IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v19y1984i2p167-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is a successful doctor-patient interview? a study of interactions and outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Stewart, Moira A.

Abstract

The discipline of family medicine has espoused a patient-centered model of the doctor-patient interaction. Patient-centered interactions are those in which the patient's point of view is actively sought by the physician. This implies that the physician behaves in a manner that facilities the patient's expressing himself and that, for his part, the patient speaks openly and asks questions. The present exploratory study was undertaken to assess whether patient-centered interviews are related to positive outcomes. The study was conducted in 24 family physicians' offices where 140 doctor-patient interactions were audiotaped. Patients with both acute and chronic illnesses were included. The taped interactions were analysed using Bales Interaction Process Analysis. Ten days after the audiotaped visit the patients were interviewed in their home in order to assess their satisfaction with care, their reported compliance and to conduct a pill count. Bivariate analysis indicated that interviews in which physicians demonstrated a high frequency of patient-centered behaviour were related to significantly higher reported compliance and close to significantly better pill counts and satisfaction. Furthermore, in most instances, when the patient and physician scores were considered in combination, there was evidence that the physician's behaviour, particularly that sort of behaviour which initiated a discussion such as an explicit request for the patient's opinion, had more impact upon outcome than did the patient behaviour. The study suggests the importance in the setting of family practice of a patient-centred approach, one which is similar to models such as the negotiated approach to patienthood, described by psychiatrists. Two directions for future research are suggested. Firstly, analysis of the sequence of behaviours in the interactions must be undertaken to assess the impact of timing and initiation of behaviours upon outcomes. Secondly, although the validity of the attitudes and behaviours chosen as outcome measures will be acceptable to many readers, the next step is for future studies to assess the impact of a patient-centred approach upon the ultimate outcome, patient's health.

Suggested Citation

  • Stewart, Moira A., 1984. "What is a successful doctor-patient interview? a study of interactions and outcomes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 167-175, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:2:p:167-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90284-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Augustine Adomah-Afari & Theophilus Maloreh-Nyamekye, 2019. "Enhancing Patient Satisfaction - Relationship Marketing Strategies of Two Specialist Hospitals in Accra, Ghana," International Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(2), pages 213-231, June.
    2. Beach, Wayne A. & Easter, David W. & Good, Jeffrey S. & Pigeron, Elisa, 2005. "Disclosing and responding to cancer "fears" during oncology interviews," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 893-910, February.
    3. Maria E. Suarez-Almazor & Barbara Conner-Spady & Chris J. Kendall & Anthony S. Russell & Kenneth Skeith, 2001. "Lack of Congruence in the Ratings of Patients’ Health Status by Patients and Their Physicians," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 21(2), pages 113-121, April.
    4. Zandbelt, Linda C. & Smets, Ellen M.A. & Oort, Frans J. & Godfried, Mieke H. & de Haes, Hanneke C.J.M., 2006. "Determinants of physicians' patient-centred behaviour in the medical specialist encounter," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 899-910, August.
    5. Fraser, Suzanne & Fomiatti, Renae & Moore, David & Seear, Kate & Aitken, Campbell, 2020. "Is another relationship possible? Connoisseurship and the doctor–patient relationship for men who consume performance and image-enhancing drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    6. Timmermans, Stefan & Tietbohl, Caroline, 2018. "Fifty years of sociological leadership at Social Science and Medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 209-215.
    7. Ginetta Salvalaggio & Robert McKim & Marliss Taylor & T. Cameron Wild, 2013. "Patient–Provider Rapport in the Health Care of People Who Inject Drugs," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    8. Zandbelt, Linda C. & Smets, Ellen M.A. & Oort, Frans J. & de Haes, Hanneke C.J.M., 2005. "Coding patient-centred behaviour in the medical encounter," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 661-671, August.
    9. Murdoch, Jamie & Barnes, Rebecca & Pooler, Jillian & Lattimer, Valerie & Fletcher, Emily & Campbell, John L., 2015. "The impact of using computer decision-support software in primary care nurse-led telephone triage: Interactional dilemmas and conversational consequences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 36-47.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:2:p:167-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.