IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p8954-d621755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“To Protect Myself, My Friends, Family, Workmates and Patients …and to Play My Part”: COVID-19 Vaccination Perceptions among Health and Aged Care Workers in New South Wales, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna T. Bolsewicz

    (National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Kids Research, Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network, Cnr Hawkesbury Rd & Hainsworth St., Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
    Hunter New England Local Health District, Health Protection, Wallsend Hospital Campus, Wallsend, NSW 2287, Australia)

  • Maryke S. Steffens

    (National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Kids Research, Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network, Cnr Hawkesbury Rd & Hainsworth St., Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia)

  • Bianca Bullivant

    (National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Kids Research, Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network, Cnr Hawkesbury Rd & Hainsworth St., Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia)

  • Catherine King

    (National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Kids Research, Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network, Cnr Hawkesbury Rd & Hainsworth St., Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
    The Children’s Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, The Faculty of Medicine and Health, Cnr Hawkesbury Rd & Hainsworth St., Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia)

  • Frank Beard

    (National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Kids Research, Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network, Cnr Hawkesbury Rd & Hainsworth St., Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
    School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building (A27) Fisher Road, Sidney, NSW 2006, Australia)

Abstract

The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has globally caused widespread disruption, morbidity and mortality. The uptake of COVID-19 vaccination is critical for minimising further impacts of the pandemic. Health and aged care workers (HACWs) play a central role in public confidence in vaccines and are one of the priority groups for COVID-19 vaccination in Australia. Qualitative phone interviews with 19 HACWs aged 21–50 years old from New South Wales, Australia, were conducted, and the data were analysed thematically in order to understand the factors influencing HACWs’ acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination. We found that HACWs reported a continuum of COVID-19 vaccination intentions with 12 enthusiastically accepting and 7 hesitant. Using the Behavioral and Social Drivers of COVID-19 Vaccination (BeSD) Framework, we found that participants’ acceptance of vaccination was primarily driven by their perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination (such as safety, risk and benefits) and by the information sources, people and norms they trusted. Informed by study findings, we propose several communication strategies which may be helpful in addressing HACWs vaccination acceptance. We note however that as the pandemic continues, further studies with HACWs from diverse backgrounds are needed in order to provide accurate data on diverse motivational and practical drivers of evolving perceptions and attitudes towards vaccination.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna T. Bolsewicz & Maryke S. Steffens & Bianca Bullivant & Catherine King & Frank Beard, 2021. "“To Protect Myself, My Friends, Family, Workmates and Patients …and to Play My Part”: COVID-19 Vaccination Perceptions among Health and Aged Care Workers in New South Wales, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:8954-:d:621755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/8954/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/8954/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heidi J. Larson, 2018. "The biggest pandemic risk? Viral misinformation," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7727), pages 309-309, October.
    2. Julie Leask, 2011. "Target the fence-sitters," Nature, Nature, vol. 473(7348), pages 443-445, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daphne Bussink-Voorend & Jeannine L. A. Hautvast & Lisa Vandeberg & Olga Visser & Marlies E. J. L. Hulscher, 2022. "A systematic literature review to clarify the concept of vaccine hesitancy," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(12), pages 1634-1648, December.
