IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v66y2021ics0160791x21001251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding decentralized civic engagement: Focus on peer-to-peer and blockchain-driven perspectives on e-participation

Author

Listed:
  • Kassen, Maxat

Abstract

Decentralized civic engagement, i.e. engagement which is not initiated and managed by government, has been often used as a popular slogan in various public speeches to highlight the importance of genuine civic interests in governance, yet offering very limited options on how to actually promote such involvement. The advent of the digital era has facilitated the development of a plethora of digital participatory platforms that could presumably help to boost the effective engagement of civic communities in decision making processes in an explicitly decentralized manner and, more so, the demand for such decentralized e-participation services is increasing during the current Covid-19 crisis. However, there is a real shortage of studies that directly focus on the analysis of such autonomous cases and all the more so from real life contexts in their natural settings. In this regard, this paper aims to fill the gap by analyzing the phenomena from an intrinsically peer-to-peer networking perspective, which could be observed today in popular autonomous civic engagement initiatives that have been launched in recent times in the area.

Suggested Citation

  • Kassen, Maxat, 2021. "Understanding decentralized civic engagement: Focus on peer-to-peer and blockchain-driven perspectives on e-participation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21001251
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X21001251
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuang-Ting Tai & Gregory Porumbescu & Jongmin Shon, 2020. "Can e-participation stimulate offline citizen participation: an empirical test with practical implications," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 278-296, February.
    2. Newton Masinde & Liat Khitman & Iakov Dlikman & Kalman Graffi, 2020. "Systematic Evaluation of LibreSocial—A Peer-to-Peer Framework for Online Social Networks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Emre Cinar & Paul Trott & Christopher Simms, 2019. "A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 264-290, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chand Bhatt, Priyanka & Kumar, Vimal & Lu, Tzu-Chuen & Daim, Tugrul, 2021. "Technology convergence assessment: Case of blockchain within the IR 4.0 platform," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Valeria Babayan & Israel Marques II & Michael Mironyuk & Aleksei Turobov, 2021. "Public Trust In Internet Voting Systems: Evidence From Russian Public Opinion," HSE Working papers WP BRP 83/PS/2021, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cricelli, Livio & Mauriello, Roberto & Strazzullo, Serena, 2023. "Preventing open innovation failures: A managerial framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    2. Huiying Zhang & Zijian Zhu, 2024. "Mobile Government Service Promotion Strategies: Exploring Sustainable Development Pathways Based on Provincial Government Practices in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Jarle Trondal & Stefan Gänzle & Benjamin Leruth, 2022. "Differentiation in the European Union in Post‐Brexit and ‐Pandemic Times: Macro‐Level Developments with Meso‐Level Consequences," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(S1), pages 26-37, September.
    4. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen & Aguado-Moralejo, Itziar & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick, 2022. "Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Hosany, A. R. Shaheen & Hosany, Sameer & He, Hongwei, 2022. "Children sustainable behaviour: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 236-257.
    6. Tumanyan Garnik (Туманян Г.В.), 2020. "On The Relationship Between The Protest Movement And The Use Of Co-Management Technologies In The Legislative (Representative) Authorities Of Cities Of Federal Significance [О Взаимосвязи Протестно," State and Municipal Management Scholar Notes, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 3, pages 285-290.
    7. Plotnikof, Mie & Pedersen, Anne Reff, 2019. "Exploring resistance in collaborative forms of governance: Meaning negotiations and counter-narratives in a case from the Danish education sector," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    8. Wayu Eko Yudiatmaja & Roy Valiant Salomo & Eko Prasojo, 2023. "Fostering Innovative Behavior of Millennial Public Employee Through Leadership Styles and Organizational Trust," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    9. Aarthi Raghavan & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Public Health Innovation through Cloud Adoption: A Comparative Analysis of Drivers and Barriers in Japan, South Korea, and Singapore," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, January.
    10. Mette Aadahl & Henrik Vardinghus-Nielsen & Paul Bloch & Thea Suldrup Jørgensen & Charlotta Pisinger & Mette Kirstine Tørslev & Charlotte Demant Klinker & Signe Damsbo Birch & Henrik Bøggild & Ulla Tof, 2023. "Our Healthy Community Conceptual Framework and Intervention Model for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Municipalities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, February.
    11. Jessica Sherrod Hale & Joanna Woronkowicz, 2021. "Artists as public sector intrapreneurs: an experiment," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 653-666, August.
    12. Philip Mark Plotch, 2024. "Innovation, collaboration, and chief innovation officers," Journal of Critical Infrastructure Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(1), pages 13-16, July.
    13. Timo Tremml & Sabine Löbbe & Andreas Kuckertz, 2022. "Board behavior’s impact on entrepreneurial orientation in public enterprises," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(4), pages 1183-1211, December.
    14. Shuguang Wang & Xuefu Sun & Shen Zhong, 2023. "Exploring the Multiple Paths to Improve the Construction Level of Digital Government: Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on the WSR Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    15. John, Laura, 2022. "Rethinking digital governance - How collaborative innovation strategies advance the development of digital innovations in public organisations," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 7(5), pages 1400-1418.
    16. Ian Scott, 2021. "Context and innovation in traditional bureaucracies: A Hong Kong study," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 12-22, February.
    17. Matthew M. Mars & Judith L. Bronstein, 2020. "The population ecology of undesigned systems: an analysis of the Arizona charter school system," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Aarthi Raghavan & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Serik Orazgaliyev, 2021. "COVID-19 and the New Normal of Organizations and Employees: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Domenico, Giandomenico Di & Sit, Jason & Ishizaka, Alessio & Nunan, Daniel, 2021. "Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 329-341.
    20. Wynen, Jan & Boon, Jan & Kleizen, Bjorn & Verhoest, Koen, 2020. "How multiple organizational changes shape managerial support for innovative work behavior : Evidence from the Australian Public Service," Other publications TiSEM 4f721d76-0c44-4d72-a494-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21001251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.