IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v325y2023ics0277953623002526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships

Author

Listed:
  • Emmons, Karen M.
  • Mendez, Samuel
  • Lee, Rebekka M.
  • Erani, Diana
  • Mascioli, Lynette
  • Abreu, Marlene
  • Adams, Susan
  • Daly, James
  • Bierer, Barbara E.

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, the National Institutes for Health (NIH) has implemented several policies designed to improve sharing of research data, such as the NIH public access policy for publications, NIH genomic data sharing policy, and National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Moonshot public access and data sharing policy. In January 2023, a new NIH data sharing policy has gone into effect, requiring researchers to submit a Data Management and Sharing Plan in proposals for NIH funding (NIH. Supplemental information to the, 2020b; NIH. Final policy for data, 2020a). These policies are based on the idea that sharing data is a key component of the scientific method, as it enables the creation of larger data repositories that can lead to research questions that may not be possible in individual studies (Alter and Gonzalez, 2018; Jwa and Poldrack, 2022), allows enhanced collaboration, and maximizes the federal investment in research. Important questions that we must consider as data sharing is expanded are to whom do benefits of data sharing accrue and to whom do benefits not accrue? In an era of growing efforts to engage diverse communities in research, we must consider the impact of data sharing for all research participants and the communities that they represent.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmons, Karen M. & Mendez, Samuel & Lee, Rebekka M. & Erani, Diana & Mascioli, Lynette & Abreu, Marlene & Adams, Susan & Daly, James & Bierer, Barbara E., 2023. "Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:325:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623002526
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623002526
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115895?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2022. "Medicare eligibility," Chapters, in: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Dementia, chapter 4, pages 50-66, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Sarah Banks & Andrea Armstrong & Kathleen Carter & Helen Graham & Peter Hayward & Alex Henry & Tessa Holland & Claire Holmes & Amelia Lee & Ann McNulty & Niamh Moore & Nigel Nayling & Ann Stokoe & Ail, 2013. "Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 263-277, November.
    3. Michela Antonelli & Annika Reinke & Spyridon Bakas & Keyvan Farahani & Annette Kopp-Schneider & Bennett A. Landman & Geert Litjens & Bjoern Menze & Olaf Ronneberger & Ronald M. Summers & Bram Ginneken, 2022. "The Medical Segmentation Decathlon," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Riad Alharbey & Jong In Kim & Ali Daud & Min Song & Abdulrahman A. Alshdadi & Malik Khizar Hayat, 2022. "Indexing important drugs from medical literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2661-2681, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maclean, Johanna Catherine & Tello-Trillo, Sebastian & Webber, Douglas, 2023. "Losing insurance and psychiatric hospitalizations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 508-527.
    2. Li, Shengxiao (Alex), 2023. "Revisiting the relationship between information and communication technologies and travel behavior: An investigation of older Americans," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Dagogo Legg-Jack & Clever Ndebele, 2022. "Relevance of industry stakeholder partnership in the production of skilled electrical engineering trade graduates," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 398-409, December.
    4. Diana Mitlin & Jhono Bennett & Philipp Horn & Sophie King & Jack Makau & George Masimba Nyama, 2019. "Knowledge Matters - the potential contribution of the co-production of research to urban transformation," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 392019, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    5. Trbus, Marina & Zečević, Ivana & Wright, Laura Helen Virginia, 2023. "Perspectives of children and young people from Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina on their role in challenging perceived social and gender norms impacting school related gender-based violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Paulina Rytkönen & Håkan Tunón, 2020. "Summer Farmers, Diversification and Rural Tourism—Challenges and Opportunities in the Wake of the Entrepreneurial Turn in Swedish Policies (1991–2019)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
    7. María Inés Cubides Kovacsics & Alejandro Lanz Sánchez, 2014. "Police Abuse and Sex Workers – The Two Wings of the Butterfly: Negotiating Ethical Dilemmas in Participatory Action Research (PAR) in Bogotá, Colombia," Documentos de trabajo 17681, Escuela de Gobierno - Universidad de los Andes.
    8. Pearson Nkhoma & Helen Charnley, 2018. "Child Protection and Social Inequality: Understanding Child Prostitution in Malawi," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Leila Maria Kehl, 2018. "Participatory Ethics in Biotech Research Decisions," Working Papers 39, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2021.
    10. Jessica Pykett & Benjamin Chrisinger & Kalliopi Kyriakou & Tess Osborne & Bernd Resch & Afroditi Stathi & Eszter Toth & Anna C. Whittaker, 2020. "Developing a Citizen Social Science approach to understand urban stress and promote wellbeing in urban communities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Roxana Roos, 2024. "“Maybe you need to do something about it”: challenges in global environmental change research with and within local communities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Dennehy, Rebecca & Meaney, Sarah & Cronin, Mary & Arensman, Ella, 2020. "The psychosocial impacts of cybervictimisation and barriers to seeking social support: Young people’s perspectives," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    13. Jun Ma & Yuting He & Feifei Li & Lin Han & Chenyu You & Bo Wang, 2024. "Segment anything in medical images," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Jeffries, Jayne M., 2018. "Negotiating acquired spinal conditions: Recovery with/in bodily materiality and fluids," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 61-69.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Data sharing; Community-engaged research;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:325:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623002526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.