IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v127y2018icp217-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal designs for dose–response models with linear effects of covariates

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Jun
  • Kong, Xiangshun
  • Ai, Mingyao
  • Tsui, Kwok Leung

Abstract

Personalized medicine is becoming more and more important nowadays since the efficacy of a certain medicine vary among different patients. This requires to combine the effects of the prognostic factors or covariates along with different dosages when planning a dose–response experiment. Statistically, this corresponds to the construction of optimal designs for estimating dose–response curves in the presence of covariates. Some characteristics of the optimal designs are derived in order to search such optimal designs efficiently, and an equivalence theorem of the locally ϕs-optimal designs is established accordingly. Computational issues are also studied and presented with theoretical backups. As applications of the above theories, the locally optimal designs are searched out in several situations. Some simulations reveal that the searched locally optimal designs are robust to the moderate misspecification of the prespecified parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Jun & Kong, Xiangshun & Ai, Mingyao & Tsui, Kwok Leung, 2018. "Optimal designs for dose–response models with linear effects of covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 217-228.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:127:y:2018:i:c:p:217-228
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2018.05.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947318301269
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2018.05.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. C. Atkinson, 2015. "Optimum designs for two treatments with unequal variances in the presence of covariates," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(2), pages 494-499.
    2. H. Dette & C. Kiss & M. Bevanda & F. Bretz, 2010. "Optimal designs for the emax, log-linear and exponential models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 97(2), pages 513-518.
    3. Arne Henningsen & Ott Toomet, 2011. "maxLik: A package for maximum likelihood estimation in R," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 443-458, September.
    4. F. Bretz & J. C. Pinheiro & M. Branson, 2005. "Combining Multiple Comparisons and Modeling Techniques in Dose-Response Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 738-748, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Hengzhen & Chen, Xueping, 2021. "Compromise design for combination experiment of two drugs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Yu, Jun & Meng, Xiran & Wang, Yaping, 2023. "Optimal designs for semi-parametric dose-response models under random contamination," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Jun & Meng, Xiran & Wang, Yaping, 2023. "Optimal designs for semi-parametric dose-response models under random contamination," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Maness, Michael & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2016. "An indirect latent informational conformity social influence choice model: Formulation and case study," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 75-101.
    3. Mazen Nassar & Refah Alotaibi & Ahmed Elshahhat, 2023. "Reliability Estimation of XLindley Constant-Stress Partially Accelerated Life Tests using Progressively Censored Samples," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Kathrin Möllenhoff & Frank Bretz & Holger Dette, 2020. "Equivalence of regression curves sharing common parameters," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 518-529, June.
    5. Francesco De Pretis & Barbara Osimani, 2019. "New Insights in Computational Methods for Pharmacovigilance: E-Synthesis , a Bayesian Framework for Causal Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. John-Fritz Thony & Jean Vaillant, 2022. "Parameter Estimation for a Fractional Black–Scholes Model with Jumps from Discrete Time Observations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Badamasi Abba & Hong Wang, 2024. "A new failure times model for one and two failure modes system: A Bayesian study with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo simulation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(2), pages 304-323, April.
    8. Johan Verbeeck & Martin Geroldinger & Konstantin Thiel & Andrew Craig Hooker & Sebastian Ueckert & Mats Karlsson & Arne Cornelius Bathke & Johann Wolfgang Bauer & Geert Molenberghs & Georg Zimmermann, 2023. "How to analyze continuous and discrete repeated measures in small‐sample cross‐over trials?," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3998-4011, December.
    9. Logar, Ivana & Brouwer, Roy & Campbell, Danny, 2020. "Does attribute order influence attribute-information processing in discrete choice experiments?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Padayachee Trishanta & Khamiakova Tatsiana & Shkedy Ziv & Salo Perttu & Perola Markus & Burzykowski Tomasz, 2019. "A multivariate linear model for investigating the association between gene-module co-expression and a continuous covariate," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Qiqi Deng & Kun Wang & Xiaofei Bai & Naitee Ting, 2019. "A Cautionary Note When a Dose-Ranging Study is Used for Proving the Concept," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(1), pages 127-140, April.
    12. Wang, Shengjie & Kang, Yanfei & Petropoulos, Fotios, 2024. "Combining probabilistic forecasts of intermittent demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1038-1048.
    13. Beibei Guo & Ying Yuan, 2023. "DROID: dose‐ranging approach to optimizing dose in oncology drug development," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 2907-2919, December.
    14. Refah Alotaibi & Mazen Nassar & Hoda Rezk & Ahmed Elshahhat, 2022. "Inferences and Engineering Applications of Alpha Power Weibull Distribution Using Progressive Type-II Censoring," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Muhammet Burak Kılıç & Yusuf Şahin & Melih Burak Koca, 2021. "Genetic algorithm approach with an adaptive search space based on EM algorithm in two-component mixture Weibull parameter estimation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1219-1242, June.
    16. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2014. "Modeling rating data with Nonlinear CUB models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 100-118.
    17. Teresa Backhaus, 2022. "Training in Late Careers - A Structural Approach," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2022_382, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    18. Liu, W. & Ah-Kine, P. & Bretz, F. & Hayter, A.J., 2013. "Exact simultaneous confidence intervals for a finite set of contrasts of three, four or five generally correlated normal means," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 141-148.
    19. Hancock, Thomas O. & Broekaert, Jan & Hess, Stephane & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2020. "Quantum choice models: A flexible new approach for understanding moral decision-making," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    20. Granado-Díaz, Rubén & Villanueva, Anastasio J. & Gómez-Limón, José A., 2022. "Willingness to accept for rewilding farmland in environmentally sensitive areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:127:y:2018:i:c:p:217-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.