IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v46y2012i8p1386-1403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Activity planning processes in the Agent-based Dynamic Activity Planning and Travel Scheduling (ADAPTS) model

Author

Listed:
  • Auld, Joshua
  • Mohammadian, Abolfazl(Kouros)

Abstract

This paper describes the representation of the activity planning process utilized in a new activity-based microsimulation model called the ADAPTS (Agent-based Dynamic Activity Planning and Travel Scheduling) model, which dynamically simulates activity and travel planning and scheduling. The model utilizes a dynamic activity planning framework within the larger overall microsimulation system, which is a computational process model that attempts to replicate the decisions which comprise time-dependent activity scheduling. The model presents a step forward in which the usual concepts of activity generation and activity scheduling are significantly enhanced by adding an additional component referred to as activity planning in which the various attributes which describe the activity are determined. The model framework, therefore, separates activity planning from activity generation and treats all three components, generation, planning and scheduling, as separate discrete but dynamic events within the overall microsimulation. The development of the planning order model, which determines when and in what order each activity planning decision is made is the specific focus of this paper. The models comprising the planning order framework are developed using recent survey data from a GPS-based prompted recall survey. The model development, estimation, validation, and its use within the overall ADAPTS system are discussed. A significant finding of the study is the verification of the apparent transferability of the activity planning order model.

