IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v260y2020ics0277953620303932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The double-edged sword of digital self-care: Physician perspectives from Northern Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Fiske, Amelia
  • Buyx, Alena
  • Prainsack, Barbara

Abstract

Increasingly, patients are expected to take initiative and care for themselves through practices of digital self-care: by generating data, by looking for people who can help them make sense of the information, and by being the main actors in disease prevention. Equipped with smart phones and other tools to collect data on various aspects of their bodies and lives from brain waves to activity to diet, patients are expected to prevent lifestyle diseases and diagnose their own medical problems, heralding an entirely new model of care within doctor-patient relationships. In this article we explore physician perspectives on how digital self-care practices are encountered, understood, and incorporated (or not) in the health care system. We carried out in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 15 doctors in Northern Germany in 2018 in order to explore how they included digital data in clinical decisions, how they understood practices of digital self-care, and how they saw these practices affect doctor-patient relationships. Our findings indicate notable frictions between narratives of ‘e-patients’ and digitally-empowered people in public media and scholarly literature on the one hand, and what doctors reportedly experience in their own practice on the other. We conclude that tech-forward ideas surrounding lay practices of medical emancipation do not ‘travel lightly’ across different contexts, but are taken up unevenly in and outside of the clinic. Moreover, the personal relationships through which digital self-care practices are undertaken remain central to the meaningful and safe application of new technologies and applications – something that often escapes debates over patient empowerment and digital technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiske, Amelia & Buyx, Alena & Prainsack, Barbara, 2020. "The double-edged sword of digital self-care: Physician perspectives from Northern Germany," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:260:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620303932
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953620303932
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Serena Barello & Guendalina Graffigna & Elena Vegni, 2012. "Patient Engagement as an Emerging Challenge for Healthcare Services: Mapping the Literature," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-7, October.
    2. Loick Menvielle & Anne-Françoise Audrain-Pontevia & William Menvielle, 2017. "The Digitization of Healthcare, New Challenges and Opportunities," Post-Print hal-02080020, HAL.
    3. Will, Catherine M. & Weiner, Kate, 2015. "The drugs don't sell: DIY heart health and the over-the-counter statin experience," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 280-288.
    4. Chris Till, 2014. "Exercise as Labour: Quantified Self and the Transformation of Exercise into Labour," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-17, August.
    5. DeFriese, Gordon H. & Woomert, Alison & Guild, Priscilla A. & Steckler, Allan B. & Konrad, Thomas R., 1989. "From activated patient to pacified activist: A study of the self-care movement in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 195-204, January.
    6. Dean, Kathryn, 1989. "Self-care components of lifestyles: The importance of gender, attitudes and the social situation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 137-152, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shachar, Leeor, 2022. "“You become a slightly better doctor”: Doctors adopting integrated medical expertise through interactions with E-patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    2. Torenholt, Rikke & Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine, 2022. "‘Is this something I should be worried about?’: A study of nurses' recontextualisation work when making clinical decisions based on patient reported outcome data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bussing, Regina & E Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka & Williamson, Pamela & Gary, Faye A. & Wilson Garvan, Cynthia, 2006. "What "Dr. Mom" ordered: A community-based exploratory study of parental self-care responses to children's ADHD symptoms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 871-882, August.
    2. Alessia Bertolazzi & Katarzyna Marzęda-Młynarska & Justyna Kięczkowska & Maria Letizia Zanier, 2024. "Datafication of Care: Security and Privacy Issues with Health Technology for People with Diabetes," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, August.
    3. Thomas Abel & Esther Walter & Steffen Niemann & Rolf Weitkunat, 1999. "The Berne-Munich Lifestyle Panel," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 44(3), pages 91-106, May.
    4. Estelle Augé & Nicolas Sirven, 2024. "The Impact of a Social Programme on the Healthcare Consumption of Elderly Self-Employed Workers in France," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 542, pages 79-98.
    5. Lorenz, Max & Reinhard, Patrick & Spring, Thomas, 2021. "Digitalization in MedTech: Understanding the Impact on Total Knee Arthroplasty," Working Paper Series in Health Economics, Management and Policy 2021-02, University of St.Gallen, School of Medicine, Chair of Health Economics, Policy and Management.
    6. Evgeniya G. Nim, 2019. "Digital Self-Tracking Among Russian Students: Practices And Discourses," HSE Working papers WP BRP 91/SOC/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Danelski, Alexa & Gersch, Martin & Erler, Christina, 2023. "Whitepaper zum Projekt "BloG³ - Blockchainbasiertes Gesundheitsdatenmanagement für gesamtheitliche Gesundheitsprofile". Delphi-Analyse: Szenarien und Geschäftsmodelle," Discussion Papers 2023/8, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    8. Louise K Wiles & Debra Kay & Julie A Luker & Anthea Worley & Jane Austin & Allan Ball & Alan Bevan & Michael Cousins & Sarah Dalton & Ellie Hodges & Lidia Horvat & Ellen Kerrins & Julie Marker & Miche, 2022. "Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Elena Druică & Cristian Băicuș & Rodica Ianole-Călin & Ronald Fischer, 2021. "Information or Habit: What Health Policy Makers Should Know about the Drivers of Self-Medication among Romanians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Marent, Benjamin & Henwood, Flis & Darking, Mary, 2018. "Ambivalence in digital health: Co-designing an mHealth platform for HIV care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 133-141.
    11. Roberto Moro-Visconti, 2021. "Networking Digital Platforms and Healthcare Project Finance Bankability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Gia ZOIDZE & George ABUSELIDZE, 2023. "Importance of healthcare economy on sustainable development of the country," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 4(1), pages 60-70, October.
    13. Thomas Calvard, 2019. "Integrating Social Scientific Perspectives on the Quantified Employee Self," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Deborah Lupton, 2014. "Apps as Artefacts: Towards a Critical Perspective on Mobile Health and Medical Apps," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Lucas, Henry, 2015. "New technology and illness self-management: Potential relevance for resource-poor populations in Asia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 145-153.
    16. Gian Maria Campedelli, 2021. "Where are we? Using Scopus to map the literature at the intersection between artificial intelligence and research on crime," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 503-530, November.
    17. Gallan, Andrew S. & Helkkula, Anu & McConnell, William R., 2024. "Why did this happen to me? Causal attributions of illness and cultural health capital," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    18. Alexander Gleiss & Marco Kohlhagen & Key Pousttchi, 2021. "An apple a day – how the platform economy impacts value creation in the healthcare market," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 849-876, December.
    19. Phoenix Mo & W. Winnie, 2010. "The Influence of Health Promoting Practices on the Quality of Life of Community Adults in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 503-517, February.
    20. Petrakaki, Dimitra & Hilberg, Eva & Waring, Justin, 2018. "Between empowerment and self-discipline: Governing patients' conduct through technological self-care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 146-153.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:260:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620303932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.