IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v215y2024ics0167715224001986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Replication in random translation designs

Author

Listed:
  • Waite, Timothy W.

Abstract

Replication is a commonly recommended feature of experimental designs. However, its impact in model-robust design is relatively under-explored; indeed, replication is impossible within the current formulation of random translation designs, which were introduced recently for model-robust prediction. Here we extend the framework of random translation designs to allow replication, and quantify the resulting performance impact. The extension permits a simplification of our earlier heuristic for constructing random translation strategies from a traditional V-optimal design. Namely, in the previous formulation any replicates of the V-optimal design first had to be split up before a random translation can be applied to the design points. With the new framework we can instead preserve the replicates instead if we so wish. Surprisingly, we find that in low-dimensional problems it is often substantially more efficient to continue to split replicates, while in high-dimensional problems it can be substantially better to retain replicates.

Suggested Citation

  • Waite, Timothy W., 2024. "Replication in random translation designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:215:y:2024:i:c:s0167715224001986
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2024.110229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224001986
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2024.110229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:215:y:2024:i:c:s0167715224001986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.