IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v152y2023icp23-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cultural evolutionary model of the interaction between parental beliefs and behaviors, with applications to vaccine hesitancy

Author

Listed:
  • Anderson, Kerri-Ann
  • Creanza, Nicole

Abstract

Health perceptions and health-related behaviors can change at the population level as cultures evolve. In the last decade, despite the proven efficacy of vaccines, the developed world has seen a resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) such as measles, pertussis, and polio. Vaccine hesitancy, which is influenced by historical, political, and socio-cultural forces, is believed to be a primary factor responsible for decreasing vaccine coverage, thereby increasing the risk and occurrence of VPD outbreaks. Behavior change models have been increasingly employed to understand disease dynamics and intervention effectiveness. However, since health behaviors are culturally influenced, it is valuable to examine them within a cultural evolution context. Here, using a mathematical modeling framework, we explore the effects of cultural evolution on vaccine hesitancy and vaccination behavior. With this model, we shed light on facets of cultural evolution (vertical transmission, community influences, homophily, etc.) that promote the spread of vaccine hesitancy, ultimately affecting levels of vaccination coverage and VPD outbreak risk in a population. In addition, we present our model as a generalizable framework for exploring cultural evolution when humans’ beliefs influence, but do not strictly dictate, their behaviors. This model offers a means of exploring how parents’ potentially conflicting beliefs and cultural traits could affect their children’s health and fitness. We show that vaccine confidence and vaccine-conferred benefits can both be driving forces of vaccine coverage. We also demonstrate that an assortative preference among vaccine-hesitant individuals can lead to increased vaccine hesitancy and lower vaccine coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Anderson, Kerri-Ann & Creanza, Nicole, 2023. "A cultural evolutionary model of the interaction between parental beliefs and behaviors, with applications to vaccine hesitancy," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 23-38.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:152:y:2023:i:c:p:23-38
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2023.04.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580923000254
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2023.04.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mao, Liang & Yang, Yan, 2012. "Coupling infectious diseases, human preventive behavior, and networks – A conceptual framework for epidemic modeling," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 167-175.
    2. Chris T Bauch & Samit Bhattacharyya, 2012. "Evolutionary Game Theory and Social Learning Can Determine How Vaccine Scares Unfold," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Flávio Codeço Coelho & Claudia T Codeço, 2009. "Dynamic Modeling of Vaccinating Behavior as a Function of Individual Beliefs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-10, July.
    4. Wang, E. & Clymer, J. & Davis-Hayes, C. & Buttenheim, A., 2014. "Nonmedical exemptions from school immunization requirements: A systematic review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(11), pages 62-84.
    5. Nicola Perra & Duygu Balcan & Bruno Gonçalves & Alessandro Vespignani, 2011. "Towards a Characterization of Behavior-Disease Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Julie Leask, 2011. "Target the fence-sitters," Nature, Nature, vol. 473(7348), pages 443-445, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sobo, Elisa J., 2016. "What is herd immunity, and how does it relate to pediatric vaccination uptake? US parent perspectives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 187-195.
    2. Kabir, K.M. Ariful & Tanimoto, Jun, 2019. "Dynamical behaviors for vaccination can suppress infectious disease – A game theoretical approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 229-239.
    3. Kimberly M. Thompson, 2016. "Evolution and Use of Dynamic Transmission Models for Measles and Rubella Risk and Policy Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(7), pages 1383-1403, July.
    4. Kulsum, Umma & Alam, Muntasir & Kamrujjaman, Md., 2024. "Modeling and investigating the dilemma of early and delayed vaccination driven by the dynamics of imitation and aspiration," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Yanling Zhang & Feng Fu, 2018. "Strategy intervention for the evolution of fairness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Deka, Aniruddha & Bhattacharyya, Samit, 2022. "The effect of human vaccination behaviour on strain competition in an infectious disease: An imitation dynamic approach," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 62-76.
    7. Yunhwan Kim & Ana Vivas Barber & Sunmi Lee, 2020. "Modeling influenza transmission dynamics with media coverage data of the 2009 H1N1 outbreak in Korea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Okita, Kouki & Tatsukawa, Yuichi & Utsumi, Shinobu & Arefin, Md. Rajib & Hossain, Md. Anowar & Tanimoto, Jun, 2023. "Stochastic resonance effect observed in a vaccination game with effectiveness framework obeying the SIR process on a scale-free network," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Rossen, Isabel & Hurlstone, Mark J. & Dunlop, Patrick D. & Lawrence, Carmen, 2019. "Accepters, fence sitters, or rejecters: Moral profiles of vaccination attitudes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 23-27.
    10. Dorso, Claudio O. & Medus, Andrés & Balenzuela, Pablo, 2017. "Vaccination and public trust: A model for the dissemination of vaccination behaviour with external intervention," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 482(C), pages 433-443.
    11. Wang, Xinyu & Jia, Danyang & Gao, Shupeng & Xia, Chengyi & Li, Xuelong & Wang, Zhen, 2020. "Vaccination behavior by coupling the epidemic spreading with the human decision under the game theory," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 380(C).
    12. Böhm, Robert & Betsch, Cornelia & Korn, Lars, 2016. "Selfish-rational non-vaccination: Experimental evidence from an interactive vaccination game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 131(PB), pages 183-195.
    13. Ullah, Mohammad Sharif & Higazy, M. & Kabir, K.M. Ariful, 2022. "Dynamic analysis of mean-field and fractional-order epidemic vaccination strategies by evolutionary game approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    14. Kejriwal, Saransh & Sheth, Sarjan & Silpa, P.S. & Sarkar, Sumit & Guha, Apratim, 2022. "Attaining herd immunity to a new infectious disease through multi-stage policies incentivising voluntary vaccination," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Li, Qiu & Li, MingChu & Lv, Lin & Guo, Cheng & Lu, Kun, 2017. "A new prediction model of infectious diseases with vaccination strategies based on evolutionary game theory," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 51-60.
    16. Carpiano, Richard M. & Fitz, Nicholas S., 2017. "Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 127-136.
    17. Jiménez, Ángel V. & Stubbersfield, Joseph M. & Tehrani, Jamshid J., 2018. "An experimental investigation into the transmission of antivax attitudes using a fictional health controversy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 23-27.
    18. Mendonça, J.P. & Brum, Arthur A. & Lyra, M.L. & Lira, Sérgio A., 2024. "Evolutionary game dynamics and the phase portrait diversity in a pandemic scenario," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    19. Heinlein, Bastian & De Domenico, Manlio, 2023. "Unraveling the role of adapting risk perception during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    20. Katarzyna T. Bolsewicz & Maryke S. Steffens & Bianca Bullivant & Catherine King & Frank Beard, 2021. "“To Protect Myself, My Friends, Family, Workmates and Patients …and to Play My Part”: COVID-19 Vaccination Perceptions among Health and Aged Care Workers in New South Wales, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:152:y:2023:i:c:p:23-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.