Jacques Desrosiers & Marius M. Solomon (ed.), Column Generation, chapter 0, pages 331-358, Springer.
    4. Ingmar Steinzen & Vitali Gintner & Leena Suhl & Natalia Kliewer, 2010. "A Time-Space Network Approach for the Integrated Vehicle- and Crew-Scheduling Problem with Multiple Depots," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 367-382, August.
    5. Uçar, Ezgi & İlker Birbil, Ş. & Muter, İbrahim, 2017. "Managing disruptions in the multi-depot vehicle scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 249-269.
    6. Tomoshi Otsuki & Kazuyuki Aihara, 2016. "New variable depth local search for multiple depot vehicle scheduling problems," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 567-585, August.
    7. Kliewer, Natalia & Mellouli, Taieb & Suhl, Leena, 2006. "A time-space network based exact optimization model for multi-depot bus scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1616-1627, December.
    8. Celso C. Ribeiro & François Soumis, 1994. "A Column Generation Approach to the Multiple-Depot Vehicle Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 41-52, February.
    9. Dennis Huisman & Richard Freling & Albert P. M. Wagelmans, 2004. "A Robust Solution Approach to the Dynamic Vehicle Scheduling Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 447-458, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kulkarni, Sarang & Krishnamoorthy, Mohan & Ranade, Abhiram & Ernst, Andreas T. & Patil, Rahul, 2018. "A new formulation and a column generation-based heuristic for the multiple depot vehicle scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 457-487.
    2. Rinaldi, Marco & Picarelli, Erika & D'Ariano, Andrea & Viti, Francesco, 2020. "Mixed-fleet single-terminal bus scheduling problem: Modelling, solution scheme and potential applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Xuemei Zhou & Guohui Wei & Yunbo Zhang & Qianlin Wang & Huanwu Guo, 2023. "Optimizing Multi-Vehicle Demand-Responsive Bus Dispatching: A Real-Time Reservation-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Shejun Deng & Yingying Yuan & Yong Wang & Haizhong Wang & Charles Koll, 2020. "Collaborative multicenter logistics delivery network optimization with resource sharing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-31, November.
    5. Han, Xue & Zhao, Peixin & Kong, Dexin, 2023. "Two-stage optimization of airport ferry service delay considering flight uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1103-1116.
    6. Kazemi, Ahmad & Ernst, Andreas T. & Krishnamoorthy, Mohan & Le Bodic, Pierre, 2021. "Locomotive fuel management with inline refueling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 1077-1096.
    7. Wang, Zheng & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Vehicle routing problem with drones," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 350-364.
    8. Kuo, Yong-Hong & Leung, Janny M.Y. & Yan, Yimo, 2023. "Public transport for smart cities: Recent innovations and future challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1001-1026.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kulkarni, Sarang & Krishnamoorthy, Mohan & Ranade, Abhiram & Ernst, Andreas T. & Patil, Rahul, 2018. "A new formulation and a column generation-based heuristic for the multiple depot vehicle scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 457-487.
    2. Ibarra-Rojas, O.J. & Delgado, F. & Giesen, R. & Muñoz, J.C., 2015. "Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems: A literature review," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 38-75.
    3. Perumal, Shyam S.G. & Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper, 2022. "Electric bus planning & scheduling: A review of related problems and methodologies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 395-413.
    4. Uçar, Ezgi & İlker Birbil, Ş. & Muter, İbrahim, 2017. "Managing disruptions in the multi-depot vehicle scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 249-269.
    5. Shen, Yindong & Xu, Jia & Li, Jingpeng, 2016. "A probabilistic model for vehicle scheduling based on stochastic trip times," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 19-31.
    6. Jing-Quan Li, 2014. "Transit Bus Scheduling with Limited Energy," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 521-539, November.
    7. Niu, Huimin & Zhou, Xuesong & Tian, Xiaopeng, 2018. "Coordinating assignment and routing decisions in transit vehicle schedules: A variable-splitting Lagrangian decomposition approach for solution symmetry breaking," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 70-101.
    8. Bastian Amberg & Boris Amberg & Natalia Kliewer, 2019. "Robust Efficiency in Urban Public Transportation: Minimizing Delay Propagation in Cost-Efficient Bus and Driver Schedules," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 89-112, February.
    9. Attila Tóth & Miklós Krész, 2013. "An efficient solution approach for real-world driver scheduling problems in urban bus transportation," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 21(1), pages 75-94, June.
    10. Markó Horváth & Tamás Kis, 2019. "Computing strong lower and upper bounds for the integrated multiple-depot vehicle and crew scheduling problem with branch-and-price," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(1), pages 39-67, March.
    11. Marco E. Lübbecke & Jacques Desrosiers, 2005. "Selected Topics in Column Generation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 1007-1023, December.
    12. Benchimol, Pascal & Desaulniers, Guy & Desrosiers, Jacques, 2012. "Stabilized dynamic constraint aggregation for solving set partitioning problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 360-371.
    13. Ingmar Steinzen & Vitali Gintner & Leena Suhl & Natalia Kliewer, 2010. "A Time-Space Network Approach for the Integrated Vehicle- and Crew-Scheduling Problem with Multiple Depots," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 367-382, August.
    14. Perumal, S.S.G. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Huisman, D. & Lusby, R.M. & Larsen, J. & Riis, M., 2020. "Solution Approaches for Vehicle and Crew Scheduling with Electric Buses," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI-2020-02, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    15. Balázs Dávid & Miklós Krész, 2017. "The dynamic vehicle rescheduling problem," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 25(4), pages 809-830, December.
    16. Pan Shang & Yu Yao & Liya Yang & Lingyun Meng & Pengli Mo, 2021. "Integrated Model for Timetabling and Circulation Planning on an Urban Rail Transit Line: a Coupled Network-Based Flow Formulation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 331-364, June.
    17. Kazemi, Ahmad & Ernst, Andreas T. & Krishnamoorthy, Mohan & Le Bodic, Pierre, 2021. "Locomotive fuel management with inline refueling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 1077-1096.
    18. Jonathan D. Adler & Pitu B. Mirchandani, 2017. "The Vehicle Scheduling Problem for Fleets with Alternative-Fuel Vehicles," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 441-456, May.
    19. Rinaldi, Marco & Picarelli, Erika & D'Ariano, Andrea & Viti, Francesco, 2020. "Mixed-fleet single-terminal bus scheduling problem: Modelling, solution scheme and potential applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Ciancio, Claudio & Laganà, Demetrio & Musmanno, Roberto & Santoro, Francesco, 2018. "An integrated algorithm for shift scheduling problems for local public transport companies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 139-153.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:108:y:2018:i:c:p:217-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.