IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v200y2024ics0040162523007874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The optimization of a corporate social responsibility management system based on service-orientated architecture under the concept of sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Su, Kun
  • Liu, Chengyun
  • Zhang, Miaomiao

Abstract

Against the background of globalization, the trend of corporate social responsibility is irreversible. In this study, a motivation analysis framework and evaluation index system of corporate social responsibility under dual constraints are established and an index system of corporate social responsibility evaluation is designed. A multiple linear regression analysis is used to build an evaluation index system model of cement enterprises' corporate social responsibility accounting. To further improve the fidelity between this model and the actual situation of cement enterprises, a self-adaptive Service-Oriented Architecture reasoning system, constructed by integrating the reasoning function of Service-Orientated Architecture logic and the learning function of the neural network, improves the evaluation index system model of the social responsibility accounting of enterprises. Through experimental analysis, the error of the corporate social responsibility accounting evaluation index in this study was within 10 %, indicating a good prediction effect. According to this set of standards, enterprises must fulfill their social responsibilities to be helpful in the future development of corporate social responsibility evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Su, Kun & Liu, Chengyun & Zhang, Miaomiao, 2024. "The optimization of a corporate social responsibility management system based on service-orientated architecture under the concept of sustainable development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523007874
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162523007874
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esben Pedersen, 2010. "Modelling CSR: How Managers Understand the Responsibilities of Business Towards Society," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 155-166, January.
    2. Du, Yunzhou & Kim, Phillip H., 2021. "One size does not fit all: Strategy configurations, complex environments, and new venture performance in emerging economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 272-285.
    3. Liu, Chengyun & Su, Kun & Zhang, Miaomiao, 2021. "Water disclosure and financial reporting quality for social changes: Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Won‐Moo Hur & Seung‐Yoon Rhee & Eun Ju Lee & Hyewon Park, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility perceptions and sustainable safety behaviors among frontline employees: The mediating roles of organization‐based self‐esteem and work engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 60-70, January.
    5. Khojastehpour, Morteza & Shams, S.M. Riad, 2020. "Addressing the complexity of stakeholder management in international ecological setting: A CSR approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 302-309.
    6. Abdelkarim Asdiou & Bouchaib Mokhtari, 2019. "The Indicators of the Corporate Social Responsibility: A Search for Efficiency or a Concern for Legitimacy Towards Stakeholders? A Proposed Explanatory Model," International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), IGI Global, vol. 10(1), pages 62-76, January.
    7. Yunhong Hao & Qamar Farooq & Yanni Zhang, 2018. "Unattended social wants and corporate social responsibility of leading firms: Relationship of intrinsic motivation of volunteering in proposed welfare programs and employee attributes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1029-1038, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabien Martinez, 2014. "Corporate strategy and the environment: towards a four-dimensional compatibility model for fostering green management decisions," Post-Print hal-02887618, HAL.
    2. Xue, Biao & Lin, Yan & Ren, Fangxiao & Li, Runfo, 2024. "Business environment ecosystem and manufacturing upgrading: A configurational approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1225-1237.
    3. Zijian Zhang & Yinghao Lin & Xiaoyuan Wang & Xin Zhang, 2024. "Pathways to Resilient and Sustainable Online Education in the New Normal: Interpreting University Teachers’ Willingness to Use Online Teaching Platforms Consistently," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Christina W. Y. Wong & Chee Yew Wong & Sakun Boon-itt & Ailie K. Y. Tang, 2021. "Strategies for Building Environmental Transparency and Accountability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Madeleine Feder & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2019. "Understanding the behavioral gap: Why would managers (not) engage in CSR-related activities?," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 95-126, April.
    6. Liyuan Zheng & Ling Ye & Mengjiao Wang & Yingdi Wang & Haiwei Zhou, 2022. "Does Water Matter? The Impact of Water Vulnerability on Corporate Financial Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Zhou, Chao & Lin, Feng, 2024. "Does global diversification promote or hinder green innovation? Evidence from Chinese multinational corporations," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Anna Kwiotkowska, 2024. "Creating Organizational Resilience through Digital Transformation and Dynamic Capabilities: Findings from fs/QCA Analysis on the Example of Polish CHP Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    9. José María Agudo-Valiente & Concepción Garcés-Ayerbe & Manuel Salvador-Figueras, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility Drivers and Barriers According to Managers’ Perception; Evidence from Spanish Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Beatrice Karitu & Stephen Muathe, 2023. "The New Venture Creation Approach: The Role of Business Incubators in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(5), pages 1431-1441, May.
    11. Javier Martínez‐Falcó & Bartolomé Marco‐Lajara & Patrocinio Zaragoza‐Sáez & Luis A. Millán‐Tudela, 2023. "Analyzing the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Green Innovation Performance in the Spanish wine industry: A structural equation modeling analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 985-1006, October.
    12. Xiaomiao Yin & Lirong Xing & Chunxiao Cui, 2023. "The Impact of Multi-Dimensional Vectors on China’s Agricultural Products Export: Based on fsQCA," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Gordon Liu & Teck-Yong Eng & Wai-Wai Ko, 2013. "Strategic Direction of Corporate Community Involvement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 469-487, July.
    14. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2021. "The Employees’ State of Mind during COVID-19: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Austin Chia & Margaret L. Kern, 2021. "Subjective Wellbeing and the Social Responsibilities of Business: an Exploratory Investigation of Australian Perspectives," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(5), pages 1881-1908, October.
    16. Yves Fassin & Andrea Werner & Annick van Rossem & Silvana Signori & Elisabeth Garriga & Heidi von Weltzien Hoivik & Hans-Jörg Schlierer, 2015. "CSR and Related Terms in SME Owner–Managers' Mental Models in Six European Countries : National Context Matters," Post-Print hal-02313143, HAL.
    17. Hong Huo & Quanxi Li, 2022. "Influencing Factors of the Continuous Use of a Knowledge Payment Platform—Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on Triadic Reciprocal Determinism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Oscar Licandro & Luis Camilo Ortigueira Sánchez & Oscar Huapaya-Huertas, 2023. "Consistency between Definition and Reasons for Applying Corporate Social Responsibility: The Perspective of Social Responsibility Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Jan Dul & Sven Hauff & Ricarda B. Bouncken, 2023. "Necessary condition analysis (NCA): review of research topics and guidelines for good practice," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 683-714, February.
    20. Cristiana Parisi, 2013. "The impact of organisational alignment on the effectiveness of firms’ sustainability strategic performance measurement systems: an empirical analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 71-97, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523007874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.