IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v105y2017icp95-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drivers’ self-perceptions about being an eco-driver according to their concern for the environment, beliefs on eco-driving, and driving behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Nègre, Julien
  • Delhomme, Patricia

Abstract

Technological progress has allowed motorized transportation to make a step toward more sustainable mobility but remains one of the main causes of air pollution in France. One way to help reduce the detrimental impact of motorized road transportation is to lead drivers, particularly car-dependent ones, to adopt eco-driving. However numerous drivers do not abide by highway laws or display driving-anger behaviors, which are in opposition to eco-driving. Unfortunately, few people practice eco-driving and many new adopters often have trouble maintaining this driving style. What is more, most studies on this issue have focused on eco-driving gains, the ability of people to put it into effect, and/or the continuous decline in the number of people who practice eco-driving. They usually do not take into account people’s self-perceptions about their driving style, nor the associated beliefs. The aim of the present self-report study was twofold: identify drivers’ self-perceptions about being an eco-driver, and determine how these self-perceptions about being an eco-driver or not are linked to eco-driving-friendly behaviors, levers favoring eco-driving (concern for the environment), and brakes on eco-driving (driving anger and road violations), according to gender. An online survey was carried out with 300 French drivers (127men) ages 19–83. In our sample, 11.3% of the drivers said they felt they were eco-drivers (G1); 50% said they feel trying to eco-drive (G2); 9.7% said they had never heard of eco-driving and 25% said they knew about eco-driving but didn’t do it (G3, felt they were not eco-driver), and 4% said they felt they had abandoned eco-driving (G4). The differences between the first three groups (G1vs. G2/G3) were in line with their eco-driving self-perceptions: G1 had higher scores on three eco-driving-friendly behavior scale components and on environmental conservation, and lower scores on one factor of the driving-anger scale. Also in line with the groups’ eco-driving self-perceptions, G2’s scores were higher than G3’s scores on one eco-driving friendly behavior component. A gender-by-group interaction was found for G1vs. G3 on one eco-driving friendly behavior component, with a larger increase in the men’s than the women’s scores on eco-driving self-perceptions. Finally, violation scores, once again, were higher for men than for women on the speed and anger subscales. The findings of this study are discussed with respect to improving eco-driving learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Nègre, Julien & Delhomme, Patricia, 2017. "Drivers’ self-perceptions about being an eco-driver according to their concern for the environment, beliefs on eco-driving, and driving behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 95-105.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:105:y:2017:i:c:p:95-105
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856417301143
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Strömberg, Helena & Karlsson, I.C. MariAnne & Rexfelt, Oskar, 2015. "Eco-driving: Drivers’ understanding of the concept and implications for future interventions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 48-54.
    2. Barkenbus, Jack N., 2010. "Eco-driving: An overlooked climate change initiative," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 762-769, February.
    3. Onoda, Takao, 2009. "IEA policies--G8 recommendations and an afterwards," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 3823-3831, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng, Jiankun & Shen, Yang & Wu, ChangCheng & Wang, Chunhai & Yi, Fengyan & Ma, Chunye, 2023. "Research on energy-saving driving control of hydrogen fuel bus based on deep reinforcement learning in freeway ramp weaving area," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    2. Ye, Shi & Chen, Qun & Tang, Yi, 2023. "Anger between bus drivers and passengers or among passengers: Development of a bus passenger anger scale (BPAS) and a bus driver anger scale (BDAS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Pan, Wei & Xue, Yu & He, Hong-Di & Lu, Wei-Zhen, 2018. "Impacts of traffic congestion on fuel rate, dissipation and particle emission in a single lane based on Nasch Model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 154-162.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nurul Hidayah Muslim & Ali Keyvanfar & Arezou Shafaghat & Mu’azu Mohammed Abdullahi & Majid Khorami, 2018. "Green Driver: Travel Behaviors Revisited on Fuel Saving and Less Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Geir H. M. Bjertnæs, 2019. "Efficient taxation of fuel and road use," Discussion Papers 905, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    3. Montag, Josef, 2015. "The simple economics of motor vehicle pollution: A case for fuel tax," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 138-149.
