IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v361y2024ics027795362400830x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Types of genetic determinism in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health

Author

Listed:
  • Friedman, Asia
  • Anderson, Tammy L.

Abstract

Prior research has challenged genetic determinism by highlighting the complex ways lay people engage with genetics. However, most of these critiques took place prior to the availability of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic health testing and were based on reactions to genetic testing administered in a clinical context due to either symptoms or family history. Today, many lay people interact with genetic health information outside of medicine, and often without pre-existing symptoms or family history. This suggests the need to revisit genetic determinism in the context of this new mode of public engagement with genetic information about health. In this paper we examine how a sample of 39 people who had previously taken a DTC genetic test for health make sense of their results. We find genetic determinism is prominent, but takes on several distinct forms, including protective determinism, motivating determinism, and absolute determinism. Considering this, we argue that genetic determinism should not be treated as a singular or fixed concept and cannot be dismissed as insignificant, given its continued salience for DTC genetic test-takers. Our analysis also pays particular attention to how test-takers interpret negative results (i.e., no elevated risks detected), as this is a common outcome of DTC genetic tests but has not been a focus of prior research.

Suggested Citation

  • Friedman, Asia & Anderson, Tammy L., 2024. "Types of genetic determinism in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:361:y:2024:i:c:s027795362400830x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362400830X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caiata-Zufferey, Maria, 2015. "Genetically at-risk status and individual agency. A qualitative study on asymptomatic women living with genetic risk of breast/ovarian cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 141-148.
    2. Brookes-Howell, Lucy Claire, 2006. "Living without labels: The interactional management of diagnostic uncertainty in the genetic counselling clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 3080-3091, December.
    3. Chilibeck, Gillian & Lock, Margaret & Sehdev, Megha, 2011. "Postgenomics, uncertain futures, and the familiarization of susceptibility genes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(11), pages 1768-1775, June.
    4. Campbell, Patricia A., 2021. "Lay participation with medical expertise in online self-care practices: Social knowledge (co)production in the Running Mania injury forum," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    5. Grace, Victoria M. & Daniels, Ken R. & Gillett, Wayne, 2008. "The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents' constructions in the case of donor insemination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 301-314, January.
    6. Senior, Victoria & Marteau, Theresa M. & Peters, Timothy J., 1999. "Will genetic testing for predisposition for disease result in fatalism? A qualitative study of parents responses to neonatal screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(12), pages 1857-1860, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nordqvist, Petra, 2011. "Choreographies of sperm donations: Dilemmas of intimacy in lesbian couple donor conception," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(11), pages 1661-1668.
    2. Werner-Lin, Allison & Forbes Shepherd, Rowan & Young, Jennifer L. & Wilsnack, Catherine & Merrill, Shana L. & Greene, Mark H. & Khincha, Payal P., 2022. "Embodied risk for families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: Like electricity through my body," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    3. Buchbinder, Mara & Timmermans, Stefan, 2011. "Newborn screening and maternal diagnosis: Rethinking family benefit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(7), pages 1014-1018.
    4. Theresa M. Marteau & Scott Roberts & Susan LaRusse & Robert C. Green, 2005. "Predictive Genetic Testing for Alzheimer's Disease: Impact upon Risk Perception," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 397-404, April.
    5. Jae-Mahn Shim, 2022. "Patient Agency: Manifestations of Individual Agency Among People With Health Problems," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    6. Boardman, Felicity & Clark, Corinna, 2022. "‘We're kind of like genetic nomads': Parents' experiences of biographical disruption and uncertainty following in/conclusive results from newborn cystic fibrosis screening," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    7. Tian, Xiaoli & Zhang, Sai, 2022. "Expert or experiential knowledge? How knowledge informs situated action in childcare practices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    8. Will, Catherine M. & Armstrong, David & Marteau, Theresa M., 2010. "Genetic unexceptionalism: Clinician accounts of genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 910-917, September.
    9. Saukko, Paula M. & Richards, Suzanne H. & Shepherd, Maggie H. & Campbell, John L., 2006. "Are genetic tests exceptional? Lessons from a qualitative study on thrombophilia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 1947-1959, October.
    10. Hertz, Rosanna & Nelson, Margaret K. & Kramer, Wendy, 2015. "Gendering gametes: The unequal contributions of sperm and egg donors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 10-19.
    11. Paul, Katharina T. & Pichelstorfer, Anna & Hansl, Nora & Martin, Maximilian & Pucker, Paula-Marie & Zhikharevich, Dmitrii, 2024. "“I can't see the forest for the ticks, uhm, trees …”: The role of online forums in parents' vaccination trajectories," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    12. Jessecae K. Marsh & Nick D. Ungson & Dominic J. Packer, 2021. "Of Pandemics and Zombies: The Influence of Prior Concepts on COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-17, May.
    13. Hertz, Rosanna & Nelson, Margaret K. & Kramer, Wendy, 2013. "Donor conceived offspring conceive of the donor: The relevance of age, awareness, and family form," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 52-65.
    14. Smailhodzic, Edin & Boonstra, Albert & Langley, David J., 2021. "Social media enabled interactions in healthcare: Towards a taxonomy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    15. Vailly, Joëlle, 2006. "Genetic screening as a technique of government: The case of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 3092-3101, December.
    16. August-Rae, Brianna C. & Baker, Jonathan T. & Buzzanell, Patrice M., 2024. "“Not just rebellious, it's revolutionary”: Do-it-yourself hormone replacement therapy as Liberatory Harm Reduction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    17. Whitmarsh, Ian & Davis, Arlene M. & Skinner, Debra & Bailey, Donald Jr., 2007. "A place for genetic uncertainty: Parents valuing an unknown in the meaning of disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 1082-1093, September.
    18. Marteau, Theresa M. & Weinman, John, 2006. "Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: A theoretical analysis and framework for future research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 1360-1368, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:361:y:2024:i:c:s027795362400830x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.