IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v120y2017icp135-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new explanatory index for evaluating the binary logistic regression based on the sensitivity of the estimated model

Author

Listed:
  • Ramos, Héctor M.
  • Ollero, Jorge
  • Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso

Abstract

We propose a new explanatory index for evaluating the binary logistic regression model based on the sensitivity of the estimated model. We previously formalized the idea of sensitivity and established the principles a statistic should comply with to be considered a sensitivity index. We apply the results to a practical example and compare the results with those obtained utilizing other indices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramos, Héctor M. & Ollero, Jorge & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2017. "A new explanatory index for evaluating the binary logistic regression based on the sensitivity of the estimated model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 135-140.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:120:y:2017:i:c:p:135-140
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2016.08.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715216302048
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2016.08.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John G. Cragg & Russell S. Uhler, 1970. "The Demand for Automobiles," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 3(3), pages 386-406, August.
    2. Tjur, Tue, 2009. "Coefficients of Determination in Logistic Regression Models—A New Proposal: The Coefficient of Discrimination," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 63(4), pages 366-372.
    3. Roger Newson, 2002. "Parameters behind "nonparametric" statistics: Kendall's tau,Somers' D and median differences," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 2(1), pages 45-64, February.
    4. Colin Cameron, A. & Windmeijer, Frank A. G., 1997. "An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 329-342, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sudhir Kumar Soam & Surya Rathore & Basavapatna Subbanna Yashavanth & Thammi Raju Dhumantarao & Rakesh S. & Raghupathi Balasani, 2023. "Students’ Perspectives on Entrepreneurship and Its Intention in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Huasheng Zhu & Yawei Chen & Kebi Chen, 2019. "Vitalizing Rural Communities: China’s Rural Entrepreneurial Activities from Perspective of Mixed Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghazi Falah & Michael Hoy & Rakhal Sarker, 2000. "Co-existence in Selected Mixed Arab-Jewish Cities in Israel: By Choice or by Default?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(4), pages 775-796, April.
    2. Dirk Tasche, 2009. "Estimating discriminatory power and PD curves when the number of defaults is small," Papers 0905.3928, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2010.
    3. Cowell, Frank & Flachaire, Emmanuel & Bandyopadhyay, Sanghamitra, 2009. "Goodness-of-fit: an economic approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 25433, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Ingo Geishecker & Philipp J. H. Schröder & Allan S⊘rensen, 2019. "One‐off export events," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 93-131, February.
    5. Hiau LooiKee & Alessandro Nicita & Marcelo Olarreaga, 2009. "Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(534), pages 172-199, January.
    6. Alexandre Vimont & Henri Leleu & Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, 2022. "Machine learning versus regression modelling in predicting individual healthcare costs from a representative sample of the nationwide claims database in France," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(2), pages 211-223, March.
    7. R. Rajesh & Chandrasekharan Rajendran, 2020. "Relating Environmental, Social, and Governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1247-1267, March.
    8. Li, Jiarong & Li, Xiangdong & Wang, Yong & Tu, Jiyuan, 2020. "A theoretical model of natural circulation flow and heat transfer within horizontal evacuated tube considering the secondary flow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 630-638.
    9. Zachary D Rethorn & Alessandra N Garcia & Chad E Cook & Oren N Gottfried, 2020. "Quantifying the collective influence of social determinants of health using conditional and cluster modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Daifeng Xiang & Gangsheng Wang & Jing Tian & Wanyu Li, 2023. "Global patterns and edaphic-climatic controls of soil carbon decomposition kinetics predicted from incubation experiments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Cornwell, Benjamin & Yan, Xuewen & Carlin, Rebecca F. & Fu, Linda & Wang, Jichuan & Moon, Rachel Y., 2021. "Social network influences on new mothers’ infant sleep adjustments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    12. Roberto Mari & Salvatore Ingrassia & Antonio Punzo, 2023. "Local and Overall Deviance R-Squared Measures for Mixtures of Generalized Linear Models," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 40(2), pages 233-266, July.
    13. John, Katrin & Thomsen, Stephan L., 2015. "School-track environment or endowment: What determines different other-regarding behavior across peer groups?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 122-141.
    14. M. Tudela & G. Young, 2005. "A Merton-Model Approach To Assessing The Default Risk Of Uk Public Companies," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(06), pages 737-761.
    15. Jean‐Louis Arcand & Dany Jaimovich, 2019. "Does ethnic diversity decrease economic interactions? Evidence from exchange networks in rural Gambia," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 327-353, February.
    16. Otto Toivanen & Michael Waterson, 2005. "Market Structure and Entry: Where's the Beef?," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(3), pages 680-699, Autumn.
    17. Laurion, Henry, 2020. "Implications of Non-GAAP earnings for real activities and accounting choices," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1).
    18. Takeshi Kurosawa & Francis K.C. Hui & A.H. Welsh & Kousuke Shinmura & Nobuoki Eshima, 2020. "On goodness‐of‐fit measures for Poisson regression models," Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Australian Statistical Publishing Association Inc., vol. 62(3), pages 340-366, September.
    19. Burkey, Mark L. & Obeng, Kofi, 2005. "Crash Risk Reduction at Signalized Intersections Using Longitudinal Data," MPRA Paper 36281, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Daniel Griffith & David Wong, 2007. "Modeling population density across major US cities: a polycentric spatial regression approach," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 53-75, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:120:y:2017:i:c:p:135-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.