IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v114y2017icp1-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Global Brain as a model of the future information society: An introduction to the special issue

Author

Listed:
  • Heylighen, Francis
  • Lenartowicz, Marta

Abstract

The Global Brain can be defined as the distributed intelligence emerging from all human and technological agents as interacting via the Internet. It plays the role of a nervous system for the social superorganism. A brief history of this idea is sketched, with a focus on the developments leading to the creation of the Global Brain Group, and the Global Brain Institute (GBI) that emerged out of it. As directors of the GBI, the authors of this paper took the initiative of editing a special issue on the topic of “the Global Brain as a model of the future information society”. We briefly sketch the contributions from the different papers in this issue. We conclude by reviewing some common dystopian misconceptions associated with the Global Brain paradigm, and by offering an optimistic outlook on how the “offer network” protocol inspired by this paradigm may lay the foundation for a much more synergetic and sustainable society.

Suggested Citation

  • Heylighen, Francis & Lenartowicz, Marta, 2017. "The Global Brain as a model of the future information society: An introduction to the special issue," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-6.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:114:y:2017:i:c:p:1-6
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004016251630539X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francis Heylighen, 1999. "Collective Intelligence and its Implementation on the Web: Algorithms to Develop a Collective Mental Map," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 253-280, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela Viale Pereira & Elsa Estevez & Diego Cardona & Carlos Chesñevar & Pablo Collazzo-Yelpo & Maria Alexandra Cunha & Eduardo Henrique Diniz & Alex Antonio Ferraresi & Frida Marina Fischer & Flúvi, 2020. "South American Expert Roundtable: Increasing Adaptive Governance Capacity for Coping with Unintended Side Effects of Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-47, January.
    2. Palmås, Karl, 2019. "From hacking to simulation: Periodizing digitally-inspired social theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 105-112.
    3. Roth, Steffen & Dahms, Harry F. & Welz, Frank & Cattacin, Sandro, 2019. "Print theories of computer societies. Introduction to the digital transformation of social theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Parinov, Sergey, 2020. "Общая Теория Согласования Социально-Экономической Деятельности: Коллективные Ментальные Модели [General theory of socio-economic coordination activity: shared mental models]," MPRA Paper 112147, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Roth, Steffen & Schwede, Peter & Valentinov, Vladislav & Pérez-Valls, Miguel & Kaivo-oja, Jari, 2020. "Harnessing big data for a multifunctional theory of the firm," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 54-61.
    6. Guy, Jean-Sébastien, 2019. "Digital technology, digital culture and the metric/nonmetric distinction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 55-61.
    7. Tatiana Marceda Bach & Wesley Vieira Silva & Adriano Mendonça Souza & Claudineia Kudlawicz-Franco & Claudimar Pereira Veiga, 2020. "Online customer behavior: perceptions regarding the types of risks incurred through online purchases," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. JinHyo Joseph Yun & EuiSeob Jeong & Xiaofei Zhao & Sung Deuk Hahm & KyungHun Kim, 2019. "Collective Intelligence: An Emerging World in Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Enrico Imbimbo & Federica Stefanelli & Andrea Guazzini, 2020. "Adolescent’s Collective Intelligence: Empirical Evidence in Real and Online Classmates Groups," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Yuan-Chu Hwang & Soe-Tsyr Yuan & Jung-Hui Weng, 2011. "A study of the impacts of positive/negative feedback on collective wisdom—case study on social bookmarking sites," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 265-279, April.
    4. Heylighen, Francis, 2017. "Towards an intelligent network for matching offer and demand: From the sharing economy to the global brain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 74-85.
    5. Jinhyo Joseph Yun & Zheng Liu & Euiseob Jeong & Sangwoo Kim & Kyunghun Kim, 2022. "The Difference in Open Innovation between Open Access and Closed Access, According to the Change of Collective Intelligence and Knowledge Amount," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Runsten, Philip, 2017. "TEAM INTELLIGENCE: THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTELLIGENT ORGANIZATIONS - A Literature Review," SSE Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2017:2, Stockholm School of Economics.
    7. Sven Dittes & Stefan Smolnik, 2019. "Towards a digital work environment: the influence of collaboration and networking on employee performance within an enterprise social media platform," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(8), pages 1215-1243, December.
    8. Kristian Stålne & Eja Pedersen, 2021. "Transdisciplinary Research on Indoor Environment and Health as a Social Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Timoteo Carletti & Alessio Guarino & Andrea Guazzini & Federica Stefanelli, 2020. "Problem Solving: When Groups Perform Better Than Teammates," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 23(3), pages 1-4.
    10. Fan Yang & Wen Dong, 2020. "Integrating simulation and signal processing in tracking complex social systems," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:114:y:2017:i:c:p:1-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.