    4. Huang, Yuhan & Ng, Elvin C.Y. & Zhou, John L. & Surawski, Nic C. & Chan, Edward F.C. & Hong, Guang, 2018. "Eco-driving technology for sustainable road transport: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 596-609.
    5. Geir H. M. Bjertnaes, 2019. "Efficient Taxation of Fuel and Road Use," CESifo Working Paper Series 8019, CESifo.
    6. Lin, Rui & Wang, Peggy, 2022. "Intention to perform eco-driving and acceptance of eco-driving system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 444-459.
    7. Ali Keyvanfar & Arezou Shafaghat & Nasiru Zakari Muhammad & M. Salim Ferwati, 2018. "Driving Behaviour and Sustainable Mobility—Policies and Approaches Revisited," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    8. Ahmed, Sumayyah & Sanguinetti, Angela, 2015. "OBDEnergy: Making Metrics Meaningful in Eco-driving Feedback," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0x73t2jw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Pietro Stabile & Federico Ballo & Giorgio Previati & Giampiero Mastinu & Massimiliano Gobbi, 2023. "Eco-Driving Strategy Implementation for Ultra-Efficient Lightweight Electric Vehicles in Realistic Driving Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Nan, Sirui & Tu, Ran & Li, Tiezhu & Sun, Jian & Chen, Haibo, 2022. "From driving behavior to energy consumption: A novel method to predict the energy consumption of electric bus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    11. Yuan, Weichang & Frey, H. Christopher, 2020. "Potential for metro rail energy savings and emissions reduction via eco-driving," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Weam Tunsi & Hisham Alidrisi, 2023. "The Innovation-Based Human Development Index Using PROMETHEE II: The Context of G8 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Echeverría, Lucía & Gimenez-Nadal, J. Ignacio & Molina, José Alberto, 2021. "Carpooling: User profiles and well-being," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3568, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    14. Breno Tostes de Gomes Garcia & Diana Mery Messias Lopes & Ilton Curty Leal Junior & José Carlos Cesar Amorim & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva & Vanessa de Almeida Guimarães, 2019. "Analysis of the Performance of Transporting Soybeans from Mato Grosso for Export: A Case Study of the Tapajós-Teles Pires Waterway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, November.
    15. Xie, Shaobo & Lang, Kun & Qi, Shanwei, 2020. "Aerodynamic-aware coordinated control of following speed and power distribution for hybrid electric trucks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    16. Nikoleta Mikušová & Gabriel Fedorko & Vieroslav Molnár & Martina Hlatká & Rudolf Kampf & Veronika Sirková, 2021. "Possibility of a Solution of the Sustainability of Transport and Mobility with the Application of Discrete Computer Simulation—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Strömberg, Helena & Karlsson, I.C. MariAnne & Rexfelt, Oskar, 2015. "Eco-driving: Drivers’ understanding of the concept and implications for future interventions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 48-54.
    18. Frank Meissner & Armin Haas & Jochen Hinkel & Alexander Bisaro, 2020. "A typology for analysing mitigation and adaptation win-win strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 539-564, June.
    19. Pañeda, Xabiel G. & Garcia, Roberto & Diaz, Gabriel & Tuero, Alejandro G. & Pozueco, Laura & Mitre, Maria & Melendi, David & Pañeda, Alejandro G., 2016. "Formal characterization of an efficient driving evaluation process for companies of the transport sector," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 431-445.
    20. Juliet Namukasa & Sheila Namagembe & Faridah Nakayima, 2020. "Fuel Efficiency Vehicle Adoption and Carbon Emissions in a Country Context," International Journal of Global Sustainability, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:105:y:2017:i:c:p:95-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.