IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i1-2p330-339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“You'll have to be my eyes and ears”: A conversation analytic study of physical examination on a health helpline

Author

Listed:
  • Stefanie Lopriore
  • Amanda LeCouteur
  • Katie Ekberg
  • Stuart Ekberg

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the accomplishment of physical examination on a health helpline. By focusing on the ways in which callers are asked to examine themselves and report information to nurses, we aim to provide insight into how physical examination at a distance is achieved. Background Physical examination is a routine feature of healthcare encounters. In face‐to‐face settings, patients are subject to professional scrutiny through talk, touch and observation. Health professionals working on helplines face challenges in assessing signs of illness when they do not have physical access to patients. Design and Methods Conversation analysis was used to explore sequences of interaction between nurses and callers that involved physical examination. Analysis Analysis examined how physical examination was routinely accomplished in a helpline environment. Nurses typically guided callers in self‐examination by drawing on gross categorisations that required reporting of large‐scale characteristics of symptoms (e.g., whether a body part looked “normal”). Physical examination was also regularly accomplished by nurses through two‐component speaking turns: a prefacing component that involved instructions about self‐examination; followed by a second component that included an information‐soliciting question. These practices resulted in callers successfully accomplishing physical examination, despite their lack of professional medical knowledge. Conclusions This study identifies the communicative practices used by nurses to accomplish physical examination in helpline calls. Such practices involved asking questions that sought general, rather than specific, information and the prefacing of questions with simple instructions on how to undertake self‐examination. Relevance to clinical practice Previous research indicates that physical examination in telehealth can be challenging, particularly in environments where clinicians need patients to examine themselves. This study identifies how nurses on a helpline manage this challenge. The findings highlight ways in which nurses can recruit patients to undertake tasks that would typically be undertaken by clinicians in physically co‐present consultations.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanie Lopriore & Amanda LeCouteur & Katie Ekberg & Stuart Ekberg, 2019. "“You'll have to be my eyes and ears”: A conversation analytic study of physical examination on a health helpline," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 330-339, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:1-2:p:330-339
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14638
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murdoch, Jamie & Barnes, Rebecca & Pooler, Jillian & Lattimer, Valerie & Fletcher, Emily & Campbell, John L., 2015. "The impact of using computer decision-support software in primary care nurse-led telephone triage: Interactional dilemmas and conversational consequences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 36-47.
    2. Heritage, John & Stivers, Tanya, 1999. "Online commentary in acute medical visits: a method of shaping patient expectations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(11), pages 1501-1517, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chatwin, John & Kennedy, Anne & Firth, Adam & Povey, Andrew & Rogers, Anne & Sanders, Caroline, 2014. "How potentially serious symptom changes are talked about and managed in COPD clinical review consultations: A micro-analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 120-136.
    2. Tate, Alexandra, 2020. "Invoking death: How oncologists discuss a deadly outcome," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    3. Murdoch, Jamie & Salter, Charlotte & Ford, John & Lenaghan, Elizabeth & Shiner, Alice & Steel, Nicholas, 2020. "The “unknown territory” of goal-setting: Negotiating a novel interactional activity within primary care doctor-patient consultations for patients with multiple chronic conditions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Gibson, Mark & Neil Jenkings, K. & Wilson, Rob & Purves, Ian, 2006. "Verbal prescribing in general practice consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 1684-1698, September.
    5. White, Anne Elizabeth Clark, 2020. "When and how do surgeons initiate noticings of additional concerns?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    6. Zhang, Shuai & Cheng, Meili & Ma, Wen & Liu, Huashui & Zhao, Chunjuan, 2023. "Companion responses to diagnosis in Chinese outpatient clinical interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    7. Maynard, Douglas W., 2006. ""Does it mean I'm gonna die?": On meaning assessment in the delivery of diagnostic news," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(8), pages 1902-1916, April.
    8. Broom, Alex & Broom, Jennifer & Kirby, Emma, 2014. "Cultures of resistance? A Bourdieusian analysis of doctors' antibiotic prescribing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 81-88.
    9. Elenor Kaminsky & Marta Röing & Annica Björkman & Inger K. Holmström, 2017. "Telephone nursing in Sweden: A narrative literature review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 278-286, September.
    10. Montenegro, Roberto E. & Dori-Hacohen, Gonen, 2020. "Morality in sugar talk: Presenting blood glucose levels in routine diabetes medical visits," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    11. Dooley, Jemima & Barnes, Dr Rebecca, 2022. "Negotiating ‘the problem’ in GP home visits to people with dementia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    12. Inger K. Holmström & Susan Gustafsson & Josefin Wesström & Karin Skoglund, 2019. "Telephone nurses’ use of a decision support system: An observational study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 501-507, December.
    13. Loes T. Wouters & Dorien L. Zwart & Daphne C. Erkelens & Marlies Huijsmans & Arno W. Hoes & Roger A. Damoiseaux & Frans H. Rutten & Esther de Groot, 2020. "Tinkering and overruling the computer decision support system: Working strategies of telephone triage nurses who assess the urgency of callers suspected of having an acute cardiac event," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1175-1186, April.
    14. Zhang, Xi & Wei, Xin & Zhang, Te & Tan, Yahe & Xu, Dongming & Ordóñez de Pablos, Patricia, 2023. "How platform-based internet hospital innovation affects doctors’ active stress coping efforts: The conservation of resource theory perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    15. Turowetz, Jason, 2022. "Interaction order and the labeling of disorder: How parents mobilize personal knowledge in the clinic to resist medicalization of their children's behavior," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    16. Stivers, Tanya & Timmermans, Stefan, 2021. "Arriving at no: Patient pressure to prescribe antibiotics and physicians’ responses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    17. Smailhodzic, Edin & Boonstra, Albert & Langley, David J., 2021. "Social media enabled interactions in healthcare: Towards a taxonomy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    18. Bridges, Susan & Drew, Paul & Zayts, Olga & McGrath, Colman & Yiu, Cynthia K.Y. & Wong, H.M. & Au, T.K.F., 2015. "Interpreter-mediated dentistry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 197-207.
    19. Lindström, Anna K.B. & Tängdén, Thomas, 2022. "Introducing the C-reactive protein point-of-care test: A conversation analytic study of primary care consultations for respiratory tract infection," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    20. Seale, Clive & Chaplin, Robert & Lelliott, Paul & Quirk, Alan, 2007. "Antipsychotic medication, sedation and mental clouding: An observational study of psychiatric consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 698-711, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:1-2:p:330-339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.