IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v184y2022ics0040162522004620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subsidy for clean innovation considered technological spillover

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Yong-cong
  • Nie, Pu-yan

Abstract

Under technological spillover, this article considers the effects of subsidy to improve clean innovation. Some interesting conclusions are achieved. First, firms without innovation benefit from technological spillover and subsidy promotes firms' innovation. Second, energy price fluctuation affects innovative firms more than others. Third, carbon taxes impact outputs and profits uncertainly. Finally, more subsidy yields less emission, while the environmental efficiency of subsidy decreases with subsidy intensity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Yong-cong & Nie, Pu-yan, 2022. "Subsidy for clean innovation considered technological spillover," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:184:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522004620
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162522004620
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Philippe Aghion & Leonardo Bursztyn & David Hemous, 2012. "The Environment and Directed Technical Change," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 131-166, February.
    2. Jamali, Mohammad-Bagher & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2022. "A game-theoretic approach for examining government support strategies and licensing contracts in an electricity supply chain with technology spillover: A case study of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    3. Porzio, Giacomo Filippo & Colla, Valentina & Fornai, Barbara & Vannucci, Marco & Larsson, Mikael & Stripple, Håkan, 2016. "Process integration analysis and some economic-environmental implications for an innovative environmentally friendly recovery and pre-treatment of steel scrap," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 656-672.
    4. Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Douglas Hanley & William Kerr, 2016. "Transition to Clean Technology," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(1), pages 52-104.
    5. Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Cal B. Muckley & Parvati Neelakantan, 2021. "Is firm-level clean or dirty innovation valued more?," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1-2), pages 31-61, January.
    6. Alberini, Anna & Bigano, Andrea, 2015. "How effective are energy-efficiency incentive programs? Evidence from Italian homeowners," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(S1), pages 76-85.
    7. Kumar, Pawan & Kim, Ki-Hyun, 2016. "Recent progress and innovation in carbon capture and storage using bioinspired materials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 383-397.
    8. Hall, Stephen & Roelich, Katy, 2016. "Business model innovation in electricity supply markets: The role of complex value in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 286-298.
    9. Pu‐yan Nie & Yong‐cong Yang, 2020. "Cost‐reduction innovation under mixed economy," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(7), pages 1195-1201, October.
    10. Zhang, Dayong & Cao, Hong & Zou, Peijiang, 2016. "Exuberance in China's renewable energy investment: Rationality, capital structure and implications with firm level evidence," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 468-478.
    11. Almona Tani & Piergiuseppe Morone, 2020. "Policy Implications for the Clean Energy Transition: The Case of the Boston Area," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Pérez de Arce, Miguel & Sauma, Enzo & Contreras, Javier, 2016. "Renewable energy policy performance in reducing CO2 emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 272-280.
    13. Herman, Kyle S. & Xiang, Jun, 2019. "Induced innovation in clean energy technologies from foreign environmental policy stringency?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 198-207.
    14. Bondia, Ripsy & Ghosh, Sajal & Kanjilal, Kakali, 2016. "International crude oil prices and the stock prices of clean energy and technology companies: Evidence from non-linear cointegration tests with unknown structural breaks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 558-565.
    15. Yang, Yong-cong & Nie, Pu-yan & Liu, Hui-ting & Shen, Ming-hao, 2018. "On the welfare effects of subsidy game for renewable energy investment: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 420-428.
    16. Xuemei Xie & Qiwei Zhu & Ruoyi Wang, 2019. "Turning green subsidies into sustainability: How green process innovation improves firms' green image," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1416-1433, November.
    17. Ouchida, Yasunori & Goto, Daisaku, 2016. "Environmental research joint ventures and time-consistent emission tax: Endogenous choice of R&D formation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 179-188.
    18. Noailly, Joëlle & Smeets, Roger, 2015. "Directing technical change from fossil-fuel to renewable energy innovation: An application using firm-level patent data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 15-37.
    19. Aalbers, Rob & Shestalova, Victoria & Kocsis, Viktória, 2013. "Innovation policy for directing technical change in the power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1240-1250.
    20. Yang, Rui & Tang, Wansheng & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2021. "Technology improvement strategy for green products under competition: The role of government subsidy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 553-568.
    21. Gouda, Sirish Kumar & Jonnalagedda, Sreelata & Saranga, Haritha, 2016. "Design for the environment: Impact of regulatory policies on product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 558-570.
    22. Siddiqui, Afzal S. & Tanaka, Makoto & Chen, Yihsu, 2016. "Are targets for renewable portfolio standards too low? The impact of market structure on energy policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 328-341.
    23. Liu, Na & Guan, JianCheng, 2016. "Policy and innovation: Nanoenergy technology in the USA and China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 220-232.
    24. Zhou, Wenhui & Huang, Weixiang, 2016. "Contract designs for energy-saving product development in a monopoly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 902-913.
    25. Gilbert, Alexander Q. & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2016. "Looking the wrong way: Bias, renewable electricity, and energy modelling in the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 533-541.
