IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v92y2024ics0038012124000259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An optimization approach to improve equitable access to local parks

Author

Listed:
  • Young, Anisa
  • Tucker, Emily L.
  • Fernandez, Mariela
  • White, David
  • Brookover, Robert
  • Harris, Brandon

Abstract

Local parks are public resources that promote human and environmental welfare. Unfortunately, park inequities are commonplace as historically marginalized groups may have insufficient access. Platforms exist to identify the geographical areas that would benefit from future park improvements. However, these platforms do not optimize decisions nor include key features, such as budget and infrastructure, that are relevant to park location decisions. To support recreational and government agencies in addressing inequities in the distribution and quality of parks, we propose a mixed-integer program that minimizes insufficient access, defined as weighted deviations across multiple categories (distance, capacity, and environmental features). We consider an equity-focused min-max objective and an overall objective to minimize total weighted deviations. We apply the model to a case study of Asheville, North Carolina. We conduct extensive data collection to parameterize the model. In policy analyses, we consider the effects of available budget, planning horizons, strategic demographic priorities, and thresholds of access. The model reflects user-defined criteria and goals, and the results suggest that the framework may be generalizable to other cities. This study serves as a step in the development and incorporation of mathematical modeling to achieve social goals within the recreational setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Young, Anisa & Tucker, Emily L. & Fernandez, Mariela & White, David & Brookover, Robert & Harris, Brandon, 2024. "An optimization approach to improve equitable access to local parks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000259
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2024.101826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124000259
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabel Correia & M. Captivo, 2003. "A Lagrangean Heuristic for a Modular Capacitated Location Problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 141-161, September.
    2. Lin, Cheng-Chang & Lin, Chuan-Chih, 2018. "The p-center flow-refueling facility location problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 124-142.
    3. Alem, Douglas & Bonilla-Londono, Hector F. & Barbosa-Povoa, Ana Paula & Relvas, Susana & Ferreira, Deisemara & Moreno, Alfredo, 2021. "Building disaster preparedness and response capacity in humanitarian supply chains using the Social Vulnerability Index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(1), pages 250-275.
    4. Billionnet, Alain, 2013. "Mathematical optimization ideas for biodiversity conservation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(3), pages 514-534.
    5. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Fallah, Samira & Ruiz, Rubén & Hosseini, Sara & Asgari, Nasrin, 2019. "OR models in urban service facility location: A critical review of applications and future developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 1-27.
    6. Kent D. Messer & Maik Kecinski & Xing Tang & Robert H. Hirsch IV, 2016. "Multiple-Knapsack Optimization in Land Conservation: Results from the First Cost-effective Conservation Program in the United States," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 92(1), pages 117-130.
    7. Álvarez-Miranda, Eduardo & Goycoolea, Marcos & Ljubić, Ivana & Sinnl, Markus, 2021. "The Generalized Reserve Set Covering Problem with Connectivity and Buffer Requirements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 1013-1029.
    8. Sarah A. Costigan & Jenny Veitch & David Crawford & Alison Carver & Anna Timperio, 2017. "A Cross-Sectional Investigation of the Importance of Park Features for Promoting Regular Physical Activity in Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-10, November.
    9. Zhang, Yue & Atkins, Derek, 2019. "Medical facility network design: User-choice and system-optimal models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 305-319.
    10. Mark S. Daskin & Kayse Lee Maass, 2015. "The p-Median Problem," Springer Books, in: Gilbert Laporte & Stefan Nickel & Francisco Saldanha da Gama (ed.), Location Science, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 21-45, Springer.
    11. Gabriel, Steven A. & Faria, Jose A. & Moglen, Glenn E., 2006. "A multiobjective optimization approach to smart growth in land development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 212-248, September.
    12. Marsh, Michael T. & Schilling, David A., 1994. "Equity measurement in facility location analysis: A review and framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Owen, Susan Hesse & Daskin, Mark S., 1998. "Strategic facility location: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 423-447, December.
    14. Jorge A. Sefair & Adriana Molano & Andrés L. Medaglia & Olga L. Sarmiento, 2012. "Locating Neighborhood Parks with a Lexicographic Multiobjective Optimization Method," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michael P. Johnson (ed.), Community-Based Operations Research, chapter 0, pages 143-171, Springer.
    15. Melo, M.T. & Nickel, S. & Saldanha-da-Gama, F., 2009. "Facility location and supply chain management - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 401-412, July.
