IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v58y2019ics0160791x18301271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why do people use fitness tracking devices in Thailand? An integrated model approach

Author

Listed:
  • Naglis, Michael
  • Bhatiasevi, Veera

Abstract

A three-pronged approach was used in this study consisting of a very comprehensive review of the literature, interview with experts, and a field survey to propose a model of user acceptance of fitness tracking devices in Thailand. The proposed model is an integrated model consisting of the technology acceptance model, flow theory, and innovation diffusion theory. A survey consisting of 452 fitness tracking users was undertaken in the Greater Bangkok region. Examinations of both convergent and discriminant validities were conducted. The results of the structural equation modeling illustrate that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, behavioral intention, perceived enjoyment, result demonstrability, visibility, and trialability posit a statistically positive relationship with fitness tracking device acceptance. Contrary to other technology acceptance studies, perceived control, concentration, and compatibility did not posit a positive relationship with fitness tracking device acceptance. Discussions of the findings and conclusions along with implications and limitations are presented in this study. This study is also one of the first few to investigate the acceptance of fitness tracking devices in the context of a developing country, in this case Thailand.

Suggested Citation

  • Naglis, Michael & Bhatiasevi, Veera, 2019. "Why do people use fitness tracking devices in Thailand? An integrated model approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:58:y:2019:i:c:s0160791x18301271
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X18301271
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amaro, Suzanne & Duarte, Paulo, 2015. "An integrative model of consumers' intentions to purchase travel online," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 64-79.
    2. Marios Koufaris, 2002. "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 205-223, June.
    3. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    4. El-Gohary, Hatem, 2012. "Factors affecting E-Marketing adoption and implementation in tourism firms: An empirical investigation of Egyptian small tourism organisations," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 1256-1269.
    5. Henry Kaiser, 1970. "A second generation little jiffy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(4), pages 401-415, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barta, Sergio & Flavián, Carlos & Gurrea, Raquel, 2021. "Managing consumer experience and online flow: Differences in handheld devices vs PCs," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Engström, Emma & Strimling, Pontus, 2020. "Deep learning diffusion by infusion into preexisting technologies – Implications for users and society at large," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Chenming Peng & Hong Zhao & Sha Zhang, 2021. "Determinants and Cross-National Moderators of Wearable Health Tracker Adoption: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Yong Liu & Meng Wang & Danyu Huang & Qiang Huang & Hua Yang & Zhigang Li, 2019. "The impact of mobility, risk, and cost on the users’ intention to adopt mobile payments," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 319-342, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Misganaw Assegid Ayele & Singh Apar, 2020. "The Diffusion of E-marketing in Tourism Businesses of Ethiopia: An Empirical Investigation of Organisational E-readiness Perspectives," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    3. Bisma Mannan & Abid Haleem, 2017. "Understanding major dimensions and determinants that help in diffusion & adoption of product innovation: using AHP approach," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Cristian Morosan, 2021. "An affective approach to modelling intentions to use technologies for social distancing in hotels," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 549-573, December.
    5. Engin TENGİLİMOGLU & Azize HASSAN, 2020. "Applying Flow Theory to the Online Booking Experience: The Role of Utilitarian and Hedonic Features," Journal of Tourismology, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, June.
    6. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    7. Muhammad Riaz & Sherani, 2021. "Investigation of information sharing via multiple social media platforms: a comparison of Facebook and WeChat adoption," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1751-1773, October.
    8. Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Cheng Ling & Teo, Shen Long & Tan, Kim Hua, 2021. "The role of food apps servitization on repurchase intention: A study of FoodPanda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Carolina Herrando & Julio Jiménez-Martínez & María José Martín-De Hoyos, 2017. "Passion at first sight: how to engage users in social commerce contexts," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 701-720, December.
    10. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & J. Sánchez-Fernández, 2018. "A global approach to the analysis of user behavior in mobile payment systems in the new electronic environment," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(1), pages 25-64, March.
    11. Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Sánchez-Fernández, Juan & Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco, 2014. "The moderating effect of experience in the adoption of mobile payment tools in Virtual Social Networks: The m-Payment Acceptance Model in Virtual Social Networks (MPAM-VSN)," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 151-166.
    12. Qian Wang & Michael Myers & David Sundaram, 2013. "Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(6), pages 409-419, December.
    13. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Francisco Rejón-Guardia & Juán Sánchez-Fernández & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, 2011. "Motivational Factors that influence the Acceptance of Microblogging Social Networks: The µBAM Model," FEG Working Paper Series 06/11, Faculty of Economics and Business (University of Granada).
    15. Jiang, Yi & Wang, Xueqin & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Augmented reality shopping application usage: The influence of attitude, value, and characteristics of innovation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Andrei OGREZEANU, 2015. "Models Of Technology Adoption: An Integrative Approach," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 5, pages 55-67, June.
    17. Fong, Lawrence Hoc Nang & Lam, Long Wai. & Law, Rob, 2017. "How locus of control shapes intention to reuse mobile apps for making hotel reservations: Evidence from chinese consumers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 331-342.
    18. Zhenhui Jiang & Izak Benbasat, 2007. "Research Note---Investigating the Influence of the Functional Mechanisms of Online Product Presentations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 454-470, December.
    19. Kim, Nooree & Park, Yuri & Lee, Daeho, 2019. "Differences in consumer intention to use on-demand automobile-related services in accordance with the degree of face-to-face interactions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 277-286.
    20. Jaiswal, Deepak & Mohan, Ashutosh & Deshmukh, Arun Kumar, 2023. "Cash rich to cashless market: Segmentation and profiling of Fintech-led-Mobile payment users," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:58:y:2019:i:c:s0160791x18301271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.