    26. Sun, Peng & Nie, Pu-yan, 2015. "A comparative study of feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard policy in renewable energy industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 255-262.
    27. Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2012. "Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1770-1778.
    28. Saed Alizamir & Francis de Véricourt & Peng Sun, 2016. "Efficient Feed-In-Tariff Policies for Renewable Energy Technologies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 52-66, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qixiang Yuan & Lin Sun, 2025. "Promoting Green R&D to Allow Green Products to Outcompete Non-Green Products: Subsidize Consumers or Manufacturers?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Ebrahimi Bajgani, Sahar & Saberi, Sara & Toyasaki, Fuminori, 2023. "Designing a reverse supply chain network with quality control for returned products: Strategies to mitigate free-riding effect and ensure compliance with technology licensing requirements," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Ghosh, Indranil & Jana, Rabin K., 2024. "Clean energy stock price forecasting and response to macroeconomic variables: A novel framework using Facebook's Prophet, NeuralProphet and explainable AI," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. You-hua Chen & Zhuang Zhang & Ashok K. Mishra, 2023. "A flexible and efficient hybrid agricultural subsidy design for promoting food security and safety," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Zhang, Zhenhua & Luo, Cong & Zhang, Guoxing & Shu, Yuqin & Shao, Shuai, 2024. "New energy policy and green technology innovation of new energy enterprises: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Li, Ruiqian & Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan, 2024. "The interactive effect of environmental penalties and environmental subsidies on corporate environmental innovation: Is more better or worse?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulo Vitor Levate & Eduardo Gonçalves & Juliana Gonçalves Taveira, 2021. "Regional drivers of green inventions in OECD countries," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 335-354, December.
    2. Li, Kai & Yan, Yaxue & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2021. "Carbon-abatement policies, investment preferences, and directed technological change: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Rik L. Rozendaal & Herman R. J. Vollebergh, 2021. "Policy-Induced Innovation in Clean Technologies: Evidence from the Car Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 9422, CESifo.
    4. Spyros Arvanitis & Michael Peneder & Christian Rammer & Tobias Stucki & Martin Wörter, 2016. "Competitiveness and ecological impacts of green energy technologies: firm-level evidence for the DACH region," KOF Working papers 16-420, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    5. RENTOCCHINI Francesco & VEZZANI Antonio & MONTRESOR Sandro, 2024. "Walking the Green Line: Government Sponsored R&D and Clean Technologies," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2023-01, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Lazkano, Itziar & Pham, Linh, 2016. "Do Fossil fuel Taxes Promote Innovation in Renewable Electricity Generation?," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 16/2016, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    7. Semmler, Willi & Di Bartolomeo, Giovanni & Minooei Fard, Behnaz & Braga, Joao Paulo, 2022. "Limit pricing and entry game of renewable energy firms into the energy sector," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 179-190.
    8. Laura Nowzohour, 2021. "Can Adjustments Costs in Research Derail the Transition to Green Growth ?," CIES Research Paper series 67-2021, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.
    9. Naqvi, Asjad & Stockhammer, Engelbert, 2018. "Directed Technological Change in a Post-Keynesian Ecological Macromodel," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 168-188.
    10. Dobkowitz, Sonja, 2024. "Meeting Climate Targets: The role of fossil research subsidies," VfS Annual Conference 2024 (Berlin): Upcoming Labor Market Challenges 302410, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    11. Gao, Weiyan & Wang, Yuzhang & Wang, Fengrong & Mbanyele, William, 2024. "Do environmental courts break collusion in environmental governance? Evidence from corporate green innovation in China," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 133-149.
    12. Feng, Siyu & Lazkano, Itziar, 2022. "Innovation trends in electricity storage: What drives global innovation?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Lazkano, Itziar & Nøstbakken, Linda & Pelli, Martino, 2017. "From fossil fuels to renewables: The role of electricity storage," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 113-129.
    14. Xie, Ronghui & Teo, Thompson S.H., 2022. "Green technology innovation, environmental externality, and the cleaner upgrading of industrial structure in China — Considering the moderating effect of environmental regulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Hao, Peng & Guo, Jun-Peng & Chen, Yihsu & Xie, Bai-Chen, 2020. "Does a combined strategy outperform independent policies? Impact of incentive policies on renewable power generation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    16. Jee, Su Jung & Srivastav, Sugandha, 2024. "Knowledge spillovers between clean and dirty technologies: Evidence from the patent citation network," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    17. Jin, Wei & Yang, Jun & Wang, Chengfu, 2024. "Cost subsidy or environmental regulation? The effects of government interventions on environmental quality and 3BL performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    18. Ma, Rufei & Cai, Huan & Ji, Qiang & Zhai, Pengxiang, 2021. "The impact of feed-in tariff degression on R&D investment in renewable energy: The case of the solar PV industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Emanuele Campiglio & Alessandro Spiganti & Anthony Wiskich, 2023. "Clean innovation and heterogeneous financing costs," Working Papers 2023: 07, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    20. Yu, Chin-Hsien & Wu, Xiuqin & Lee, Wen-Chieh & Zhao, Jinsong, 2021. "Resource misallocation in the Chinese wind power industry: The role of feed-in tariff policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Clean innovation; Technological spillover effect; Subsidy for innovation; Carbon tax; Emission;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L5 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q4 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:184:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522004620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.