IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v48y2024i9s0308596124001319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital economy, technical change and total factor productivity: Empirical evidence from high-tech industry in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Linyan
  • Hu, Chunyu
  • Guo, Chuanyin
  • Wang, Jianguo

Abstract

This study uses the Hicks-Moorsteen index method to examine the impact mechanism of the digital economy on the total factor productivity and its decomposition efficiencies of the high-tech industry in China. The results show that the total factor productivity of the high-tech industry in the research and development phase is significantly and positively influenced by the primary phase of digital economy development. Digital economy development has a positive impact on technical change, according to the specific path analysis, which has an inverted U-shaped nonlinear characteristic. With a U-shaped nonlinear characteristic, it has a significant and persistent negative impact on efficiency changes, where the positive impact of technological spillovers on the digital economy outweighs the negative impact of technological shocks. The threshold effect test shows that the best condition for promoting total factor productivity and its decomposition efficiency in the R&D stage of high-tech industry was achieved when the digital economy composite index was between 2.611 and 2.747.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Linyan & Hu, Chunyu & Guo, Chuanyin & Wang, Jianguo, 2024. "Digital economy, technical change and total factor productivity: Empirical evidence from high-tech industry in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:48:y:2024:i:9:s0308596124001319
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596124001319
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:48:y:2024:i:9:s0308596124001319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.