IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v147y2015icp10-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gendering gametes: The unequal contributions of sperm and egg donors

Author

Listed:
  • Hertz, Rosanna
  • Nelson, Margaret K.
  • Kramer, Wendy

Abstract

This paper compares three groups of gestational mothers who relied on gametes from donors they did not know. The three groups are women who have conceived with donor sperm and their own eggs, women who have conceived with donor eggs and a partner's sperm, and women who have conceived with embryos composed of both donor eggs and donor sperm. The paper explores three issues. First, it considers whether intending parents select sperm and egg donors for different attributes both when they are chosen as the only donor and when they are chosen as donors contributing to an entire embryo. Second, it examines how women imagine the donor. Finally, it looks at how women conceptualize the donor as an individual who contributes to their child's characteristics. Two significant findings emerged in this analysis of survey data. First, the data show that gametes are gendered with different attributes both when those gametes are separate and even more so when seen as complementary parts of a whole. Second, the data show that women minimize the impact of the egg donor (both when a sole contribution and especially when part of the complementary whole) and thus ignore the influence or impact of the egg donor relative to how they make sense of the influence or impact of the sperm donor. The data for this study comes from an online survey developed by the authors.

Suggested Citation

  • Hertz, Rosanna & Nelson, Margaret K. & Kramer, Wendy, 2015. "Gendering gametes: The unequal contributions of sperm and egg donors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 10-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:147:y:2015:i:c:p:10-19
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795361530188X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grace, Victoria M. & Daniels, Ken R. & Gillett, Wayne, 2008. "The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents' constructions in the case of donor insemination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 301-314, January.
    2. Johnson, Katherine M., 2013. "Making families: Organizational boundary work in US egg and sperm donation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 64-71.
    3. Benno Torgler & Stephen Whyte, 2013. "Selection Criteria in the Search for a Sperm Donor: Internal Versus External Attributes," CREMA Working Paper Series 2013-22, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nordqvist, Petra, 2011. "Choreographies of sperm donations: Dilemmas of intimacy in lesbian couple donor conception," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(11), pages 1661-1668.
    2. Hertz, Rosanna & Nelson, Margaret K. & Kramer, Wendy, 2013. "Donor conceived offspring conceive of the donor: The relevance of age, awareness, and family form," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 52-65.
    3. Miner, Skye A., 2021. "“I would want to pay her”: Challenging altruistic egg exchanges in Canada through moral patchworks," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:147:y:2015:i:c:p:10-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.