IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v126y2015icp36-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of using computer decision-support software in primary care nurse-led telephone triage: Interactional dilemmas and conversational consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Murdoch, Jamie
  • Barnes, Rebecca
  • Pooler, Jillian
  • Lattimer, Valerie
  • Fletcher, Emily
  • Campbell, John L.

Abstract

Telephone triage represents one strategy to manage demand for face-to-face GP appointments in primary care. Although computer decision-support software (CDSS) is increasingly used by nurses to triage patients, little is understood about how interaction is organized in this setting. Specifically any interactional dilemmas this computer-mediated setting invokes; and how these may be consequential for communication with patients. Using conversation analytic methods we undertook a multi-modal analysis of 22 audio-recorded telephone triage nurse–caller interactions from one GP practice in England, including 10 video-recordings of nurses' use of CDSS during triage. We draw on Goffman's theoretical notion of participation frameworks to make sense of these interactions, presenting ‘telling cases’ of interactional dilemmas nurses faced in meeting patient's needs and accurately documenting the patient's condition within the CDSS. Our findings highlight troubles in the ‘interactional workability’ of telephone triage exposing difficulties faced in aligning the proximal and wider distal context that structures CDSS-mediated interactions. Patients present with diverse symptoms, understanding of triage consultations, and communication skills which nurses need to negotiate turn-by-turn with CDSS requirements. Nurses therefore need to have sophisticated communication, technological and clinical skills to ensure patients' presenting problems are accurately captured within the CDSS to determine safe triage outcomes. Dilemmas around how nurses manage and record information, and the issues of professional accountability that may ensue, raise questions about the impact of CDSS and its use in supporting nurses to deliver safe and effective patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Murdoch, Jamie & Barnes, Rebecca & Pooler, Jillian & Lattimer, Valerie & Fletcher, Emily & Campbell, John L., 2015. "The impact of using computer decision-support software in primary care nurse-led telephone triage: Interactional dilemmas and conversational consequences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 36-47.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:126:y:2015:i:c:p:36-47
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953614008107
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stewart, Moira A., 1984. "What is a successful doctor-patient interview? a study of interactions and outcomes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 167-175, January.
    2. Pappas, Yannis & Seale, Clive, 2009. "The opening phase of telemedicine consultations: An analysis of interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1229-1237, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Loes T. Wouters & Dorien L. Zwart & Daphne C. Erkelens & Marlies Huijsmans & Arno W. Hoes & Roger A. Damoiseaux & Frans H. Rutten & Esther de Groot, 2020. "Tinkering and overruling the computer decision support system: Working strategies of telephone triage nurses who assess the urgency of callers suspected of having an acute cardiac event," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1175-1186, April.
    2. Stefanie Lopriore & Amanda LeCouteur & Katie Ekberg & Stuart Ekberg, 2019. "“You'll have to be my eyes and ears”: A conversation analytic study of physical examination on a health helpline," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 330-339, January.
    3. Smailhodzic, Edin & Boonstra, Albert & Langley, David J., 2021. "Social media enabled interactions in healthcare: Towards a taxonomy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    4. Elenor Kaminsky & Marta Röing & Annica Björkman & Inger K. Holmström, 2017. "Telephone nursing in Sweden: A narrative literature review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 278-286, September.
    5. Murdoch, Jamie & Salter, Charlotte & Ford, John & Lenaghan, Elizabeth & Shiner, Alice & Steel, Nicholas, 2020. "The “unknown territory” of goal-setting: Negotiating a novel interactional activity within primary care doctor-patient consultations for patients with multiple chronic conditions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    6. Inger K. Holmström & Susan Gustafsson & Josefin Wesström & Karin Skoglund, 2019. "Telephone nurses’ use of a decision support system: An observational study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 501-507, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beach, Wayne A. & Easter, David W. & Good, Jeffrey S. & Pigeron, Elisa, 2005. "Disclosing and responding to cancer "fears" during oncology interviews," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 893-910, February.
    2. Ginetta Salvalaggio & Robert McKim & Marliss Taylor & T. Cameron Wild, 2013. "Patient–Provider Rapport in the Health Care of People Who Inject Drugs," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    3. Andreassen, Hege K. & Dyb, Kari & May, Carl R. & Pope, Catherine J. & Warth, Line L., 2018. "Digitized patient–provider interaction: How does it matter? A qualitative meta-synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 36-44.
    4. Sebastian Sołomacha & Paweł Sowa & Łukasz Kiszkiel & Piotr Paweł Laskowski & Maciej Alimowski & Łukasz Szczerbiński & Andrzej Szpak & Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska & Karol Kamiński, 2022. "Patient’s Perspective of Telemedicine in Poland—A Two-Year Pandemic Picture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Augustine Adomah-Afari & Theophilus Maloreh-Nyamekye, 2019. "Enhancing Patient Satisfaction - Relationship Marketing Strategies of Two Specialist Hospitals in Accra, Ghana," International Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(2), pages 213-231, June.
    6. Timmermans, Stefan & Tietbohl, Caroline, 2018. "Fifty years of sociological leadership at Social Science and Medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 209-215.
    7. Zandbelt, Linda C. & Smets, Ellen M.A. & Oort, Frans J. & de Haes, Hanneke C.J.M., 2005. "Coding patient-centred behaviour in the medical encounter," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 661-671, August.
    8. Fraser, Suzanne & Fomiatti, Renae & Moore, David & Seear, Kate & Aitken, Campbell, 2020. "Is another relationship possible? Connoisseurship and the doctor–patient relationship for men who consume performance and image-enhancing drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    9. Maria E. Suarez-Almazor & Barbara Conner-Spady & Chris J. Kendall & Anthony S. Russell & Kenneth Skeith, 2001. "Lack of Congruence in the Ratings of Patients’ Health Status by Patients and Their Physicians," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 21(2), pages 113-121, April.
    10. Pappas Yannis & Vseteckova Jitka, 2019. "Research, Evaluation and Sustainability: Reflecting on 15 Years of Experience in Ehealth," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 19(2), pages 14212-14214, July.
    11. Zandbelt, Linda C. & Smets, Ellen M.A. & Oort, Frans J. & Godfried, Mieke H. & de Haes, Hanneke C.J.M., 2006. "Determinants of physicians' patient-centred behaviour in the medical specialist encounter," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 899-910, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:126:y:2015:i:c:p:36-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.