    16. Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca S. & Wilen, James E., 2012. "Optimal spatial control of biological invasions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 260-270.
    17. Mark S. Daskin & Emily L. Tucker, 2018. "The trade-off between the median and range of assigned demand in facility location models," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 97-119, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanjay Dominik Jena & Jean-François Cordeau & Bernard Gendron, 2015. "Dynamic Facility Location with Generalized Modular Capacities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 484-499, August.
    2. Šárka Štádlerová & Sanjay Dominik Jena & Peter Schütz, 2023. "Using Lagrangian relaxation to locate hydrogen production facilities under uncertain demand: a case study from Norway," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-32, December.
    3. Mejía, Gonzalo & Aránguiz, Raúl & Espejo-Díaz, Julián Alberto & Granados-Rivera, Daniela & Mejía-Argueta, Christopher, 2023. "Can street markets be a sustainable strategy to mitigate food insecurity in emerging countries? Insights from a competitive facility location model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Sanjay Jena & Jean-François Cordeau & Bernard Gendron, 2015. "Modeling and solving a logging camp location problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 232(1), pages 151-177, September.
    5. Jesús Sánchez-Oro & Ana D. López-Sánchez & Anna Martínez-Gavara & Alfredo G. Hernández-Díaz & Abraham Duarte, 2021. "A Hybrid Strategic Oscillation with Path Relinking Algorithm for the Multiobjective k -Balanced Center Location Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Park, Junseok & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2023. "A facility location problem in a mixed duopoly on networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Silva, Allyson & Aloise, Daniel & Coelho, Leandro C. & Rocha, Caroline, 2021. "Heuristics for the dynamic facility location problem with modular capacities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 435-452.
    8. Becker, Tristan & Lier, Stefan & Werners, Brigitte, 2019. "Value of modular production concepts in future chemical industry production networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 957-970.
    9. Xiang Li & Tianyu Zhang & Liang Wang & Hongguang Ma & Xiande Zhao, 2022. "A minimax regret model for the leader–follower facility location problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(2), pages 861-882, February.
    10. Sauvey, Christophe & Melo, Teresa & Correia, Isabel, 2019. "Two-phase heuristics for a multi-period capacitated facility location problem with service-differentiated customers," Technical Reports on Logistics of the Saarland Business School 16, Saarland University of Applied Sciences (htw saar), Saarland Business School.
    11. Rodolfo Mendoza-Gómez & Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado & Karla B. Valenzuela-Ocaña, 2019. "An Efficient Decision-Making Approach for the Planning of Diagnostic Services in a Segmented Healthcare System," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1631-1665, September.
    12. Michael Johnson & David Turcotte & Felicia Sullivan, 2010. "What Foreclosed Homes Should a Municipality Purchase to Stabilize Vulnerable Neighborhoods?," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 363-388, September.
    13. Stephanie A. Snyder & Robert G. Haight, 2016. "Application of the Maximal Covering Location Problem to Habitat Reserve Site Selection," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 39(1), pages 28-47, January.
    14. Yang, Zhongzhen & Yu, Shunan & Notteboom, Theo, 2016. "Airport location in multiple airport regions (MARs): The role of land and airside accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 98-110.
    15. Varsei, Mohsen & Polyakovskiy, Sergey, 2017. "Sustainable supply chain network design: A case of the wine industry in Australia," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 236-247.
    16. Gustavo Rodrigues de Morais & Yuri Clements Daglia Calil & Gabriel Faria de Oliveira & Rodney Rezende Saldanha & Carlos Andrey Maia, 2023. "A Sustainable Location Model of Transshipment Terminals Applied to the Expansion Strategies of the Soybean Intermodal Transport Network in the State of Mato Grosso, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, January.
    17. Chloe Kim Glaeser & Marshall Fisher & Xuanming Su, 2019. "Optimal Retail Location: Empirical Methodology and Application to Practice," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 86-102, January.
    18. Schuster Puga, Matías & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien, 2017. "A heuristic algorithm for solving large location–inventory problems with demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 413-423.
    19. Yun, Seong Do & Gramig, Benjamin M., 2014. "Dynamic Optimization of Ecosystem Services: A Comparative Analysis of Non-Spatial and Spatially-Explicit Models," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170450, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Roba W. Salem & Mohamed Haouari, 2017. "A simulation-optimisation approach for supply chain network design under supply and demand uncertainties," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 1845-1861, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.