IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v127y2018icp217-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal designs for dose–response models with linear effects of covariates

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Jun
  • Kong, Xiangshun
  • Ai, Mingyao
  • Tsui, Kwok Leung

Abstract

Personalized medicine is becoming more and more important nowadays since the efficacy of a certain medicine vary among different patients. This requires to combine the effects of the prognostic factors or covariates along with different dosages when planning a dose–response experiment. Statistically, this corresponds to the construction of optimal designs for estimating dose–response curves in the presence of covariates. Some characteristics of the optimal designs are derived in order to search such optimal designs efficiently, and an equivalence theorem of the locally ϕs-optimal designs is established accordingly. Computational issues are also studied and presented with theoretical backups. As applications of the above theories, the locally optimal designs are searched out in several situations. Some simulations reveal that the searched locally optimal designs are robust to the moderate misspecification of the prespecified parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Jun & Kong, Xiangshun & Ai, Mingyao & Tsui, Kwok Leung, 2018. "Optimal designs for dose–response models with linear effects of covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 217-228.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:127:y:2018:i:c:p:217-228
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2018.05.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947318301269
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2018.05.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F. Bretz & J. C. Pinheiro & M. Branson, 2005. "Combining Multiple Comparisons and Modeling Techniques in Dose-Response Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 738-748, September.
    2. H. Dette & C. Kiss & M. Bevanda & F. Bretz, 2010. "Optimal designs for the emax, log-linear and exponential models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 97(2), pages 513-518.
    3. Arne Henningsen & Ott Toomet, 2011. "maxLik: A package for maximum likelihood estimation in R," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 443-458, September.
    4. A. C. Atkinson, 2015. "Optimum designs for two treatments with unequal variances in the presence of covariates," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(2), pages 494-499.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu, Jun & Meng, Xiran & Wang, Yaping, 2023. "Optimal designs for semi-parametric dose-response models under random contamination," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Huang, Hengzhen & Chen, Xueping, 2021. "Compromise design for combination experiment of two drugs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Jun & Meng, Xiran & Wang, Yaping, 2023. "Optimal designs for semi-parametric dose-response models under random contamination," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Maness, Michael & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2016. "An indirect latent informational conformity social influence choice model: Formulation and case study," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 75-101.
    3. Kathrin Möllenhoff & Frank Bretz & Holger Dette, 2020. "Equivalence of regression curves sharing common parameters," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 518-529, June.
    4. John-Fritz Thony & Jean Vaillant, 2022. "Parameter Estimation for a Fractional Black–Scholes Model with Jumps from Discrete Time Observations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Wang, Shengjie & Kang, Yanfei & Petropoulos, Fotios, 2024. "Combining probabilistic forecasts of intermittent demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1038-1048.
    6. Beibei Guo & Ying Yuan, 2023. "DROID: dose‐ranging approach to optimizing dose in oncology drug development," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 2907-2919, December.
    7. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2014. "Modeling rating data with Nonlinear CUB models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 100-118.
    8. Teresa Backhaus, 2022. "Training in Late Careers - A Structural Approach," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2022_382, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    9. Hancock, Thomas O. & Broekaert, Jan & Hess, Stephane & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2020. "Quantum choice models: A flexible new approach for understanding moral decision-making," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    10. Granado-Díaz, Rubén & Villanueva, Anastasio J. & Gómez-Limón, José A., 2022. "Willingness to accept for rewilding farmland in environmentally sensitive areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Thoralf Meyer & Paul Holloway & Thomas B. Christiansen & Jennifer A. Miller & Paolo D’Odorico & Gregory S. Okin, 2019. "An Assessment of Multiple Drivers Determining Woody Species Composition and Structure: A Case Study from the Kalahari, Botswana," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Peter Andre, 2022. "Shallow Meritocracy," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2022_318v3, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    13. Jens Rommel & Julian Sagebiel & Marieke Cornelia Baaken & Jesús Barreiro‐Hurlé & Douadia Bougherara & Luigi Cembalo & Marija Cerjak & Tajana Čop & Mikołaj Czajkowski & María Espinosa‐Goded & Julia Höh, 2023. "Farmers' risk preferences in 11 European farming systems: A multi‐country replication of Bocquého et al. ()," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1374-1399, September.
    14. Sarrias, Mauricio, 2021. "A two recursive equation model to correct for endogeneity in latent class binary probit models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    15. Hancock, Thomas O. & Hess, Stephane & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2018. "Decision field theory: Improvements to current methodology and comparisons with standard choice modelling techniques," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 18-40.
    16. Maciej Berk{e}sewicz & Katarzyna Pawlukiewicz, 2020. "Estimation of the number of irregular foreigners in Poland using non-linear count regression models," Papers 2008.09407, arXiv.org.
    17. Kim-Hung Pho & Tuan-Kiet Tran & Thi Diem-Chinh Ho & Wing-Keung Wong, 2019. "Optimal Solution Techniques in Decision Sciences A Review," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 23(1), pages 114-161, March.
    18. Marco Bonetti & Ugofilippo Basellini, 2021. "Epilocal: A real-time tool for local epidemic monitoring," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(12), pages 307-332.
    19. Hancock, Thomas O. & Hess, Stephane & Marley, A.A.J. & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2021. "An accumulation of preference: Two alternative dynamic models for understanding transport choices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 250-282.
    20. Benjamin R. Thomson & Pan Liu & Tuncer Onay & Jing Du & Stuart W. Tompson & Sol Misener & Raj R. Purohit & Terri L. Young & Jing Jin & Susan E. Quaggin, 2021. "Cellular crosstalk regulates the aqueous humor outflow pathway and provides new targets for glaucoma therapies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:127:y:2018:i:c:p:217-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.