IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v122y2018icp88-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the distribution of fitness effects using a generalized Beta-Burr distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Joyce, Paul
  • Abdo, Zaid

Abstract

In Beisel et al. (2007), a likelihood framework, based on extreme value theory (EVT), was developed for determining the distribution of fitness effects for adaptive mutations. In this paper we extend this framework beyond the extreme distributions and develop a likelihood framework for testing whether or not extreme value theory applies. By making two simple adjustments to the Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) we introduce a new simple five parameter probability density function that incorporates nearly every common (continuous) probability model ever used. This means that all of the common models are nested. This has important implications in model selection beyond determining the distribution of fitness effects. However, we demonstrate the use of this distribution utilizing likelihood ratio testing to evaluate alternative distributions to the Gumbel and Weibull domains of attraction of fitness effects. We use a bootstrap strategy, utilizing importance sampling, to determine where in the parameter space will the test be most powerful in detecting deviations from these domains and at what sample size, with focus on small sample sizes (n<20). Our results indicate that the likelihood ratio test is most powerful in detecting deviation from the Gumbel domain when the shape parameters of the model are small while the test is more powerful in detecting deviations from the Weibull domain when these parameters are large. As expected, an increase in sample size improves the power of the test. This improvement is observed to occur quickly with sample size n≥10 in tests related to the Gumbel domain and n≥15 in the case of the Weibull domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Joyce, Paul & Abdo, Zaid, 2018. "Determining the distribution of fitness effects using a generalized Beta-Burr distribution," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 88-96.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:122:y:2018:i:c:p:88-96
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2017.07.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580917300357
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2017.07.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paranaíba, Patrícia F. & Ortega, Edwin M.M. & Cordeiro, Gauss M. & Pescim, Rodrigo R., 2011. "The beta Burr XII distribution with application to lifetime data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 1118-1136, February.
    2. Leemis, Lawrence M. & McQueston, Jacquelyn T., 2008. "Univariate Distribution Relationships," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 62, pages 45-53, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vladimir Hlasny, 2021. "Parametric representation of the top of income distributions: Options, historical evidence, and model selection," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1217-1256, September.
    2. Seyyed Ali Zeytoon Nejad Moosavian, 2022. "The Visual Decoding of the Wheel of Duality in Consumer Theory in Modern Microeconomics," Papers 2209.02839, arXiv.org.
    3. Janette Larney & Gerrit Lodewicus Grobler & James Samuel Allison, 2022. "Introducing Two Parsimonious Standard Power Mixture Models for Bimodal Proportional Data with Application to Loss Given Default," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Songyot Kitthamkesorn & Anthony Chen, 2024. "Stochastic User Equilibrium Model with a Bounded Perceived Travel Time," Papers 2402.18435, arXiv.org.
    5. Eurek, Kelly & Sullivan, Patrick & Gleason, Michael & Hettinger, Dylan & Heimiller, Donna & Lopez, Anthony, 2017. "An improved global wind resource estimate for integrated assessment models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 552-567.
    6. L. Raso & S. V. Weijs & M. Werner, 2018. "Balancing Costs and Benefits in Selecting New Information: Efficient Monitoring Using Deterministic Hydro-economic Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(1), pages 339-357, January.
    7. Renata Rojas Guerra & Fernando A. Peña-Ramírez & Gauss M. Cordeiro, 2023. "The Logistic Burr XII Distribution: Properties and Applications to Income Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Nanami Taketomi & Kazuki Yamamoto & Christophe Chesneau & Takeshi Emura, 2022. "Parametric Distributions for Survival and Reliability Analyses, a Review and Historical Sketch," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Liu, Junfeng & Wang, Yi, 2013. "On Crevecoeur’s bathtub-shaped failure rate model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 645-660.
    10. Hanieh Panahi, 2019. "Estimation for the parameters of the Burr Type XII distribution under doubly censored sample with application to microfluidics data," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(4), pages 510-518, August.
    11. Nadarajah, Saralees & Rocha, Ricardo, 2016. "Newdistns: An R Package for New Families of Distributions," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 69(i10).
    12. Chakraburty Subrata & Alizadeh Morad & Handique Laba & Altun Emrah & Hamedani G. G., 2021. "A new extension of Odd Half-Cauchy Family of Distributions: properties and applications with regression modeling," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 77-100, December.
    13. Daniel A. Griffith, 2022. "Reciprocal Data Transformations and Their Back-Transforms," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Andres, Philipp, 2014. "Maximum likelihood estimates for positive valued dynamic score models; The DySco package," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 34-42.
    15. Victor Korolev, 2020. "Some Properties of Univariate and Multivariate Exponential Power Distributions and Related Topics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, November.
    16. Seyyed Ali Zeytoon Nejad MOOSAVIAN, 2016. "Teaching Economics and Providing Visual “Big Pictures”," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 119-133, March.
    17. Singh, Vijay P., 2018. "Systems of frequency distributions for water and environmental engineering," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 50-74.
    18. Jolynn Pek & R. Philip Chalmers & Bethany E. Kok & Diane Losardo, 2015. "Visualizing Confidence Bands for Semiparametrically Estimated Nonlinear Relations Among Latent Variables," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 40(4), pages 402-423, August.
    19. Seyyed Ali Zeytoon Nejad Moosavian, 2016. "The Visual Decoding of the ¡°Wheel of Duality¡± in Consumer Theory in Modern Microeconomics: An Instructional Tool Usable in Advanced Microeconomics to Turn ¡°Pain¡± into ¡°Joy¡±," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 3(3), pages 288-304, August.
    20. Lucas D. Ribeiro Reis & Gauss M. Cordeiro & Maria do Carmo S. Lima, 2022. "The Stacy-G Class: A New Family of Distributions with Regression Modeling and Applications to Survival Real Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-43, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:122:y:2018:i:c:p:88-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.