IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v209y2024ics0040162524005729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer preferences for artificial intelligence-enhanced products: Differences across consumer segments, product types, and countries

Author

Listed:
  • Frank, Björn

Abstract

Products with artificial intelligence (AI) functions perform thinking, decision-making, and social tasks, similar to human assistants. Drawing on this similarity to complement established theories of technology acceptance, this research develops hypotheses about consumers' preferences to buy or avoid AI products and the variation of these preferences across consumers and AI product types, which is particularly novel in the literature. Three studies from China, Japan, and the U.S. find that AI-specific privacy gain (especially for unhealthy consumers and AI product owners) and social connection (especially for lonely and extraverted consumers) have positive effects on intentions to purchase AI products. Moreover, AI-specific privacy concerns (especially for consumers with a high need for cognition and for products designed to resemble a living organism) and AI-specific violence concerns (especially for less open and less lonely consumers and for products designed as objects) negatively influence intentions to purchase AI products. Comparing the results across countries, AI privacy gain has the strongest motivational effect in the U.S., an individualistic country, and AI privacy/violence concerns have the strongest deterrent effect in Japan, a risk-averse country. Furthermore, AI social connection has the weakest effect in China, a collectivist country that may offer more conventional, non-AI social connection opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank, Björn, 2024. "Consumer preferences for artificial intelligence-enhanced products: Differences across consumer segments, product types, and countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:209:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524005729
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005729
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yann Truong & Geoff Simmons & Rod Mccoll & Philip Kitchen, 2008. "Status and Conspicuousness – Are They Related? Strategic Marketing Implications for Luxury Brands," Post-Print hal-04072074, HAL.
    2. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Andrew B. Trigg, 2001. "Veblen, Bourdieu, and Conspicuous Consumption," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 99-115, March.
    4. Ahmad Alaiad & Lina Zhou & Gunes Koru, 2014. "An Exploratory Study of Home Healthcare Robots Adoption Applying the UTAUT Model," International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), IGI Global, vol. 9(4), pages 44-59, October.
    5. Gary S. Becker, 1992. "Habits, Addictions, and Traditions," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 327-345, August.
    6. Thomas Leicht & Anis Chtourou & Kamel Ben Youssef, 2018. "Consumer innovativeness and intentioned autonomous car adoption," Post-Print hal-02511554, HAL.
    7. Lyn Craig & Janeen Baxter, 2016. "Domestic Outsourcing, Housework Shares and Subjective Time Pressure: Gender Differences in the Correlates of Hiring Help," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 271-288, January.
    8. Björn Frank & Gulimire Abulaiti & Takao Enkawa, 2012. "What characterizes Chinese consumer behavior? A cross-industry analysis of the Chinese diaspora in Japan," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 683-700, September.
    9. Kamolsook, Apinya & Badir, Yuosre F. & Frank, Björn, 2019. "Consumers' switching to disruptive technology products: The roles of comparative economic value and technology type," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 328-340.
    10. Sheehan, Ben & Jin, Hyun Seung & Gottlieb, Udo, 2020. "Customer service chatbots: Anthropomorphism and adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 14-24.
    11. Frank, Björn & Enkawa, Takao & Schvaneveldt, Shane J. & Herbas Torrico, Boris, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of innate willingness to pay for innovations: Understanding motivations and consumer preferences of prospective early adopters," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 252-266.
    12. Frank, Björn & Enkawa, Takao & Schvaneveldt, Shane J., 2015. "The role of individualism vs. collectivism in the formation of repurchase intent: A cross-industry comparison of the effects of cultural and personal values," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 261-278.
    13. Rijsdijk, S.A. & Hultink, E.J. & Diamantopoulos, A., 2007. "Product Intelligence: Its Conceptualization, Measurement and Impact on Consumer Satisfaction," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-006-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. Esther de Ruijter & Tanja van der Lippe & Werner Raub, 2003. "Trust Problems in Household Outsourcing," Rationality and Society, , vol. 15(4), pages 473-507, November.
    15. Michael J. Barone & T. J. Bae & Shanshan Qian & Jason d’Mello, 2017. "Power and the appeal of the deal: how consumers value the control provided by Pay What You Want (PWYW) pricing," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 437-447, September.