    2. Huang, Qian & Gilkey, Melissa B. & Thompson, Peyton & Grabert, Brigid K. & Dailey, Susan Alton & Brewer, Noel T., 2022. "Explaining higher Covid-19 vaccination among some US primary care professionals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aida El-Far Cardo & Thomas Kraus & Andrea Kaifie, 2021. "Factors That Shape People’s Attitudes towards the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany—The Influence of MEDIA, Politics and Personal Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Dongwoo Lim & Fujio Toriumi & Mitsuo Yoshida & Mikihito Tanaka & Kunhao Yang, 2024. "The variant of efforts avoiding strain: successful correction of a scientific discourse related to COVID-19," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Rossen, Isabel & Hurlstone, Mark J. & Dunlop, Patrick D. & Lawrence, Carmen, 2019. "Accepters, fence sitters, or rejecters: Moral profiles of vaccination attitudes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 23-27.
    4. Torben E. Agergaard & Màiri E. Smith & Kristian H. Nielsen, 2020. "Vaccine Assemblages on Three HPV Vaccine-Critical Facebook Pages in Denmark from 2012 to 2019," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 339-352.
    5. Marta R. Jabłońska & Karolina Zajdel & Radosław Zajdel, 2021. "Social and Psychological Consequences of COVID-19 Online Content at a Lockdown Phase—Europe and Asia Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Philipp Lorenz-Spreen & Stephan Lewandowsky & Cass R. Sunstein & Ralph Hertwig, 2020. "How behavioural sciences can promote truth, autonomy and democratic discourse online," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(11), pages 1102-1109, November.
    7. Jiménez, Ángel V. & Stubbersfield, Joseph M. & Tehrani, Jamshid J., 2018. "An experimental investigation into the transmission of antivax attitudes using a fictional health controversy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 23-27.
    8. Gabriel Miao Li & Josh Pasek & Jon A. Krosnick & Tobias H. Stark & Jennifer Agiesta & Gaurav Sood & Trevor Tompson & Wendy Gross, 2022. "Americans’ Attitudes toward the Affordable Care Act: What Role Do Beliefs Play?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 700(1), pages 41-54, March.
    9. Jack P Hughes & Alexandros Efstratiou & Sara R Komer & Lilli A Baxter & Milica Vasiljevic & Ana C Leite, 2022. "The impact of risk perceptions and belief in conspiracy theories on COVID-19 pandemic-related behaviours," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Alberto Barchetti & Emma Neybert & Susan Powell Mantel & Frank R. Kardes, 2022. "The Half-Truth Effect and Its Implications for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Jiayin Pei & Zhi Lu & Xiaoming Yang, 2022. "What drives people to repost social media messages during the COVID‐19 pandemic? Evidence from the Weibo news microblog," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 1609-1626, December.
    12. MacFarlane, Douglas & Hurlstone, Mark J. & Ecker, Ullrich K.H., 2020. "Protecting consumers from fraudulent health claims: A taxonomy of psychological drivers, interventions, barriers, and treatments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    13. Briony Swire-Thompson & David Lazer, 2022. "Reducing Health Misinformation in Science: A Call to Arms," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 700(1), pages 124-135, March.
    14. Loredana Covolo & Miriam Guana & Guglielmo Bonaccorsi & Laura Brunelli & Silvana Castaldi & Antonella De Donno & Alessandra Mereu & Marco Verani & Umberto Gelatti, 2022. "Exploring the Online Health Information-Seeking Behavior in a Sample of Italian Women: The “SEI Donna” Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Fabricia Oliveira Saraiva & Ruth Minamisava & Maria Aparecida da Silva Vieira & Ana Luiza Bierrenbach & Ana Lucia Andrade, 2015. "Vaccination Coverage and Compliance with Three Recommended Schedules of 10-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine during the First Year of Its Introduction in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Rino Falcone & Alessandro Sapienza, 2020. "How COVID-19 Changed the Information Needs of Italian Citizens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Amir Karami & Morgan Lundy & Frank Webb & Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy & Brooke W. McKeever & Robert McKeever, 2021. "Identifying and Analyzing Health-Related Themes in Disinformation Shared by Conservative and Liberal Russian Trolls on Twitter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Chuhan Wu & Fangzhao Wu & Tao Qi & Wei-Qiang Zhang & Xing Xie & Yongfeng Huang, 2022. "Removing AI’s sentiment manipulation of personalized news delivery," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Anderson, Kerri-Ann & Creanza, Nicole, 2023. "A cultural evolutionary model of the interaction between parental beliefs and behaviors, with applications to vaccine hesitancy," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 23-38.
    20. Kristen Pickles & Tessa Copp & Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz & Rachael H. Dodd & Carissa Bonner & Brooke Nickel & Maryke S. Steffens & Holly Seale & Erin Cvejic & Melody Taba & Brian Chau & Kirsten J. McCaff, 2022. "COVID-19 Vaccine Misperceptions in a Community Sample of Adults Aged 18–49 Years in Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:8954-:d:621755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.