Suggested Citation

  • Auld, Joshua & Mohammadian, Abolfazl(Kouros), 2012. "Activity planning processes in the Agent-based Dynamic Activity Planning and Travel Scheduling (ADAPTS) model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1386-1403.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:46:y:2012:i:8:p:1386-1403
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856412000924
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsu-Tan Fu & Lung-An Li & Yih-Ming Lin & Kamhon Kan, 2000. "A limited information estimator for the multivariate ordinal probit model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(14), pages 1841-1851.
    2. Li, Yonghai & Schafer, Daniel W., 2008. "Likelihood analysis of the multivariate ordinal probit regression model for repeated ordinal responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 3474-3492, March.
    3. Sangho Choo & Patricia Mokhtarian, 2008. "How do people respond to congestion mitigation policies? A multivariate probit model of the individual consideration of three travel-related strategy bundles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 145-163, March.
    4. Lee, Ming-Sheng, 2001. "Experiments With A Computerized Self-Administrative Activity Survey," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt55h7r7x0, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Zhou, Jianyu (Jack) & Golledge, Reginald, 2007. "Real-time tracking of activity scheduling/schedule execution within a unified data collection framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 444-463, June.
    6. Reginald G. Golledge & Mei‐Po Kwan & Tommy Gärling, 1994. "Computational Process Modeling Of Household Travel Decisions Using A Geographical Information System," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 99-117, April.
    7. Tomás Ruiz & Harry Timmermans, 2006. "Changing the timing of activities in resolving Scheduling Conflicts," Transportation, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 429-445, September.
    8. Auld, Joshua & Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros) & Doherty, Sean T., 2009. "Modeling activity conflict resolution strategies using scheduling process data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 386-400, May.
    9. Ming Lee & Michael McNally, 2006. "An empirical investigation on the dynamic processes of activity scheduling and trip chaining," Transportation, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 553-565, November.
    10. Luis Miranda-Moreno & Martin Lee-Gosselin, 2008. "A week in the life of baby boomers: how do they see the spatial–temporal organization of their activities and travel?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 629-653, August.
    11. Mohammadian, Abolfazl & Doherty, Sean T., 2006. "Modeling activity scheduling time horizon: Duration of time between planning and execution of pre-planned activities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 475-490, July.
    12. Golledge, Reginald G. & Kwan, Mei-Po & Garling, Tommy, 1994. "Computational-Process Modelling of Household Travel Decisions Using a Geographical Information System," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4kk8w93s, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiahua Tang & Du Zhang & Xibin Sun & Haiou Qin, 2022. "Improving Temporal Event Scheduling through STEP Perpetual Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Sheila Ferrer & Tomás Ruiz, 2017. "Comparison on travel scheduling between driving and walking trips by habitual car users," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 27-48, January.
    3. Gurumurthy, Krishna Murthy & Kockelman, Kara M., 2022. "Dynamic ride-sharing impacts of greater trip demand and aggregation at stops in shared autonomous vehicle systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 114-125.
    4. Allahviranloo, Mahdieh & Aissaoui, Leila, 2019. "A comparison of time-use behavior in metropolitan areas using pattern recognition techniques," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 271-287.
    5. Ozonder, Gozde & Miller, Eric J., 2021. "Longitudinal investigation of skeletal activity episode timing decisions – A copula approach," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    6. Thuy Linh Hoang & Muhammad Adnan & Anh Tuan Vu & Nguyen Hoang-Tung & Bruno Kochan & Tom Bellemans, 2022. "Modeling and Structuring of Activity Scheduling Choices with Consideration of Intrazonal Tours: A Case Study of Motorcycle-Based Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Leila Dianat & Khandker Nurul Habib & Eric J. Miller, 2020. "Investigating the influence of assigning a higher priority to scheduling work and school activities in the activity-based models on the simulated travel/activity patterns," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2109-2132, October.
    8. Mahmoud Javanmardi & Mehran Fasihozaman Langerudi & Ramin Shabanpour & Abolfazl Mohammadian, 2016. "An optimization approach to resolve activity scheduling conflicts in ADAPTS activity-based model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(6), pages 1023-1039, November.
    9. Emiliano Brancaccio & Mauro Gallegati & Raffaele Giammetti, 2022. "Neoclassical influences in agent‐based literature: A systematic review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 350-385, April.
    10. Vo, Khoa D. & Lam, William H.K. & Chen, Anthony & Shao, Hu, 2020. "A household optimum utility approach for modeling joint activity-travel choices in congested road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 93-125.
    11. Manoj, M. & Verma, Ashish, 2015. "Activity–travel behaviour of non-workers from Bangalore City in India," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 400-424.
    12. Yasmin, Farhana & Morency, Catherine & Roorda, Matthew J., 2015. "Assessment of spatial transferability of an activity-based model, TASHA," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 200-213.
    13. Sarah Salem & Khandker M. Nurul Habib, 2019. "Use of repeated cross-sectional travel surveys for developing meta models of activity-travel scheduling processes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 395-423, April.
    14. Hasnine, Md Sami & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2018. "What about the dynamics in daily travel mode choices? A dynamic discrete choice approach for tour-based mode choice modelling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 70-80.
    15. Ali Najmi & Taha H. Rashidi & James Vaughan & Eric J. Miller, 2020. "Calibration of large-scale transport planning models: a structured approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1867-1905, August.
    16. Yoon, Seo Youn & Ravulaparthy, Srinath K. & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2014. "Dynamic diurnal social taxonomy of urban environments using data from a geocoded time use activity-travel diary and point-based business establishment inventory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 3-17.
    17. Langerudi, Mehran Fasihozaman & Javanmardi, Mahmoud & Shabanpour, Ramin & Rashidi, Taha Hossein & Mohammadian, Abolfazl, 2017. "Incorporating in-home activities in ADAPTS activity-based framework: A sequential conditional probability approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 48-60.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheila Ferrer & Tomás Ruiz, 2017. "Comparison on travel scheduling between driving and walking trips by habitual car users," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 27-48, January.
    2. Auld, Joshua & Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros) & Doherty, Sean T., 2009. "Modeling activity conflict resolution strategies using scheduling process data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 386-400, May.
    3. Ruiz, Tomás & Timmermans, Harry, 2008. "Changing the duration of activities in resolving scheduling conflicts," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 347-359, February.
    4. Bian, Zheyong & Liu, Xiang & Bai, Yun, 2020. "Mechanism design for on-demand first-mile ridesharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 77-117.
    5. Abdul Rawoof Pinjari & Chandra R. Bhat, 2011. "Activity-based Travel Demand Analysis," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Ruiz, Tomás & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2016. "Scheduling decision styles on leisure and social activities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 304-317.
    7. Fang, Zhixiang & Tu, Wei & Li, Qingquan & Li, Qiuping, 2011. "A multi-objective approach to scheduling joint participation with variable space and time preferences and opportunities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 623-634.
    8. Li Ping Gan & Will Recker, 2013. "Stochastic Preplanned Household Activity Pattern Problem with Uncertain Activity Participation (SHAPP)," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 439-454, August.
    9. Langerudi, Mehran Fasihozaman & Javanmardi, Mahmoud & Shabanpour, Ramin & Rashidi, Taha Hossein & Mohammadian, Abolfazl, 2017. "Incorporating in-home activities in ADAPTS activity-based framework: A sequential conditional probability approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 48-60.
    10. Andrew Clark & Sean Doherty, 2010. "A multi-instrumented approach to observing the activity rescheduling decision process," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 165-181, January.
    11. Khandker Habib, 2011. "A random utility maximization (RUM) based dynamic activity scheduling model: Application in weekend activity scheduling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 123-151, January.
    12. Pougala, Janody & Hillel, Tim & Bierlaire, Michel, 2022. "Capturing trade-offs between daily scheduling choices," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    13. Liu, Xintao & Yan, Wai Yeung & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2015. "Time-geographic relationships between vector fields of activity patterns and transport systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 22-33.
    14. Lee-Gosselin, Martin & Miranda-Moreno, Luis F., 2009. "What is different about urban activities of those with access to ICTs? Some early evidence from Québec, Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 104-114.
    15. Jiahua Tang & Du Zhang & Xibin Sun & Haiou Qin, 2022. "Improving Temporal Event Scheduling through STEP Perpetual Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Xuan Liu & John M. Usher, 2016. "Modeling air passengers’ rescheduling strategies for airport service lines based on an empirical study with the aid of a virtual 3-D computer graphic environment," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 57-84, March.
    17. Watanabe, Hajime & Maruyama, Takuya, 2023. "A Bayesian instrumental variable model for multinomial choice with correlated alternatives," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    18. Duan, Zhengyu & Zhao, Haoran & Li, Zhenming, 2023. "Non-linear effects of built environment and socio-demographics on activity space," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    19. Morrison, Geoffrey M. & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia, 2016. "Does employment growth increase travel time to work?: An empirical analysis using military troop movements," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 180-197.
    20. Chunguang Liu & Xinyu Zuo & Xiaoning Gu & Mengru Shao & Chao Chen, 2023. "Activity Duration under the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis among Different Urbanized Areas Using a Hazard-Based Duration Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-28, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:46:y:2012:i:8:p:1386-1403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.