IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v105y2015icp39-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relative importance of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect in the lottery model

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan, Chi
  • Chesson, Peter

Abstract

Although it is likely that many coexistence mechanisms contribute to maintenance of species diversity, most approaches to understanding species coexistence proceed as if only one mechanism would be present. In studies of species coexistence in a temporally fluctuating environment, the storage effect, believed to be the most important coexistence mechanism, has been the focus. Although a different coexistence mechanism—relative nonlinearity—is also predicted to arise frequently with environmental variation, its effect has been overshadowed by the storage effect. The relatively nonlinear growth rates on which the mechanism depends arise simply from differences in life history traits. Many kinds of temporal variation can then interact with these nonlinearity differences to create the relative nonlinearity coexistence mechanism. Much is unknown about when this mechanism is important and its total neglect is not justified. Here, we use the lottery model to provide a much needed quantitative assessment of the relative and combined effects of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect. Our analysis takes advantage of recently developed techniques for quantifying coexistence mechanisms when multiple mechanisms operate in concert. We find that relative nonlinearity is able to contribute substantially to species coexistence in the lottery model when two conditions are satisfied: (1) species must differ greatly in their adult death rates, (2) sensitivity of recruitment to environmental variation must be greater for species with larger adult death rates. In addition, relative nonlinearity has a critical role in compensating for a weakened storage effect when there is high correlation between species in their responses to the varying environment. In some circumstances relative nonlinearity is stronger than the storage effect or is even the sole mechanism of coexistence.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan, Chi & Chesson, Peter, 2015. "The relative importance of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect in the lottery model," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 39-52.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:105:y:2015:i:c:p:39-52
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2015.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580915000799
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2015.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jef Huisman & Franz J. Weissing, 1999. "Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos," Nature, Nature, vol. 402(6760), pages 407-410, November.
    2. Chesson, Peter & Kuang, Jessica J., 2010. "The storage effect due to frequency-dependent predation in multispecies plant communities," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 148-164.
    3. Kang, Yun & Chesson, Peter, 2010. "Relative nonlinearity and permanence," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 26-35.
    4. Kuang, Jessica J. & Chesson, Peter, 2010. "Interacting coexistence mechanisms in annual plant communities: Frequency-dependent predation and the storage effect," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 56-70.
    5. Colleen K. Kelly & Michael G. Bowler, 2002. "Coexistence and relative abundance in forest trees," Nature, Nature, vol. 417(6887), pages 437-440, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stump, Simon Maccracken & Chesson, Peter, 2017. "How optimally foraging predators promote prey coexistence in a variable environment," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 40-58.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mathias, Andrea & Chesson, Peter, 2013. "Coexistence and evolutionary dynamics mediated by seasonal environmental variation in annual plant communities," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 56-71.
    2. Holt, Galen & Chesson, Peter, 2014. "Variation in moisture duration as a driver of coexistence by the storage effect in desert annual plants," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 36-50.
    3. Stump, Simon Maccracken & Chesson, Peter, 2015. "Distance-responsive predation is not necessary for the Janzen–Connell hypothesis," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 60-70.
    4. Stump, Simon Maccracken & Chesson, Peter, 2017. "How optimally foraging predators promote prey coexistence in a variable environment," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 40-58.
    5. Zhang, Yu J. & Harte, John, 2015. "Population dynamics and competitive outcome derive from resource allocation statistics: The governing influence of the distinguishability of individuals," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 53-63.
    6. Rashleigh, Brenda & DeAngelis, Donald L., 2007. "Conditions for coexistence of freshwater mussel species via partitioning of fish host resources," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 171-178.
    7. Pavão, D.C. & Elias, R.B. & Silva, L., 2019. "Comparison of discrete and continuum community models: Insights from numerical ecology and Bayesian methods applied to Azorean plant communities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 402(C), pages 93-106.
    8. Sergey Bartsev & Andrey Degermendzhi, 2023. "The Evolutionary Mechanism of Formation of Biosphere Closure," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Marten Scheffer & Remi Vergnon & Egbert H van Nes & Jan G M Cuppen & Edwin T H M Peeters & Remko Leijs & Anders N Nilsson, 2015. "The Evolution of Functionally Redundant Species; Evidence from Beetles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, October.
    10. Anna Y. Alekseeva & Anneloes E. Groenenboom & Eddy J. Smid & Sijmen E. Schoustra, 2021. "Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics in Microbial Communities from Spontaneous Fermented Foods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Chesson, Peter & Kuang, Jessica J., 2010. "The storage effect due to frequency-dependent predation in multispecies plant communities," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 148-164.
    12. Hairong Lin & Chunhua Wang & Fei Yu & Jingru Sun & Sichun Du & Zekun Deng & Quanli Deng, 2023. "A Review of Chaotic Systems Based on Memristive Hopfield Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. López-Ruiz, Ricardo & Fournier-Prunaret, Danièle, 2009. "Periodic and chaotic events in a discrete model of logistic type for the competitive interaction of two species," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 334-347.
    14. Trobia, José & de Souza, Silvio L.T. & dos Santos, Margarete A. & Szezech, José D. & Batista, Antonio M. & Borges, Rafael R. & Pereira, Leandro da S. & Protachevicz, Paulo R. & Caldas, Iberê L. & Iaro, 2022. "On the dynamical behaviour of a glucose-insulin model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Mulderij, Gabi & Van Nes, Egbert H. & Van Donk, Ellen, 2007. "Macrophyte–phytoplankton interactions: The relative importance of allelopathy versus other factors," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 85-92.
    16. Sudakov, Ivan & Vakulenko, Sergey A. & Bruun, John T., 2022. "Stochastic physics of species extinctions in a large population," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).
    17. Malay Banerjee & Nayana Mukherjee & Vitaly Volpert, 2018. "Prey-Predator Model with a Nonlocal Bistable Dynamics of Prey," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-13, March.
    18. Cagle, Sierra E. & Roelke, Daniel L., 2024. "Chaotic mixotroph dynamics arise with nutrient loading: Implications for mixotrophy as a harmful bloom forming mechanism," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    19. Silverman, B. David, 2007. "Modeling the effect of growth rate and survivability trade-offs on species coexistence and spatial topology at a traveling invasive wave-front," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 454-464.
    20. Šajna, Nina & Kušar, Primož, 2014. "Modeling species fitness in competitive environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 31-36.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:105:y:2015:i:c:p:39-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.