IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v13y2022i1d10.1038_s41467-022-30695-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Medical Segmentation Decathlon

Author

Listed:
  • Michela Antonelli

    (King’s College London)

  • Annika Reinke

    (German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
    German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
    University of Heidelberg)

  • Spyridon Bakas

    (University of Pennsylvania
    University of Pennsylvania
    University of Pennsylvania)

  • Keyvan Farahani

    (National Cancer Institute (NIH))

  • Annette Kopp-Schneider

    (German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ))

  • Bennett A. Landman

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Geert Litjens

    (Radboud Institute for Health Sciences)

  • Bjoern Menze

    (University of Zurich)

  • Olaf Ronneberger

    (DeepMind)

  • Ronald M. Summers

    (National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (NIH))

  • Bram Ginneken

    (Radboud Institute for Health Sciences)

  • Michel Bilello

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Patrick Bilic

    (Technische Universität München)

  • Patrick F. Christ

    (Technische Universität München)

  • Richard K. G. Do

    (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

  • Marc J. Gollub

    (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

  • Stephan H. Heckers

    (Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

  • Henkjan Huisman

    (Radboud Institute for Health Sciences)

  • William R. Jarnagin

    (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

  • Maureen K. McHugo

    (Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

  • Sandy Napel

    (Stanford University)

  • Jennifer S. Golia Pernicka

    (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

  • Kawal Rhode

    (King’s College London)

  • Catalina Tobon-Gomez

    (King’s College London)

  • Eugene Vorontsov

    (École Polytechnique de Montréal)

  • James A. Meakin

    (Radboud Institute for Health Sciences)

  • Sebastien Ourselin

    (King’s College London)

  • Manuel Wiesenfarth

    (German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ))

  • Pablo Arbeláez

    (Universidad de los Andes)

  • Byeonguk Bae

    (VUNO Inc.)

  • Sihong Chen

    (Tencent Jarvis Lab)

  • Laura Daza

    (Universidad de los Andes)

  • Jianjiang Feng

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Baochun He

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Fabian Isensee

    (German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ))

  • Yuanfeng Ji

    (Xiamen University)

  • Fucang Jia

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Ildoo Kim

    (Kakao Brain)

  • Klaus Maier-Hein

    (Cerebriu A/S
    Heidelberg University Hospital)

  • Dorit Merhof

    (RWTH Aachen University
    Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS)

  • Akshay Pai

    (Cerebriu A/S
    University of Copenhagen)

  • Beomhee Park

    (VUNO Inc.)

  • Mathias Perslev

    (University of Copenhagen)

  • Ramin Rezaiifar

    (MaaDoTaa.com)

  • Oliver Rippel

    (RWTH Aachen University)

  • Ignacio Sarasua

    (University Hospital)

  • Wei Shen

    (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)

  • Jaemin Son

    (VUNO Inc.)

  • Christian Wachinger

    (University Hospital)

  • Liansheng Wang

    (Xiamen University)

  • Yan Wang

    (East China Normal University)

  • Yingda Xia

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • Daguang Xu

    (NVIDIA)

  • Zhanwei Xu

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Yefeng Zheng

    (Tencent Jarvis Lab)

  • Amber L. Simpson

    (Queen’s University)

  • Lena Maier-Hein

    (German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
    German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
    University of Heidelberg
    University of Heidelberg)

  • M. Jorge Cardoso

    (King’s College London)

Abstract

International challenges have become the de facto standard for comparative assessment of image analysis algorithms. Although segmentation is the most widely investigated medical image processing task, the various challenges have been organized to focus only on specific clinical tasks. We organized the Medical Segmentation Decathlon (MSD)—a biomedical image analysis challenge, in which algorithms compete in a multitude of both tasks and modalities to investigate the hypothesis that a method capable of performing well on multiple tasks will generalize well to a previously unseen task and potentially outperform a custom-designed solution. MSD results confirmed this hypothesis, moreover, MSD winner continued generalizing well to a wide range of other clinical problems for the next two years. Three main conclusions can be drawn from this study: (1) state-of-the-art image segmentation algorithms generalize well when retrained on unseen tasks; (2) consistent algorithmic performance across multiple tasks is a strong surrogate of algorithmic generalizability; (3) the training of accurate AI segmentation models is now commoditized to scientists that are not versed in AI model training.

Suggested Citation

  • Michela Antonelli & Annika Reinke & Spyridon Bakas & Keyvan Farahani & Annette Kopp-Schneider & Bennett A. Landman & Geert Litjens & Bjoern Menze & Olaf Ronneberger & Ronald M. Summers & Bram Ginneken, 2022. "The Medical Segmentation Decathlon," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-30695-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30695-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-30695-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-022-30695-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lena Maier-Hein & Matthias Eisenmann & Annika Reinke & Sinan Onogur & Marko Stankovic & Patrick Scholz & Tal Arbel & Hrvoje Bogunovic & Andrew P. Bradley & Aaron Carass & Carolin Feldmann & Alejandro , 2018. "Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Shengxiao (Alex), 2023. "Revisiting the relationship between information and communication technologies and travel behavior: An investigation of older Americans," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Maclean, Johanna Catherine & Tello-Trillo, Sebastian & Webber, Douglas, 2023. "Losing insurance and psychiatric hospitalizations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 508-527.
    3. Jun Ma & Yuting He & Feifei Li & Lin Han & Chenyu You & Bo Wang, 2024. "Segment anything in medical images," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Emmons, Karen M. & Mendez, Samuel & Lee, Rebekka M. & Erani, Diana & Mascioli, Lynette & Abreu, Marlene & Adams, Susan & Daly, James & Bierer, Barbara E., 2023. "Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    5. Elizaveta Sivak & Paulina Pankowska & Adriënne Mendrik & Tom Emery & Javier Garcia-Bernardo & Seyit Höcük & Kasia Karpinska & Angelica Maineri & Joris Mulder & Malvina Nissim & Gert Stulp, 2024. "Combining the strengths of Dutch survey and register data in a data challenge to predict fertility (PreFer)," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1403-1431, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yashvardhan Jain & Leah L. Godwin & Sripad Joshi & Shriya Mandarapu & Trang Le & Cecilia Lindskog & Emma Lundberg & Katy Börner, 2023. "Segmenting functional tissue units across human organs using community-driven development of generalizable machine learning algorithms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-30695-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.