IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v95y2024ics0038012124002106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new approach for assessing the probability of museum opening choices and its spatial continuity

Author

Listed:
  • Cappello, Claudia
  • De Iaco, Sandra
  • Maggio, Sabrina

Abstract

In the literature, several approaches and methods were applied for studying the visitors’ profile or the managerial performance and economic efficiency of the museums; however, none of them investigated the museums opening decisions. To this aim an innovative approach which combines multilevel multinomial ordered models and spatial correlation models, is introduced and some advances in logit data geostatistical modeling is proposed together with an extended form of regression kriging, called multilevel logit kriging. Thus, the variation of the probability of the museums opening decisions both at regional and provincial levels for some peculiar museums characteristics, as well as the effect of some specific regional/provincial key factors which might influence their regular/non regular opening are modeled, also with respect to different types of institution (private/public).

Suggested Citation

  • Cappello, Claudia & De Iaco, Sandra & Maggio, Sabrina, 2024. "A new approach for assessing the probability of museum opening choices and its spatial continuity," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:95:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124002106
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2024.102011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124002106
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2024.102011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorenzo Mizzau & Fabrizio Montanari, 2008. "Cultural districts and the challenge of authenticity: the case of Piedmont, Italy -super-†," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(5), pages 651-673, September.
    2. Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe‐Hesketh, 2009. "Prediction in multilevel generalized linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(3), pages 659-687, June.
    3. Sandra De Iaco & Sabrina Maggio, 2022. "Using multilevel models to evaluate the attitude of separate waste collection in young people," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 80(1), pages 77-95, April.
    4. Sandra De Iaco & Sabrina Maggio & Donato Posa, 2019. "A Multilevel Multinomial Model for the Dynamics of Graduates Employment in Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 149-168, November.
    5. Leonardo Grilli & Carla Rampichini, 2015. "Specification of random effects in multilevel models: a review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 967-976, May.
    6. Bercedis Peterson & Frank E. Harrell, 1990. "Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Response Variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 39(2), pages 205-217, June.
    7. Richard Williams, 2006. "Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 6(1), pages 58-82, March.
    8. Alan Agresti & Ranjini Natarajan, 2001. "Modeling Clustered Ordered Categorical Data: A Survey," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 69(3), pages 345-371, December.
    9. Guccio, Calogero & Martorana, Marco & Mazza, Isidoro & Pignataro, Giacomo & Rizzo, Ilde, 2020. "An analysis of the managerial performance of Italian museums using a generalised conditional efficiency model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. María José Barrio-Tellado & Luis César Herrero-Prieto, 2019. "Modelling museum efficiency in producing inter-reliant outputs," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 43(3), pages 485-512, September.
    11. Aleksandra Wiśniewska & Wiktor Budziński & Mikołaj Czajkowski, 2020. "An economic valuation of access to cultural institutions: museums, theatres, and cinemas," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(4), pages 563-587, December.
    12. Silvia Fedeli & Michele Santoni, 2006. "The Government's Choice of Bureaucratic Organisation: An Application to Italian State Museums," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 30(1), pages 41-72, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gómez-Zapata, Jonathan Daniel & Del Barrio-Tellado, María José & Espinosa-Casero, Fátima & Herrero-Prieto, Luis César, 2024. "I like participatory museums but, how much? Embedding demand-side value in assessing strategies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabrina Maggio & Sandra Iaco & Claudia Cappello, 2024. "Multilevel modeling for investigating the probability of digital innovation in museums," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(3), pages 1737-1764, November.
    2. Hanna Dudek & Joanna Landmesser, 2012. "Income satisfaction and relative deprivation," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 13(2), pages 321-334, June.
    3. Costanza Nosi & Antonella D’Agostino & Margherita Pagliuca & Carlo Alberto Pratesi, 2017. "Securing Retirement at a Young Age. Exploring the Intention to Buy Longevity Annuities through an Extended Version of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Angelo Rampinelli & Juan Felipe Calderón & Carola A. Blazquez & Karen Sauer-Brand & Nicolás Hamann & José Ignacio Nazif-Munoz, 2022. "Investigating the Risk Factors Associated with Injury Severity in Pedestrian Crashes in Santiago, Chile," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Guan, Lijun & Zhang, Yan & Jin, Shaosheng & Zhou, Lin, 2021. "Understanding the low use rate of food nutrition information in China," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(5), April.
    6. Calogero Guccio & Domenico Lisi & Marco Ferdinando Martorana & Giacomo Pignataro, 2020. "Incorporating quality in the efficiency assessment of hospitals using a generalized directional distance function approach," Working papers 96, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    7. Tommaso Agasisti & Sergio Longobardi & Vincenzo Prete & Felice Russo, 2018. "Multidimensional poverty measures for analysing educational poverty in European countries," Working papers 73, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    8. Bertsch, Valentin & Hyland, Marie & Mahony, Michael, 2017. "What drives people's opinions of electricity infrastructure? Empirical evidence from Ireland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 472-497.
    9. Andrew S. Fullerton & Jun Xu, 2018. "Constrained and Unconstrained Partial Adjacent Category Logit Models for Ordinal Response Variables," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 47(2), pages 169-206, March.
    10. Isphording, Ingo E. & Otten, Sebastian, 2014. "Linguistic barriers in the destination language acquisition of immigrants," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 30-50.
    11. Frondel, Manuel & Simora, Michael & Sommer, Stephan, 2017. "Risk Perception of Climate Change: Empirical Evidence for Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 173-183.
    12. Andor, Mark A. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Sommer, Stephan, 2018. "Climate Change, Population Ageing and Public Spending: Evidence on Individual Preferences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 173-183.
    13. D'Alberto, R. & Targetti, S. & Schaller, L. & Bartolini, F. & Eichhorn, T. & Haltia, E. & Harmanny, K. & Le Gloux, F. & Nikolov, D. & Runge, T. & Vergamini, D. & Viaggi, D., 2024. "A European perspective on acceptability of innovative agri-environment-climate contract solutions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    14. Ó Ceallaigh, Diarmaid & Timmons, Shane & Robertson, Deirdre & Lunn, Pete, 2024. "Childhood gambling experiences and adult problem gambling," Papers WP780, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    15. Meng, Tianguang & Su, Zheng, 2021. "When top-down meets bottom-up: Local officials and selective responsiveness within fiscal policymaking in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    16. Hyland, Marie & Bertsch, Valentin, 2018. "The Role of Community Involvement Mechanisms in Reducing Resistance to Energy Infrastructure Development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 447-474.
    17. Middela, Mounisai Siddartha & Ramadurai, Gitakrishnan, 2024. "Modelling urban freight generation using linear regression and proportional odds logit models," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 145-153.
    18. Juan Gabriel Brida & Chiara Dalle Nogare & Raffaele Scuderi, 2017. "Learning at the museum," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(2), pages 281-294, March.
    19. Cal J Halvorsen & Yu-Chih Chen, 2019. "The diversity of interest in later-life entrepreneurship: Results from a nationally representative survey of Americans aged 50 to 70," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
    20. He, Sylvia Y. & Kuo, Yong-Hong & Sun, Ka Kit, 2022. "The spatial planning of public electric vehicle charging infrastructure in a high-density city using a contextualised location-allocation model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 21-44.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:95:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124002106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.