IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v127y2022i5d10.1007_s11192-022-04340-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indexing important drugs from medical literature

Author

Listed:
  • Riad Alharbey

    (University of Jeddah)

  • Jong In Kim

    (Yonsei University)

  • Ali Daud

    (University of Jeddah
    Zhejiang Ocean University)

  • Min Song

    (Yonsei University)

  • Abdulrahman A. Alshdadi

    (University of Jeddah)

  • Malik Khizar Hayat

    (The University of Haripur
    Macquarie University)

Abstract

Health maintenance is one of the foremost pillars of human society which needs up-to-date solutions to medical problems. The advancement in the biomedical field has intensified the—information load that exists in the form of clinic reports, research papers, or lab tests, etc. Extracting meaningful insights from this corpus is equally important as its progress—to make it valuable for recent medicine. In terms of biomedical text mining, the areas explored include protein–protein interactions, entity-relationship detection, and so on. The biomedical effects of drugs have significance when administered to a living organism. Biomedical literature is not widely explored in terms of gene-drug relations, hence needs investigation. Indexing methods can be used for ranking gene-drug relations. In scientific literature, Hirsch’s the h-index is usually used to quantify the impact of an individual author. Likewise, in this research, we propose the Drug-Index, a quantifiable measure that can be used to detect gene-drug relations. It is useful in drug discovery, diagnosing, personalized treatment using suitable drugs for relevant genes. For a strong and reliable gene-drug relationship discovery, drugs are extracted from a subset of MEDLINE—a bibliographic medical database. The detected drugs are verified from the PharmacoGenomics KnowledgeBase (PharmGKB)—a publicly available medical knowledgebase by Stanford University.

Suggested Citation

  • Riad Alharbey & Jong In Kim & Ali Daud & Min Song & Abdulrahman A. Alshdadi & Malik Khizar Hayat, 2022. "Indexing important drugs from medical literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2661-2681, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04340-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04340-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-022-04340-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-022-04340-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianluca Fabiano & Andrea Marcellusi & Giampiero Favato, 2020. "Public–private contribution to biopharmaceutical discoveries: a bibliometric analysis of biomedical research in UK," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 153-168, July.
    2. Xiaoying Li & Suyuan Peng & Jian Du, 2021. "Towards medical knowmetrics: representing and computing medical knowledge using semantic predications as the knowledge unit and the uncertainty as the knowledge context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6225-6251, July.
    3. Xuefeng Wang & Shuo Zhang & Yao Wu & Xuemei Yang, 2021. "Revealing potential drug-disease-gene association patterns for precision medicine," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 3723-3748, May.
    4. Kathleen M. Giacomini & Ronald M. Krauss & Dan M. Roden & Michel Eichelbaum & Michael R. Hayden & Yusuke Nakamura, 2007. "When good drugs go bad," Nature, Nature, vol. 446(7139), pages 975-977, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Shengxiao (Alex), 2023. "Revisiting the relationship between information and communication technologies and travel behavior: An investigation of older Americans," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Maclean, Johanna Catherine & Tello-Trillo, Sebastian & Webber, Douglas, 2023. "Losing insurance and psychiatric hospitalizations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 508-527.
    3. Emmons, Karen M. & Mendez, Samuel & Lee, Rebekka M. & Erani, Diana & Mascioli, Lynette & Abreu, Marlene & Adams, Susan & Daly, James & Bierer, Barbara E., 2023. "Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabiano, Gianluca & Marcellusi, Andrea & Favato, Giampiero, 2021. "R versus D, from knowledge creation to value appropriation: Ownership of patents filed by European biotechnology founders," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Liu, Zhenfeng & Feng, Jian & Uden, Lorna, 2023. "Technology opportunity analysis using hierarchical semantic networks and dual link prediction," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Sile Wang & Xiaorui Su & Bowei Zhao & Pengwei Hu & Tao Bai & Lun Hu, 2023. "An Improved Graph Isomorphism Network for Accurate Prediction of Drug–Drug Interactions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Hou, Jianhua & Wang, Dongyi & Li, Jing, 2022. "A new method for measuring the originality of academic articles based on knowledge units in semantic networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    5. Fischer, Lennart & Losacker, Sebastian & Wydra, Sven, 2024. "National specialization and diversification in the bioeconomy: Insights from biobased technologies in chemical and pharmaceutical sectors," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Shiyun Wang & Jin Mao & Yujie Cao & Gang Li, 2022. "Integrated knowledge content in an interdisciplinary field: identification, classification, and application," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6581-6614, November.
    7. Niccolò Pancino & Yohann Perron & Pietro Bongini & Franco Scarselli, 2022. "Drug Side Effect Prediction with Deep Learning Molecular Embedding in a Graph-of-Graphs Domain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Rotolo, Daniele & Camerani, Roberto & Grassano, Nicola & Martin, Ben R., 2022. "Why do firms publish? A systematic literature review and a conceptual framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04340-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.