IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v48y1999i12p1857-1860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will genetic testing for predisposition for disease result in fatalism? A qualitative study of parents responses to neonatal screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia

Author

Listed:
  • Senior, Victoria
  • Marteau, Theresa M.
  • Peters, Timothy J.

Abstract

Objective: to describe parents' perceptions of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), an inherited predisposition to heart disease, following population-based neonatal screening. Design: a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with the parents of 24 children who had received a positive screening test result informing them that their child was at-risk for having FH. Results: responses to screening seemed to vary according to perceptions of the underlying cause of the positive screening test result. When parents perceived the test as detecting raised cholesterol the condition was perceived as familiar, dietary in origin, controllable and less threatening. When the test was seen as detecting a genetic problem, the condition was perceived as uncontrollable and, hence, more threatening. Conclusion: these pilot data raise questions about the extent to which assessing disease risks by DNA analysis may result in a sense of fatalism, adversely affecting motivation to change behaviour and to reduce risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Senior, Victoria & Marteau, Theresa M. & Peters, Timothy J., 1999. "Will genetic testing for predisposition for disease result in fatalism? A qualitative study of parents responses to neonatal screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(12), pages 1857-1860, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:48:y:1999:i:12:p:1857-1860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00099-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vailly, Joƫlle, 2006. "Genetic screening as a technique of government: The case of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 3092-3101, December.
    2. Marteau, Theresa M. & Weinman, John, 2006. "Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: A theoretical analysis and framework for future research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 1360-1368, March.
    3. Theresa M. Marteau & Scott Roberts & Susan LaRusse & Robert C. Green, 2005. "Predictive Genetic Testing for Alzheimer's Disease: Impact upon Risk Perception," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 397-404, April.
    4. Jessecae K. Marsh & Nick D. Ungson & Dominic J. Packer, 2021. "Of Pandemics and Zombies: The Influence of Prior Concepts on COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Will, Catherine M. & Armstrong, David & Marteau, Theresa M., 2010. "Genetic unexceptionalism: Clinician accounts of genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 910-917, September.
    6. Saukko, Paula M. & Richards, Suzanne H. & Shepherd, Maggie H. & Campbell, John L., 2006. "Are genetic tests exceptional? Lessons from a qualitative study on thrombophilia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 1947-1959, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:48:y:1999:i:12:p:1857-1860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.