IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v358y2024ics0277953624007135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Precision medicine in primary care: How GPs envision “old” and “new” forms of personalization

Author

Listed:
  • Pot, Mirjam
  • Spalletta, Olivia
  • Green, Sara

Abstract

Visions of precision or personalized medicine (PM) are gaining currency around the globe. While the potential of PM in specialist medicine has been in focus, primary care is also considered to be a fruitful area for the application of PM. “Low-tech” forms of personalization and attention to individual patients are already central features of primary care practice, and primary care thus constitutes an area in which “old” and “new” forms of personalization (may) come together. Against this backdrop, we explore general practitioners' (GPs) views on PM and how they envision the future of personalization in primary care. We draw on 45 qualitative interviews with GPs from Austria, Denmark, and the United States. Along the lines of major “promises” of PM—tailoring treatment decisions, improving disease prevention, empowering patients—we show that in some areas GPs consider PM to be a continuation or extension of existing practices of personalization, while in other cases, GPs envision that PM may negatively disrupt current forms of personalization in primary care. We suggest that this ambivalent stance towards PM can be understood through the lens of GPs’ views on core values and practices of primary care.

Suggested Citation

  • Pot, Mirjam & Spalletta, Olivia & Green, Sara, 2024. "Precision medicine in primary care: How GPs envision “old” and “new” forms of personalization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:358:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624007135
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624007135
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fiske, Amelia & Buyx, Alena & Prainsack, Barbara, 2020. "The double-edged sword of digital self-care: Physician perspectives from Northern Germany," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    2. Tutton, Richard, 2012. "Personalizing medicine: Futures present and past," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(10), pages 1721-1728.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gagliardi, Dimitri & Ramlogan, Ronnie & Navarra, Pierluigi & Dello Russo, Cinzia, 2018. "Diffusion of complementary evolving pharmaceutical innovations: The case of Abacavir and its pharmacogenetic companion diagnostic in Italy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 223-233.
    2. Burau, Viola & Nissen, Nina & Terkildsen, Morten Deleuran & Væggemose, Ulla, 2021. "Personalised medicine and the state: A political discourse analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 122-129.
    3. Deml, Michael J. & Notter, Julia & Kliem, Paulina & Buhl, Andrea & Huber, Benedikt M. & Pfeiffer, Constanze & Burton-Jeangros, Claudine & Tarr, Philip E., 2019. "“We treat humans, not herds!”: A qualitative study of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers’ individualized approaches to vaccination in Switzerland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    4. MacFife, Bex, 2022. "“There is no standard vulva”: Sanitized vs. contextualized instruction of hands-on medical skills," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    5. Weinhold, Ines & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2018. "Rural - urban differences in determinants of patient satisfaction with primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 76-85.
    6. Shachar, Leeor, 2022. "“You become a slightly better doctor”: Doctors adopting integrated medical expertise through interactions with E-patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    7. Torenholt, Rikke & Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine, 2022. "‘Is this something I should be worried about?’: A study of nurses' recontextualisation work when making clinical decisions based on patient reported outcome data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:358:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624007135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.