    16. Tubadji, Annie & Huang, Haoran & Webber, Don J, 2021. "Cultural proximity bias in AI-acceptability: The importance of being human," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. Frank, Björn & Herbas-Torrico, Boris & Schvaneveldt, Shane J., 2021. "The AI-extended consumer: Technology, consumer, country differences in the formation of demand for AI-empowered consumer products," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    18. Pankaj Aggarwal & Ann L. McGill, 2007. "Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 468-479, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank, Björn & Herbas-Torrico, Boris & Schvaneveldt, Shane J., 2021. "The AI-extended consumer: Technology, consumer, country differences in the formation of demand for AI-empowered consumer products," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Tian, Yu & Frank, Björn, 2024. "Optimizing live streaming features to enhance customer immersion and engagement: A comparative study of live streaming genres in China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Alabed, Amani & Javornik, Ana & Gregory-Smith, Diana, 2022. "AI anthropomorphism and its effect on users' self-congruence and self–AI integration: A theoretical framework and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Li, Chia-Ying & Zhang, Jin-Ting, 2023. "Chatbots or me? Consumers’ switching between human agents and conversational agents," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Justina Sidlauskiene & Yannick Joye & Vilte Auruskeviciene, 2023. "AI-based chatbots in conversational commerce and their effects on product and price perceptions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Lucia-Palacios, Laura & Pérez-López, Raúl, 2021. "Effects of Home Voice Assistants' Autonomy on Instrusiveness and Usefulness: Direct, Indirect, and Moderating Effects of Interactivity," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 41-54.
    7. Chen, Qian & Gong, Yeming & Lu, Yaobin & Tang, Jing, 2022. "Classifying and measuring the service quality of AI chatbot in frontline service," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 552-568.
    8. Cong-Minh Dinh & Sungjun (Steven) Park, 2024. "How to increase consumer intention to use Chatbots? An empirical analysis of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on social presence and the moderating effects of fear across generations," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2427-2467, December.
    9. Kamolsook, Apinya & Badir, Yuosre F. & Frank, Björn, 2019. "Consumers' switching to disruptive technology products: The roles of comparative economic value and technology type," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 328-340.
    10. Frank, Björn & Enkawa, Takao & Schvaneveldt, Shane J., 2015. "The role of individualism vs. collectivism in the formation of repurchase intent: A cross-industry comparison of the effects of cultural and personal values," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 261-278.
    11. Gonzalez-Jimenez, Hector & Fastoso, Fernando & Fukukawa, Kyoko, 2019. "How independence and interdependence moderate the self-congruity effect on brand attitude: A study of east and west," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 293-300.
    12. Wang, Ping & Li, Kunyang & Du, Qinglong & Wang, Jianqiong, 2024. "Customer experience in AI-enabled products: Scale development and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Fernandes, Teresa & Oliveira, Elisabete, 2021. "Understanding consumers’ acceptance of automated technologies in service encounters: Drivers of digital voice assistants adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 180-191.
    14. Kang, Weiyao & Shao, Bingjia, 2023. "The impact of voice assistants’ intelligent attributes on consumer well-being: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    15. Martin Abraham & Natascha Nisic & Miriam Trübner & Hanna Walch & Anja Wunder, 2024. "The role of generalized trust and control in the employment of domestic help – An experimental case study for Germany and the UK," Rationality and Society, , vol. 36(2), pages 230-253, May.
    16. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman, 2019. "Relationship journeys in the internet of things: a new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 216-237, March.
    17. Rita Gonçalves, Ana & Costa Pinto, Diego & Gonzalez-Jimenez, Héctor & Dalmoro, Marlon & Mattila, Anna S., 2025. "Me, Myself, and My AI: How artificial intelligence classification failures threaten consumers’ self-expression," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    18. Dhiman, Neeraj & Jamwal, Mohit & Kumar, Ajay, 2023. "Enhancing value in customer journey by considering the (ad)option of artificial intelligence tools," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    19. Rokonuzzaman, Md & Kim, Kyoungmi (Kate) & Dugar, Kranti Kumar & Fox, Jennine, 2022. "What makes an object smart? Conceptualization, development, and validation of a scale to measure the Smartness of a Thing (SoT)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 337-354.
    20. Frank, Björn & Enkawa, Takao & Schvaneveldt, Shane J. & Herbas Torrico, Boris, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of innate willingness to pay for innovations: Understanding motivations and consumer preferences of prospective early adopters," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 252-266.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:209:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524005729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.